🎄 HAPPY NEW YEAR, GUYS, LET’S GO!!! 🎄 HAPPY 2026! Wishing everyone more profits in trading, calm markets, clean entries, and great vibes. May this year bring growth, stability, and new wins 🚀🔥
❤11

Channel
@Ray_Trading
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
593subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002491904413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ray_Trading |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ray_Trading |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 593 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 596 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 596 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 70.4% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 16.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 7.41% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 1 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ray_Trading. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 October 2025 to 1 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎄 HAPPY NEW YEAR, GUYS, LET’S GO!!! 🎄 HAPPY 2026! Wishing everyone more profits in trading, calm markets, clean entries, and great vibes. May this year bring growth, stability, and new wins 🚀🔥
❤11
💥 Champions, don’t forget! 💥 I offer free training where I explain how the market really works and how to trade the right way. If you want to understand trading, read the market properly, and stop guessing — make sure to check it out. 🎁 Training link below t.me/Ray_Training
❤2
▶️Champions ▶️ 💵 Asher — instant market strike: $2,000 WON 💵 Marty — disciplined 3-phase execution: $4,983 💵 Ludivina — clean 2-phase control: $1,769 💵 Pierce — dominant 4-phase power move: $12,502 💵 Daniele — precise 2-phase setup: $1,769 💵 Goldy_Trading — structured 3-phase climb: $3,987 💵 Oliva — smooth 2-phase continuation: $1,590 💵 Madison Leigh — confident 3-phase advance: $4,319 💵 Adalberto — solid 4-phase c…
❤2🔥1
▶️Champions ▶️ 💵 Mia Harper — confident 4-phase execution: $3,282 💵 Adalberto — clean instant win: $2,000 WON 💵Emily Kate — strong 2-phase control: $6,125 💵Oliva — mirrored 2-phase precision: $6,125 💵Frank Senatro — disciplined 4-phase push: $3,282 💵 Damon Strickland — aggressive 4-phase strike: $3,286 💵 Michael — smooth 3-phase setup: $1,875 💵Emily Kate — powerful 3-phase breakout: $8,043 💵Dong — explosive 3-phase …
🔥1
▶️Champions ▶️ 💵 Ludivina — structured 4-phase push: $4,383 💵 Emily Kate — precise 2-step progression: $2,122 💵 Mia Harper — clean 1-phase capture: $940 💵Van — explosive breakout win: $4,000 WON 💵 Goldy_Trading — calculated 3-phase advance: $4,651 💵Asher — dominant 4-phase strike: $5,624 💵McBride — sharp 1-tick entry: $659 💵Avery Kingsley — controlled 2-phase movement: $2,122 💵 Vaughn — disciplined 3-step rise: $4,6…
💯1
🎄 Champions, the New Year is almost here!🎄 The festive mood is already in the air, and I want to tell you something important: ✨ I am incredibly happy that you are always with me. Your trust and support make our team stronger every single day. And I will continue to bring you even more profits, positivity, and beautiful victories. Thank you for being with me. I love you, champions. ❤️❄️
❤9
▶️Champions ▶️ 💵 Mia Harper — clean 1-step take: $875 💵Zane Holloway — structured 3-phase rise: $4,823 💵Emily Kate — dominant 4-phase strike: $9,378 💵Daniele — precise 3-phase move: $3,751 💵 Marty — sharp 1-phase capture: $875 💵 Dong — explosive momentum win: $2,500 WON 💵 Asher — powerful breakout finish: $4,000 WON 🎉 Final figures: ✔️ Entered the balance: $5,000 ⭐️ Withdrawals: $26,202 📈 Trading Platform: https…
❤2
▶️Champions ▶️ 💵 Michael — clean 1-step take: $875 💵Nathan Drew — structured 3-phase climb: $4,823 💵 Anonymous — controlled 2-phase entry: $1,530 💵 Daniele — dominant 4-phase strike: $9,378 💵 Elizabete — precise 2-step setup: $1,226 💵 Divina — quick 1-phase capture: $875 💵 Ludivina — sharp 2-phase push: $1,531 💵 Goldy_Trading — calculated 3-phase run: $4,020 💵 Damon Strickland — powerful 1-phase sweep: $3,500 💵 Oliv…
❤3
▶️Champions ▶️ 💵 Michael — precise 2-phase push: $1,531 💵 Mia Harper — clean 1-step take: $874 💵 Damon Strickland — dominant 4-phase strike: $8,041 💵 Bibiana — sharp 1-phase capture: $875 💵 Carmelina — controlled 2-phase execution: $1,531 💵 Graciano — powerful 3-phase breakout: $5,361 💵 Landon — structured 4-phase climb: $5,158 💵 Herminia — smooth 1-phase entry: $877 💵 Emily Kate — confident 2-phase advancement: $2,…
🔥4
Guys, I just want to say that I love you all ❤️ And I’m truly happy that you are here with me. We keep moving forward, we aim for victories, and I believe — we will conquer this market together. Thank you to everyone who supports, believes, and stays with me. Our journey is only beginning 💪
❤13🙏3🍓1
▶️Champions ▶️ 💵 Goldy_Trading — dominant 5-phase strike: $8,206 💵 Emily Kate — precise 4-step delivery: $4,695 💵 Oliva — flawless entry — $6,000 WON 💵 Van — structured 4-phase control: $4,688 💵 Dong — powerful 5-phase breakout: $8,214 💵 Damon Strickland — massive win — $8,000 WON 💵 Victoria — confident performance — $5,000 WON 💵 Pierce — consistent 5-phase execution: $8,206 💵 Isaiah — sharp 4-step setup: $4,694 💵 G…
🔥2
▶️Champions ▶️ 💵 Ludivina — dominant 5-phase strike: $11,742 💵 Emily Kate — flawless performance — $6,500 WON 💵 Frank Senatro — precise 4-step delivery: $6,246 💵 Damon Strickland — confident win — $4,000 WON 💵 Daniele — structured 5-phase run: $11,742 💵 Dong — sharp result — $3,000 WON 💵 Frank Senatro — solid rebound — $2,000 WON 💵 Oaklynn — consistent 5-phase execution: $11,742 💵 Hayes — calculated 4-step setup: $6…
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ray_Trading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RayTrading” (@Ray_Trading), 593 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ray_Trading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.