Channel
@RadicalizationCentral
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001346680131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RadicalizationCentral |
| Created | 28 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RadicalizationCentral |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 27 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 27 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
So Instagram removed this video I put up last night of former CIA employee turned whistleblower Mary Embree discussing the infamous heart attack gun. It’s lethal & untraceable, they can make murders look like a natural occurrence with this gun. Why would Instagram be so desperate to remove this for false information? Its totally factual.
Signed Mac Tonight
⚠️ Breaking : The British government admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system of double-vaccinated people. The British government has admitted that after a double vaccination, one will never be able to acquire full natural immunity against the Covid variants - or possibly any other virus. So let's watch the "real" pandemic begin now! In its "COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report" for week 42, the …
Signed Mac Tonight
/ イ (((ヽ ( ノ ￣Y \ | ( \ (. /) | ) ヽ ヽ ` ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) _ノ / ＼ | ⌒Ｙ⌒ / / | ヽ | ﾉ ／ ＼トー仝ーイ | ミ土彡/ ) \ ° / ( \ / ) / / ѼΞΞΞΞΞΞΞD / / / \ \ \ ( ( ). ) ). ) ( ). ( | | | / …
Signed Mac Tonight
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Mac Tonight
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Mac Tonight
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Mac Tonight
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Mac Tonight
Repost time
Signed Mac Tonight
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Mac Tonight
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Mac Tonight
Hail.
Signed Mac Tonight
Big. Fuckin. Think. @AltSkullMirror
Signed Mac Tonight
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RadicalizationCentral. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RadicalizationCentral named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Societal Collapse” (@RadicalizationCentral), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RadicalizationCentral.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.