27 Dec 2025, 17:47 UTCviews —
Live stream started
Channel
⚘ رَحِــــيـقُ السُنّـــہ'ة ⚘
@Rahik_Sona
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001196344917 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rahik_Sona |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 23 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rahik_Sona |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 33 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 33 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 23 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 04s
- Average length
- 1m 04s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
27 Dec 2025, 16:28 UTCviews —
Live stream finished (1 hour)
27 Dec 2025, 15:16 UTCviews —
Live stream started
28 Jun 2021, 10:14 UTC392 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
. علوم القرآن هي العُلوم المتعلّقة بالقرآن من حيث نزوله وترتيبه، وجمعه وكتابته، وقراءاته وتجويده، وعلوم التفسير ومعرفة المحكم والمتشابه، والناسخ والمنسوخ، وأسباب النّزول، وإعجازه، وإعرابه ورسمه، وعلم غريب القرآن، وغير ذلك من العلوم المتعلقة بالقرآن. ويُعرف أيضًا بأنّها جميع العلوم والبحوث الَّتِي تتعلق بالقرآن، أو كلّ ما يتصل بالقرآن. يُطلق عليها أيضًا علوم التّنزيل، أو علوم الكتاب، وقد عدّ الزّركشِيّ علوم القرآن ف…
24 Jun 2021, 19:06 UTC828 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
📌قَالَ عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنِ أَحْمَدَ إِبْنِ حَنْبَل ـ رَحِمَهُمَا اللهُ ـ : «سَأَلْتُ أَبِيٰ: أَيُّ الْقِرَاءَةِ أَحَبُّ إِلَيْكَ؟، قَالَ: قِرَاءَةُ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ [أَيْ: نَافِعٌ]، فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فَقِرَاءَةُ عَاصِم». 📖•|{مَعْرِفـةُ الْقُرَّاءِ الْكِبَارِ ١/١٠٨}|. 🌱☁
24 Jun 2021, 19:05 UTC286 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
•• [ المَعَاصِي تُذهِبُ الحَياءَ ] • مِن عُقُوبَتها أنَّها تُذهبُ الحَياءَ الّذي هُو مَادةُ حَياةِ القَلبِ، وهوَ أصلُ كلّ خَيرٍ، وذَهابهُ ذَهابُ الخَيرِ أجمَع. • وفِي الصّحَيحِ عَنهُ أنهُ قالَﷺ: «الحيَاءُ خيرٌ كُلّه» • وقَال:«إنَّ مِمَا أدرَكَ النَّاس مِن كَلامِ النّبوةِ الأولَىٰ: إذَا لَم تَستَحِ فَاصنَع مَا شِئتَ» ‐المَقصودُ: أنَّ الذّنوبَ تُضعفُ الحَياءَ مِن العبدِ، حتّىٰ ربَما انسَلخَ مِنهُ بالكُليّة، حتّىٰ …
24 Jun 2021, 01:29 UTC246 viewsread 11 August 2026
📍 نشر العلم سبب في انتشار الخير .. 🔸 قال الشيخ/ سليمان الرحيلي وفقه الله: الناس قد تمرّ بهم فترات فتور؛ يضعف الدين فيها، وهذا تجده في بعض البلدان، فتجد أنه في زمن من الأزمنة يَفتر أهل البلد ويَضعف الدين عندهم ضعفا شديدا، ثم في فترة يَنشط، وسبب هذا هو العلم والجهل، فإذا نشط أهل العلم ونشروا العلم بالكتاب والسنة؛ نشط الناس في الخير، وإذا فَتَر أهل العلم في نشر العلم بالكتاب والسنة، وتركوا الأمر لغيرهم لنشر ما هو في ح…
24 Jun 2021, 01:29 UTC230 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
قال ابن الجوزي -رحمه الله-: "انظر إلى حالك الذي أنت عليه؛ إن كان يصلح للموت والقبر، فاستمرَّ عليه، وإن كان لا يصلح لهذين، فتب إلى الله منها، وارجع إلى ما يصلح". • المصدر: [بستان الواعظين (192/1)].
24 Jun 2021, 01:21 UTC217 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
▪️ قــــال فضيـلة الـشـيخ العــــلامــة محمّـد سعيـد رسـلان -حفظـه اللـہ تعـالـى - « النبي ﷺ ڪما في حجّة الوداع -وهي الحجّة الوحيدة التي حجّها رسول اللـہ ﷺ- أتـى بمظاهر التوحيد ظاهـرة مِـن أول لحظة ڪما في الحـديث الصحيح بشـواهـده: ((اللهم حَجَّةً لَا رِيَاءَ فِيهَا وَلَا سُمْعَةَ))؛ لأنـه لا بدّ مِـن إفـراد اللـه ربّ العالمين بالعبـادة وحـده، ولا بدّ مِـن الإخـلاص للـه ربّ العـالميـن في ذلڪ؛ وإلاّ فـإنٍّ العم…
24 Jun 2021, 01:18 UTC195 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlWasiyyahVideo
▪️(تجارتك الرابحة هم أولادك) 🎙الشيخ صالح الفوزان حفظه الله.
24 Jun 2021, 00:57 UTC187 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
✍ قال العلامة ابن عثيمين رحمه الله تعالى : عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه أنّ رجلا قال للنبي صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم: أوصني. قال : « لا تغضَبْ » فعوّد نفسك التحمّل وعدم الغضب، فقد كان الأعرابي يجذب رداء النبي صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم، حتى يؤثر في رقبته صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم، ثم يلتفت إليه ويضحك، مع أنّ هذا لو فعله أحد آخر، فأقل شيء أن يغضب عليه، فعليك بالحلم ما أمكنك ذلك. 📚 شرح الأربعين النووية ( ٢…
23 Jun 2021, 18:56 UTC161 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @koni_sahabia
قائمة كوني صحابية🎉تعلن لكن انها فتحت قائمة جديدة بحمد الله من تريد اضافة قناتها من هنا نستقبل احلى قنوات🌸 @Rayyhhana
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Rahik_Sona. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,343,261 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Rahik_Sona named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rayyhhana
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚘ رَحِــــيـقُ السُنّـــہ'ة ⚘” (@Rahik_Sona), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rahik_Sona.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.