Channel
@RavenBloom369
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
201subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004402533305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RavenBloom369 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RavenBloom369 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 201 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 205 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 205 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 173 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 61.1% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 38.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Praise the Knights of Guinevere — Mela Mirage Asleep in a castle so gentle and pure A most perfect night may it seem Surrounded by anguish and torment and hurt Wake from your twisted dream Living in the heart in a city in the dark Ravaged from the remnants and pollutants from the park Working through the night, then you catch an eerie sight Pulled in from the water, you're surprised by what you find A shift from th…
Praise the Knights of Guinevere — Mela Mirage
🔥2
Psychology
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
°•~●° توانایی آفرینش: 💜•°•| قدرت تو از قلمت سرچشمه میگیره. یک قلم خاص که توانایی خلق هرچیزی رو که تصورش کنی داره... قلمت رو روی کاغذ بزار، اون رو حرکتش بده و اجازه بده خیالپردازیت مسیر رو نشونت بده... هرچیزی که با این قلم روی کاغذ آورده بشه به واقعیت تبدیل میشه. تمام نقاشیها، تمام نوشتهها یا هرچیزی که تصورش رو کنی واقعی میشن. این قدرت توعه. تو یک خالقی. یه آفریننده. 🕷🕸| محدودیت: مراقب قلمت باش. این قلم فقط به د…
🔥2
اون دوتا بنده خدایی که پرایوت شیر کردین لینک چنلتون رو برام بفرستین یه بنده خدای دیگه هم گذاشته بود ولی پاک کرد توهم بی زحمت لینک چنلت رو برام بفرست: http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=6495600944
°•~●° دستکاری مرگ: 🩶•°•|قدرت تو دستگاری زندگی و مرگه. تو میتونی روح مردگان رو به زندگی برگردونی. ولی اینکار نیاز به زمان و ظرافت زیادی داره. برای زنده کردن یک نفر اول باید فرد دیگهای بمیره. پیدا کردن یک بدن سالم یا یک قربانی که بتونی روحش رو با روح فرد مرده جابهجا کنی کار سختیه. ولی غیرممکن نیست. با قدرتی که داری نه تنها میتونی روح انسانهارو بلکه حتی شیاطین و ارواح شرور دنیای زیرین رو هم به زندگی برگردونی. هرکسی…
🔥1
°•~●°شانس بینهایت: •°•♥️| بله درسته. شانس قدرت فوق بشری توعه. فرقی نمیکنه که چند بار تاس بندازی یا چند دست بازی کنی، تو همیشه برنده میشی! ولی توانایی تو مختص به شانس خوب نیست. تو میتونی شانس آدمها رو دست کاری کنی. میتونی کاری کنی که کسی تمام زندگیش رو توی باتلاق بدشانسی گیر کنه و دست به هرچی بزنه خاکستر بشه، یا برعکس... میتونی کاری کنی که فرد توی هرچیزی برنده بشه. زندگی برای تو شبیه یه بازیه و تو صاحب خود کازینو …
❤1
°•~●°توانایی سفر در خوابها: 🩵•°•| قدرت ماورایی تو سفر در رویاهاست. زمانی که مردم به خواب فرو میرن و در بیدفاعترین وضعیت خودشون هستن تو به رویاهای اونها سفر میکنی. تو میتونی تاریک ترین ابعاد هر انسان رو ببینی، میتونی روحش رو مثل یه کتاب ورق بزنی و از عمیقترین ترسهاش با خبر بشی. تو قابلیت اینو داری که خواب های اونها رو تغییر بدی. دنیای رویا سرزمین حکمرانی توعه و تو حاکم اونجایی. 🕷•°•|محدودیت: احتیاط کن. تو میتون…
🔥1
°•~●°توانایی کنترل سایهها: 🖤•°•| قدرت ماورایی تو کنترل سایههاست. سایهها خدمتگذاران وفادار تو هستن. با قدرتی که داری افراد رو تحت کنترل خودت درمیاری. هیچچیز و هیچکس نمیتونه برخلاف حرکات سایهاش رفتار کنه و تو کسی هستی که دستور حرکات رو میده. با چنین قدرتی آدم ها برات شبیه عروسک های خیمه شبازی میشن و تو یه عروسک گردان ماهری. با قدرتی که داری میتونی جسم افراد رو به حرکت در بیاری. اونها دقیقا همون کاری رو میکنن که …
🔥1
http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=6495600944 بچه هایی که پرایوت هستین اینجا لینک چنلتون رو برام بفرستین اگه قبلا گذاشتین ولی بعد پاک کردین هم اینجا بفرستین چنلتون رو برام
Little Dark Age — MGMT Breathing in the dark, lying on its side The ruins of the day painted with a scar And the more I straighten out, the less it wants to try The feelings start to rot, one wink at a time Oh-oh, forgiving who you are, for what you stand to gain Just know that if you hide, it doesn't go away When you get out of bed, don't end up stranded Horrified with each stone on the stage, my little dark age…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @RavenBloom369. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 968,635 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RavenBloom369 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RavenBloom” (@RavenBloom369), 201 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavenBloom369.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.