Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

UltraFan

@RadioUltraFan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

516subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001495597813
TypeChannel
Username@RadioUltraFan
CreatedBetween 1 May 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RadioUltraFan

Growth

515516515.56 Aug 2026, 18:46 — 515 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:07 — 516 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:467 Aug 2026, 10:07
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 515–516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 10:07516+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:46515first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.0%
avg views ÷ 516 subscribers
Avg views / post
186
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (1 April 202629 July 2026)
Views total557
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

358 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15844.1%
6718.7%
👍359.78%
😁318.66%
🎉113.07%
❤‍🔥102.79%
🤣92.51%
🤨82.23%
💔51.40%
🆒30.838%
💯30.838%
🤡30.838%
🎅20.559%
👏20.559%
🤔20.559%
🎃10.279%
🏆10.279%
🗿10.279%
😎10.279%
😐10.279%
4 further kinds41.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC127 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @retrowavefactoryPhoto

❤️ Ретровейв 🌊

😁152

22 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC261 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mtvoldschoolVideo

Год назад не стало Оззи Осборна 💔

10❤‍🔥4💔1

3 Jul 2026, 03:44 UTC441 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Наконец-то нормальный фолк у нас в стране появился

👍6🆒2😁1

22 Jun 2026, 18:12 UTC440 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mtvoldschoolVideo

22 июня 1995 года Мэрилин Мэнсон выпустил кавер на песню "Sweet Dreams" 💿⚡

🔥134

12 Jun 2026, 15:02 UTC488 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мэнсон новый сингл выпустил.

🔥11

1 Jun 2026, 15:45 UTC484 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @retrowavefactoryVideo

Ретровейв 🌊

🤣9🔥2👍1🥰1

1 Jun 2026, 03:55 UTC418 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну вы поняли

11👍4💯3🎅2😐1

25 May 2026, 17:37 UTC434 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mtvoldschoolVideo

Вокалистка группы Guano Apes Сандра Насич отмечает сегодня 50-летие ⚡🤟

16🔥7

20 May 2026, 04:19 UTC509 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Мы очень любим Slipknot и очень счастливы, что они ненавидят нас, потому что это делает их музыку тяжелее, злее и настоящей!» — Фред Дёрст

🔥17😁4👍1

12 May 2026, 06:01 UTC551 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А нам 7 лет стукнуло. Впереди, как и полагается 7 летнему, нас ждут серьезные испытания, но мы справимся.

🔥32🎉11👍5🎃1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RadioUltraFan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UltraFan” (@RadioUltraFan), 516 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RadioUltraFan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.