Channel
@Ragz_To_Riches
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
167subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002063766649 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ragz_To_Riches |
| Description | This is financial advice |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ragz_To_Riches |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 167 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 167 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
121 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 47.1% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 28.1% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 15.7% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 4.96% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2024 to 5 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Be aware of any ‘Jeffry relaunches’, they are scams. The OG team are not affiliated with them. Do not get scammed by other projects copying our work and claiming we are on-board. The OG team are re-launching on SOL soon, any updates regarding this will be announced in this channel and on my Twitter.🙂
❤11🔥4😁1
JEFFRY hit 6 million MC. Congrats to anyone sniped off the CA I posted
❤12🍾6👍6
Trending #1 on Dextools. 2mill market cap.
👍11
0x073a3b3e890a3aaeb061e50e92fffdd31197870b
🔥3🤡2
$JEFFRY is launching soon..
🔥5
I’ve Partnered with a well known dev in the space to launch a project together. We’ve been working on this over the last month or two. You’ve all seen how Matt Furie influenced the space. Now let me introduce you to Joan Cornella 🤝 We Bring You $JEFFRY https://t.me/JeffryOnTG
❤7🔥2
When a DEV doxxes you never sell ✍
❤7🔥7
$PAPO ATH, I am not going to stop pushing this..
❤8🔥7🥰1
Thanks to everyone who invested into my project today. It was a successful launch. We still are getting it listed on exchanges and have a lot more marketing coming. This is the reality of a lot of memecoins tho and even when you dox yourself, burn liquidity, renounce and no taxes. People still dump. I’m happy to see a lot of you made a lot of money tho. Happy to share a positive message and happy to keep launching …
❤9🔥2🥰1
I’m launching a coin on ETH later today. https://t.me/PAPO_ETH
🔥4❤1👍1
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/solana/pair-explorer/H8Y1Br3LRkTBfsFp6qNX9CPN98DjvAtUc9xVScmj2fry?t=1718266889512
If you made profit today pay yourself , yes there is a potential to go higher but let the FOMC finish then we see what Asia will do. if you FOMO in and you over trade then you have a mentality of gambler so don’t do it.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ragz_To_Riches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rags To Riches” (@Ragz_To_Riches), 167 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ragz_To_Riches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.