Channel
@RavaghigariDarDonyayeEmrooz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
752subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001403060223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RavaghigariDarDonyayeEmrooz |
| Created | Between 1 October 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RavaghigariDarDonyayeEmrooz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 752 | +10 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 742 | +3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 739 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 June 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 562 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
125 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119 | 95.2% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هرچه در بالاست، در پایین هم هست از پنجرهی هواپیما، همهچیز کوچک به نظر میرسد. از پنجرهی فضاپیما، مرزها و تفاوتها کمکم از میان میروند. از فراز آکروپولیس، همانجایی که روزگاری مارکوس اورلیوس ایستاده بود، میتوان ریتم زندگی و پیوند میان همهچیز را دید: «گلهها، سپاهها، مزرعهها؛ عروسیها، طلاقها، تولدها و مرگها؛ دادگاههای شلوغ و جاهای متروک؛ مردمانی از سرزمینهای گوناگون؛ روزهای جشن، روزهای سوگواری، روزهای با…
❤7
As Above, So Below From the window of an airplane, everything looks small. From the window of a spaceship borders and distinctions fall away. From the top of the Acropolis, where Marcus Aurelius once stood, you see the rhythm and the interconnectedness of life: “herds, armies, farms; weddings, divorces, births, deaths; noisy courtrooms, desert places; all the foreign peoples; holidays, days of mourning, market days …
❤1
برای «فهمیدن» آن، به یک راهنما نیاز است مارکوس اورلیوس در زندگی از امتیازهای بسیاری برخوردار بود. در خانوادهای خوب به دنیا آمد. مرد بود، آن هم در جامعهای که مردان در آن دست بالا را داشتند. و بعد، در اتفاقی که بهراستی باورنکردنی بود، برگزیده شد تا قدرتمندترین فرد جهان باشد. اما شاید خوشاقبالترین اتفاق زندگی مارکوس اورلیوس، آشنایی او با روستیکوس، استاد فلسفهاش، بود. مارکوس در تأملات نوشت: «همانطور که خواندن و …
❤6👍2
It Takes a Guide To ‘Get’ It Marcus Aurelius had many advantages in life. He was born to a good family. He was born a man in a male-dominated society. He was then, in an unbelievable stroke of good luck, chosen to be the most powerful person in the world. But the luckiest break that Marcus Aurelius got came in the form of Rusticus, his philosophy teacher. “Just as reading and writing require a master,” Marcus wrot…
❤2
چگونه از یک پادشاه آزادتر باشیم یکی برده بود؛ دیگری قدرتمندترین مرد جهان. یکی تقریباً هیچ نداشت؛ دیگری از کاخی در روم بر یک امپراتوری فرمان میراند. با این همه، اپیکتتوس، فیلسوف رواقی، آزاد بود و نرون، امپراتور روم، در بند. نرون میتوانست به سپاهیان فرمان دهد، حکم مرگ صادر کند و ارادهاش را بر پهنهی یک امپراتوری تحمیل کند؛ اما از فرمانروایی بر خویشتن عاجز بود. شهوتها، خشم، خودبینی و ترسهایش بر او حکومت میکردند. ا…
❤9👍4
How to Be Freer Than a King One was a slave. The other was the most powerful man in the world. One lived with almost nothing. The other ruled from a palace in Rome. Yet the Stoic philosopher Epictetus was free, while the emperor Nero was trapped. Nero could command armies, order executions, and bend an empire to his will. But he could not govern himself. He was ruled by his appetites, his anger, his vanity, and his …
❤3
این جمله ارزش به خاطر سپردن دارد آیا تا به حال در کتابی جملهای خواندهاید که کمک کند زندگی را به شیوهای تازه درک کنید؟ یا مصرعی از یک ترانه شنیدهاید که حقیقتی درباره جهان را دقیقاً بیان کند؟ یا نصیحتی دریافت کردهاید که در موقعیتهای بیشماری به قاعدهای برای عمل تبدیل شود؟ شما تنها نیستید. در کتاب تأملات بارها میبینیم که مارکوس اورلیوس نیز چنین میکند؛ او جملاتی از اپیکتتوس، شعرها و نمایشنامهها نقل میکند. ج…
❤14
This is a Line Worth Remembering Have you ever read a line in a book that helps you understand life in a new way? A song lyric you hear that nails something about the world? A piece of advice that gives you a rule to follow in countless situations? You’re not the only one. We see Marcus Aurelius do this in Meditations repeatedly—quoting lines from Epictetus, from poems, from plays. George Washington did this, too.…
❤3
برای کسانی که بیش از همه برایت اهمیت دارند، حضوری پررنگتر داشته باش؛ با آموختنِ اینکه کمتر بر چیزهایی تمرکز کنی که اهمیتی ندارند. رایان هالیدی
❤4
اکنون همهی ما پادشاهیم در بخش اعظم تاریخ بشر، همواره کسی دیگر زمام امور را در دست داشت: پادشاهی، اربابی، خودکامهای یا رئیس قبیلهای. در روم باستان، این شخص امپراتور بود. مارکوس اورلیوس قدرتمندترین مرد جهان به شمار میرفت. میتوانست هر کاری که میخواست انجام دهد و هیچکس نمیتوانست به او بگوید چه کند یا از چه کاری دست بکشد. البته این قدرت مطلق، تنها به معنای لذت و آسودگی نبود؛ زیرا همانقدر که او را در معرض وسوسه…
❤10
We Are All Kings Now For most of human history, somebody else—a king, a lord, a tyrant, a chief—was in charge. In ancient Rome, that was the emperor. Marcus Aurelius was the most powerful man in the world. He could do anything he wanted. No one could tell him what to do or not do. This was not all fun and games of course, since this not only presented him with incredible amounts of temptation, but also an enormous a…
❤1
آنچه تمرین میکنی، همان میشوی عادتهایت تو را تعریف میکنند. قرار است به چه کسی بدل شوی؟ تو هر روز در حال تمرین چیزی هستی. هر بار که به قول خود عمل میکنی، انضباط را تمرین میکنی. هر بار که کاری را به تعویق میاندازی، تأخیر و امروزوفردا کردن را تمرین میکنی. هر بار که صبر، خویشتنداری، کوشش یا توجه را برمیگزینی، به آتشی سوخت میرسانی. و هر بار که تسلیم حواسپرتی، تندخویی، گریز از مسئولیت یا تکانههای آنی میشوی،…
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RavaghigariDarDonyayeEmrooz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فلسفه رواقی | Stoic Philosophy” (@RavaghigariDarDonyayeEmrooz), 752 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavaghigariDarDonyayeEmrooz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.