Channel
@Raye4korrr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004480016065 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Raye4korrr |
| Description | Сот сети Мой тик ток — https://www.tiktok.com/@pae4k0?_r=1&_d=f34hjf45k75435&sec_uid=MS Мой ютуб — https://www.youtube.com/@Pae4ko Мой анон — @FeedbackRayaBot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 3 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Raye4korrr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 22 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 22 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 494 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
41 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5420636618933435666 | 8 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5314731341118466586 | 7 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5298766574017086735 | 5 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5276140420013783420 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5343956824041234559 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5186107872445989731 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| custom 5255910230696403061 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| custom 5273715356924417590 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| custom 5269562961067791620 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5420122863535423864 | 2 | 4.88% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩👾👾👾👾👾👾 🤩 🤩🤩🌟𝙽𝚎𝚠 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚛𝚊𝚢𝚊🌟 [🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮] 🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🤩 Тв/кв::пару матов 🤩🤩 🤩 🤩🤩 ну.. Хз.. Я за пару минут 🤩 нарисовала эту пикчу 🎭 🌟🌟🌟 𝙷𝚊𝚜𝚑𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚜 🌟🌟🌟 🌟 #пикча #репост 💖
custom 52559102306964030611custom 54206366189334356661
🤩🤩👾👾👾👾👾🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 𝙽𝚎𝚠 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚛𝚊𝚢𝚊 🌟 😀😀😀😀 [🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩] 😀. 😀🧨 вспомнила что у меня 😀 есть мини принтер, и обклеила 😀 стол своими сыночками и 🌟 😀дочуркой 🤩🤩 💜 🌟🌟🌟 𝙷𝚊𝚜𝚑𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚜 🌟🌟🌟 🌟 #личная_жизнь #щп 🟣
custom 51861078724459897312
🤩🤩🤩 👾👾🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 𝙽𝚎𝚠 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚛𝚊𝚢𝚊 🌟 💜 [😀😀😀😀😀😀😀] 💜 🤩🤩🤩 адопт снят с 💜 продажи, я нашла ему применение, его все равно никто не покупал ☀ 🌟🌟🌟 𝙷𝚊𝚜𝚑𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚜 🌟🌟🌟 🤩 #Щп #важно 🤩
custom 51861078724459897311
🤩🤩🤩🤩👾👾👾👾👾 🤩 🤩 𝙽𝚎𝚠 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚛𝚊𝚢𝚊 🌟 🤩 [😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀] 🤩 💜 я чу-чуть наверное с трендом опоздала, 🌟🌟🌟 ну и ладно, никогда не поздно 🎭 🌟🌟🌟𝙷𝚊𝚜𝚑𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚜🌟🌟🌟 🎁 #рисунки #арт 👾
custom 52559102306964030611custom 52737153569244175901custom 52761404200137834201custom 52987665740170867351
🤩🤩🤩 👾👾👾👾👾👾 🌟 🤩 🤩 😳😱 коллаб пикча с 🤩 клутым бро 😀😀 🤩 #коллаб #пикча
custom 53147313411184665863custom 52737153569244175901custom 52987665740170867351custom 54206366189334356661
😀😀👾👾👾👾👾😀🤩🤩 😀😀 😀😀 сделала адоптика, надеюсь, 😀😀 что купите!! 🌟🌟 😀😀 начальная цена:: 15-25 ⭐ 🤩 Когда вы купите адопта, имейте ввиду что:: 1️⃣ Я не могу перепродавать или использовать как либо персонажа 2️⃣ когда вы покупаете адопта, этот персонаж становиться полностью вашим 3️⃣ в комплекте (по желанию) будет входить ос из гача лайфа
custom 52695629610677916202custom 52559102306964030611custom 54201228635354238641custom 54206366189334356661
Хорошо Предлагайте в комментарии стили в которых хотите адоптика Потом создам опрос, и то, что соберет больше всего голосов я сделаю!!
custom 53439568240412345592custom 52761404200137834201
#опрос Хештег не поставился..
custom 52761404200137834201
🤩 Как дела? Хотите адоптов? 🎭 🤩#опрос 😀😀😀
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 😀😀🌟:: Нашла у себя клад с кучей рандома и кринжа #щп
custom 52987665740170867351custom 53147313411184665861custom 54206366189334356661
🤩🤩👾👾👾👾👾👾👾🤩🤩 🤩🤩 бригаду почему она 🤩🤩 Рисует на пожелтевшей бумаге.. 🤩🤩 ⚡️⚡️ #рисунки 🤩🤩
custom 52737153569244175901custom 54201228635354238641
🤩 👾👾👾👾👾👾 💜 . 💜 Коллабик с клутым бро из 💜 Флуда [@Paradoxer_Kwas] #коллаб #обработка
custom 52987665740170867351custom 53147313411184665861custom 53439568240412345591custom 54206366189334356661
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Raye4korrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤩 Как дела? Хотите адоптов? 🎭 🤩#опрос 😀😀😀
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 508,817 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rayechko.com!” (@Raye4korrr), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Raye4korrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.