Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rassenhygiene

Channel

Rassenhygiene

@Rassenhygiene

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

87subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003859552221
TypeChannel
Username@Rassenhygiene
Created24 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rassenhygiene

Growth

8187848 August 2026 — 81 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82 subscribers17 August 2026 — 87 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80–88 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:5587+5
9 Aug 2026, 18:1782no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:5282+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:0481first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC174 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @polacksandthereichPhoto

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐒 𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 "Furthermore, in a one-hour lecture to the entire squadron, the training officer, standing in for the ailing squadron commander, discussed the artwork "Victory of the Weapons - Victory of the Child," which had been distributed to every squadron member. Using this excellent visual material, the SS members were shown that increased genetically healthy offspring we

11 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC952 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

I am very grateful for the telegram sent to me from the First Scientific Conference on the Investigation of Tobacco Dangers and the opening of the scientific institute serving this purpose in Jena. I return your greetings with my best wishes for your work to liberate society from one of its most dangerous poisons. Für das mir von der Ersten Wissenschaftlichen Tagung zur Erforschung der Tabakgofuhren und der Eröffnun

9 Jun 2026, 13:45 UTC811 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

"Black German solider In Czechoslovakia" If you've been on the internet for a bit, you might have seen the picture on the left. Usually used by Third Worldists or Black larps to show a negro fighting for the Wehrmacht, but the truth Is that it's just a bad and low resolution photo of a German Wehrmacht soldier. Source Rassenhygiene

29 Mar 2026, 10:49 UTC499 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Suppose that one half of the population has two children per marriage and the other half has five; then, after just five generations, there would be such a shift in favor of the more fertile population group that it would have risen to 99%. In an area populated by whites and blacks, the ratio between the two is 1:1. How this ratio shifts in favor of blacks can be illustrated by an example from the Union of South Afr

29 Mar 2026, 08:52 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Sterilization: Not punishment - but liberation. Which parents would wish such a terrible fate on their children? Who would want to be guilty of this? Sterilisation: Nicht Strafe - sondern Befreiung. Welche Eltern möchten ihren Kindern ein so entsetzliches Los wünschen? Wer wollte hieran schuldig sein? Rassenhygiene

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Rassenhygiene. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,059,858 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rassenhygiene” (@Rassenhygiene), 87 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rassenhygiene.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.