Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Упавшее НЛО | Rarerior

@Rarerior

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001851622471
TypeChannel
Username@Rarerior
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rarerior

Growth

1101121116 August 2026 — 110 subscribers9 August 2026 — 110 subscribers13 August 2026 — 112 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:15112+2
9 Aug 2026, 07:02110no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:04110first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.9%
avg views ÷ 112 subscribers
Avg views / post
122
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held12 (30 May 202626 July 2026)
Views total366
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC96 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Продолжая тенденцию, картинка #Арт

19 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC126 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Новый подиум макса новая картинка Рука левая не вышла, мб на какой-нибудь из практик дорисую Или на квалификации Ну вы поняли Под формулу рисовать очень балдежно Спудимен ау кстати Выживаю пока на быстрых скетчевых картинках #Арт

18 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC144 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Так вышло, что нарисовалась картинка #Арт

2 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC183 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В перерыве от страничек на артфайт #Арт

21 Jun 2026, 04:13 UTC214 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Артфайт!!! https://artfight.net/~Rarerior #Арт

15 Jun 2026, 00:52 UTC227 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В стиле обложек граф романов #Арт

3 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC186 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Лан, мне надоело это мучать #Арт

3 Jun 2026, 10:28 UTC156 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Внезапно берет и закидывает еще штук из одной из магм ahhh core #Арт

30 May 2026, 21:41 UTC230 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Думаю, мне надо немного разъяснить ↓ Мое психическое состояние сейчас не в лучшей своей кондиции. И даже при том, мой главный враг - я сама, подразумевание постоянного общения с аудиторией тут и мой близкий коннект с вами эту кондицию лишь усугублял Поэтому сейчас я хочу обозначить границы Этот тгк становится полноценной арт-галереей. Коммы останутся, хорошие дискуссии под рисуночками и внезапные вбросы мне по душе

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Rarerior. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 441,091 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Упавшее НЛО | Rarerior” (@Rarerior), 112 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rarerior.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.