Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Rafe — Designer|| ЗАКРЫТО

@Rafe209

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002371113555
TypeChannel
Username@Rafe209
DescriptionНачало: 09.03.2025 Пнг канал: https://t.me/Png_Riff1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Rafe209

Growth

912 Aug 2026, 13:21 — 9 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:31 — 9 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:2112 Aug 2026, 13:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:319no change
12 Aug 2026, 13:219first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
129
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5247026348542676355541.7%
custom 5244597226709210195433.3%
custom 5265227848712477277325.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2025 to 3 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2025, 23:43 UTC102 viewsread 12 August 2026

Утром удалю https://t.me/Riff189

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

30 May 2025, 21:40 UTC134 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

30 May 2025, 21:40 UTC142 viewsread 12 August 2026

Новость: когда я подтяну свой уровень в дизайне я вернусь.

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

30 May 2025, 21:39 UTC138 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

30 May 2025, 21:37 UTC135 viewsread 12 August 2026

Разрыв союза с @Rafe209 Я РЕВУУ РЕЙФ Кстати Рейф,благодарю тебя, ведь благодаря тебе начался мой дизайнерский путь.

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

29 May 2025, 21:15 UTC117 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

29 May 2025, 21:15 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну чтож ребят, и мое время пришло уходить. Спасибо что были со мной и тем более админом этим тгк, я очень рад что они тут были. Ещё спасибо людям: Роко (вроде так) Сукуне и Кит кату. Извините, я пытался проявить интерес, я много раз говорил что закрытие это не выход но так сложилась судьба что я больше ничего не чувствую к дизайну. Буду рад если не отпишитесь так как я скоро открыл канал по видео. Вам спасибо и до

custom 52652278487124772773

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

29 May 2025, 21:10 UTC100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

29 May 2025, 21:10 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

꒰⠀ׄ⠀ ✧ 🤩ork 𓂅 如果 ~🤩dmin: Rafe ~🤩ime: 14 Minutes ~🤩eview: — ~🤩hp: — #Rafe #Practice

custom 52470263485426763551

Signed ‘ሏ—DICHTER’

29 May 2025, 18:51 UTC77 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Cherry #киннсинцю #киннэи #яинтроверт #ябоюсьлюдей

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Rafe209. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,258,057 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rafe — Designer|| ЗАКРЫТО” (@Rafe209), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rafe209.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.