Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RahaRM | رها آرام

@RahaRM_Official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

276subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002332514950
TypeChannel
Username@RahaRM_Official
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RahaRM_Official

Growth

275276275.510 Aug 2026, 05:01 — 275 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 02:24 — 276 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:0111 Aug 2026, 02:24
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:24276+1
10 Aug 2026, 05:01275first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.1%
avg views ÷ 276 subscribers
Avg views / post
147
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (16 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,784
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 08s
Average length
2m 34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1932.2%
👍1830.5%
👎1118.6%
😭35.08%
👀23.39%
🔥11.69%
😁11.69%
🤔11.69%
🤣11.69%
🤯11.69%
🥰11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC52 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

سعی کنید از این قابلیت ساخت پروفایل در مرورگر ها استفاده کنین دلیل ؟ 1. بتونی واس هر پروفایل اختصاصی کاستوم کنین 2. اکستنشن های اختصاصی در نظر بگیرین 3. هر پروفایل ایزوله اس و کوکی ها / هیستوری ها جدا از همن چرا ب این فکر افتادم جداشون کنم ؟ یه دلیل قانع کننده بیار ک من از مرورگر داخلی برپ استفاده کنم ... 😐 (وقت کنم راجبش مینویسم) راجب کاستوم کردنش تو پنتست و هانت هم یه پست مفصل مینویسم ... #trick #tools

👍2👎1

4 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC101 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

حذف کدهای رنگی (ANSI) از خروجی ترمینال (اگه حوصله داکیومنت خوندن نداری) : وقتی خروجی یه برنامه ای رنگی رو میریزی توی فایل پر میشه از کاراکترهای اضافی: ←[31mHello←[0m راه حل : یه sed ساده ک کدهای ANSI رو پاک میکنه : command | sed -r 's/\x1B\[[0-9;?]*[a-zA-Z]//g' > output.txt اگه مدام لازمش داری تابعش رو بذار توی ~/.bashrc: nocolor() { sed -r 's/\x1B\[[0-9;?]*[a-zA-Z]//g'; } و بعدش: command | nocolor > output.txt lik

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC127 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

خب انگاری شرایط جنگ و هرج و مرج در پیشه قطعی هم احتمالا تو راهه پس امیدوارم حال همگی تون خوب باشه (بغیر از اون افرادی ک باعث و بانی این شرایط شدن) و بشینین یه چندتا آموزش دانلود کنین و آفلاین کار کنین و ... #موقتی_تااوضاع_بهتر

2

30 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC150 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://github.com/mhyrzt/xrat https://github.com/Keivan-sf/Bushuray-tui دنبال یه کلاینتی واسه v2ray and xray اینا میگشتم که تحت tui باشه منتهی همین دوتا رو پیدا کردم این xrat اسمش غلط اندازه ولی سازنده اش ایرانیه (کاش یه اسم بهتری واسش در نظر میگرفت) دوستانی ک rust کار هستن این ریپو رو یه بررسی کنین. #tools #tui

30 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC116 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://awesometui.com/ terminal UI مث فروشگاه میمونه واسم توش میچرخم و یه سریا رو تست میکنم ... خیلی باهاله #tools #tui

1

28 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC124 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/373q9V2uf-I لایو - حمید کشفی - 3 ساعت هستش و موضوعی ک راجبش صحبت میکنه ai تو امنیت و باگ بانتی و ایناس

👍2

26 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC177 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

اگر دیدین تو دنیای واقعی (ن فیلم های هالیوودی) هر چقد باگ میزنین نتیجه اش دوپ (داپلیکت یا تکراری) میشه ناامید نشید ب بقیه هم نگا کنین ببینین نتیجه اونا چطوری بوده ... و دنبال یه راه کاری باشید ک زودتر ب نتیجه برسید این متنی ک گفتم یه جایی باس تموم بشه دیه ن ؟ ینی چی ؟ ینی اگر دیدین از 70 درصد باگ هایی ک میزنن (کل گزارش های سال یه پلتفرم) دوپ میشه بدونین ai کار خودشو کرده و باس باگ بانتی رو بزارین کنار سنگین گفتم

👍3🤔1

23 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC196 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

امیدوارم این حباب هالیوود بازیاشون بترکه ببینیم چ خاکی تو سرمون میتونیم بریزیم😂🤦🏻‍♀️ لنتی هیچ جوره هم نمیشه صحت سنجی کرد فقط چون گفتن باس باور کرد؟

🤣1😁1

23 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC168 viewsread 10 August 2026

حس میکنم بیشتر شبیه فیلم هالیوودیه تا واقعیت ... #جوک

22 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC169 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://github.com/wilsonglasser/oryxis خیلی سریع و سبکه، فیچراش از termius پولی هم بیشتره قبلا خیلی دنبال جایگزین termius (ذلیل شده) بودم #tool

👍1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @RahaRM_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 853,375 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RahaRM | رها آرام” (@RahaRM_Official), 276 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RahaRM_Official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.