Channel
@RadarToTruth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
187subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001219616455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RadarToTruth |
| Description | RADAR - это авторский проект и метод который помогает превращать страхи, обиды и трудности в ступени роста и силы. Здесь вы найдете практические советы, вдохновение и мощные инструменты для обновления мышления. Связь: @RashidDarsigov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RadarToTruth |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 187 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 187 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
52 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 21 | 40.4% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 25.0% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 17.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 15.4% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Благодарю всех кто оставил комментарий под этим видео🔥❤️ Можно оставить свой отзыв и свои мысли относительно нашего сервиса под этим видео 👇 https://youtu.be/txI6Rv8DVC4 Скоро между всеми кто прокомментировал это видео разыграем 100 💵или 7500💸
ПОЛНЫЙ РАЗБОР OWAI STUDIO: ОТ «А» ДО «Я» 🚀 Друзья, вчера провели стратегическую презентацию, на которой закрыли все вопросы по нашему направлению. Это видео — фундамент. Если вы хотите понимать, как мы строим бизнес, на каких технологиях работаем и как здесь зарабатывать — это обязательный материал к просмотру. Почему это видео стоит посмотреть даже тем, кто уже «в теме»: ✅ Системный взгляд: Здесь всё разложено по…
Video message, posted without a caption
МЫ ОТКРЫВАЕМ НОВУЮ ЭРУ В OWAI STUDIO 🚀 Друзья, только что закончил 2-часовой разбор маркетинга с Анатолием. Послушайте аудио выше — я объясняю, почему мы сейчас заходим в самую жирную нишу этого года. ☝️☝️☝️ понимать: сейчас мы работаем в тестовом режиме. Мы настраиваем систему, постоянно внедряем обновления и готовимся к большому запуску. Возможны временные технические моменты, но именно сейчас закладывается фунда…
Мы сделали это. Предстарт большой истории OWAI Studio 🚀 Друзья, только что закончили встречу. На пике было 70 человек, и энергия была просто сумасшедшая. Спасибо каждому, кто был в онлайне — вы первые, кто увидел, как именно мы меняем правила игры в контенте и бизнесе. Мы не просто показали «сервис» — мы показали модель, которая позволяет превратить хаос в системный конвейер. Пока рынок «играет» в нейросети, мы уже…
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Коллеги, вопрос на засыпку. Сколько времени вы и ваша команда тратите на рутину? Кто-то до сих пор живет в бесконечных звонках, личных встречах и «трёшках». Я уважаю этот подход он дает результат, потому что отработан годами. Но давайте честно: многие в вашей команде не хотят звонить. Кому-то страшно приглашать, кто-то выгорает после десятого отказа. И в итоге ваш бизнес тормозит не из-за того, что продукт плохой, а…
Разница между «Механикой» и «Автоматом». Выбор за вами. Друзья, видео выше — это лишь макушка айсберга того, что мы сейчас готовим. До эфира осталось 3 часа. Пока 95% рынка продолжают «играть в нейросети», вручную сшивая промпты и видео (как на картинке слева), мы в OWAI Studio построили архитектуру, которая масштабируется сама. Сегодня в 18:00 МСК я покажу, как мы превратили технологию в полноценную контент-машин…
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RadarToTruth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 922,650 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RADAR - Ведущий к Истине” (@RadarToTruth), 187 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RadarToTruth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.