Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for (🍎) 𖦹 raynasabi’s arts 〃

Channel

(🍎) 𖦹 raynasabi’s arts 〃

@RaynaSab1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002115602539
TypeChannel
Username@RaynaSab1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RaynaSab1

Growth

9110296.57 August 2026 — 91 subscribers7 August 2026 — 96 subscribers9 August 2026 — 96 subscribers14 August 2026 — 102 subscribers28 August 2026 — 101 subscribers12 September 2026 — 100 subscribers1007 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 12:36100-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:05101-1
14 Aug 2026, 23:53102+6
9 Aug 2026, 12:1696no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:5696+5
7 Aug 2026, 18:3591first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7231.9%
🤡3716.4%
❤‍🔥3013.3%
custom 52448783795633666402611.5%
custom 524269624411922270993.98%
💔73.10%
🔥73.10%
custom 524223626600672255262.65%
💘62.65%
💋52.21%
🤮41.77%
🤬31.33%
20.885%
👏20.885%
🕊20.885%
😡20.885%
🙏20.885%
🥰20.885%
🍓10.442%
🥱10.442%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC18 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Аааа голые тела смотреть осторожно 🥺 Впервые что-то такое попробовала, но вроде даже ок Делала специально для @DevMagician_999 его Диричей, ухухух В коментах будет фулл

❤‍🔥2custom 524223626600672255221🔥1🥰1custom 52448783795633666401

8 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC25 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

100 ПОДПИСЧИКОВ!!❤️ Спасибо абсолютно каждому человеку, который до сих пор поддерживает мое творчество ❤️ Без вас я бы быстро сдалась!!!

10custom 52426962441192227093custom 524487837956336664031💔1🤡1🙏1

7 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC39 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В перерывах пробуем что-то новое Как вам такой способ рисования на приставке??

11custom 52426962441192227092💔1🤡1

14 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC474 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Успеваю на #PortfolioDay За все это время оч классные работы уже имеются

❤‍🔥6🤡62💔2🥱1

13 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC84 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Знаете, это прекрасно разбавляет контент на этом канале

❤‍🔥6🤡32💔1

26 Jun 2026, 21:29 UTC131 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

коллаб с @Sun_Franciso ❤️наши оски, я очень умилилась рисовать свою любимую вновь!!☁️ #art@RaynaSab1 #collab

custom 524487837956336664096💋5🤮4🤬3🤡2😡2

20 Jun 2026, 19:33 UTC182 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🥬千本櫻 小夜ニ入リテ 君ノ声モ届カザリキ 🥹😱 🥹😱 🥹😱 #art@RaynaSab1🥬

❤‍🔥10custom 524487837956336664076🤡4💔1🙏1custom 52422362660067225521custom 52426962441192227091

18 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTC140 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

кто-то хочет дтиус с нормальными призами?

  1. нет, плохая идея 🤩0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

15 Jun 2026, 14:55 UTC134 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

реквестик для @zw3tyq я не шарю какие у них характеры, основывалась на рефах из пинта…

5🔥4🤡4custom 52426962441192227093custom 52448783795633666401

10 Jun 2026, 09:50 UTC150 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Судьба наверняка сведёт нас вновь где-нибудь под звёздами - я уверена ♪🤩 🤩🤩🤩 По рукам, полюбуемся звёздами вместе.👩 🤩#art@RaynaSab1🤩

9custom 52448783795633666405🤡4custom 52422362660067225523👏2💔1

1 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC161 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

вооот такой дизайн для @lj4tptiivouftdst было приятно рисовать

8🤡3🔥1🥰1

20 May 2026, 18:19 UTC187 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

еще рисую

💘4🤡32❤‍🔥2🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @RaynaSab1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTCFinal Results13 voters

кто-то хочет дтиус с нормальными призами?

  1. нет, плохая идея 🤩0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(🍎) 𖦹 raynasabi’s arts 〃” (@RaynaSab1), 100 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RaynaSab1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.