Channel
@Raceandphilosophy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003754167719 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Raceandphilosophy |
| Description | Investigações acerca do racialismo em sua dimensão orgânica e acidental, compreendido como realidade histórica e natural contingente, distinta de qualquer noção de essência metafísica fixa. |
| Created | 31 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Raceandphilosophy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 29 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 29 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 31 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (31 January 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 141 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
27 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 14 | 51.9% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 18.5% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Ele me impõe um etíope como genro, um berbere como marido. A horrenda criança mestiça assusta seu berço." - Claudius Claudianus 398 AD 🇮🇹 Fonte: A Guerra Contra Gildo, rotulado como Poema XV 🇮🇹
⚡1💯1
"Helena de Troia não é branca" – 🥴 🇬🇷Como os autores de língua grega descrevem Helena de Troia: "Então um mensageiro foi até Helena, de braços brancos" -Homero Fonte: Ilíada "Eu te comparo à Helena loira"-Safo Fonte: Os Poemas Completos de Safo, de Willis Barnstone "Mas Helena não lamentou: a vergonha a consumia olhos azul-escuros" - Quinto de Esmirna Fonte: A Queda de Troia, Livro 14
⚡3👌1
Canal onde será postado traduções originais de livros nunca antes traduzidos como os livros de Aajonus Vonderplanitz.
👏2💊1
https://t.me/infoshazard
Não temos uniformidade racial Não há quem não faça a distinção entre um negro e um branco. Não há quem não faça a distinção perfeita entre um nortista braquiplaticefálico, moreno, e um louro do Paraná, de Santa Catarina ou do Rio Grande do Sul. Não há quem não saiba reconhecer um caboclo, um cafuzo ou um mulato. O vulgo, até mesmo, é mais perito nessas distinções do que o intelectual. As diferenças raciais, entre n…
👌2
𝑮𝒆𝒏𝒖𝒔 𝒆𝒕 𝒑𝒉𝒊𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒐𝒑𝒉𝒊𝒂 pinned «https://telegra.ph/As-no%C3%A7%C3%B5es-de-ess%C3%AAncia-e-acidente-negam-o-conceito-de-ra%C3%A7a-Uma-resposta-para-cat%C3%B3licos-ditos-tomistas-06-13-2»
https://telegra.ph/As-no%C3%A7%C3%B5es-de-ess%C3%AAncia-e-acidente-negam-o-conceito-de-ra%C3%A7a-Uma-resposta-para-cat%C3%B3licos-ditos-tomistas-06-13-2
🔥5
Channel name was changed to «𝑮𝒆𝒏𝒖𝒔 𝒆𝒕 𝒑𝒉𝒊𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒐𝒑𝒉𝒊𝒂»
Ser contra a miscigenação irrestrita não é, de modo algum, rejeitar a formação histórica do Brasil. Quem afirma isso confunde duas coisas completamente distintas: participação no processo histórico e fundamento civilizacional. É evidente que negros, pardos e indígenas tiveram influência na cultura brasileira, e é igualmente verdadeiro que alguns indivíduos mestiços produziram obras relevantes na alta cultura. Isso, p…
⚡2❤1
Oque é raça? Raça é um conjunto populacional humano historicamente derivado, caracterizado por padrões estatisticamente estáveis de ancestralidade compartilhada, resultantes de isolamento geográfico relativo e processos microevolutivos, detectáveis por correlações multilocus no genoma. Raças humanas não são tipos biológicos essenciais nem categorias taxonômicas fortes, mas correspondem a estruturas populacionais rea…
⚡5
Bem-vindo ao canal. Aqui tratamos do racialismo acidentalista orgânico como uma chave de leitura histórica, antropológica e cultural da realidade dos povos — entendendo a raça como um dado orgânico e contingente, não como essência metafísica nem como dogma ideológico. O objetivo do canal é investigar seriamente o tema, reunindo textos, PDFs e referências diversas para estudo e comparação de perspectivas. Nem todo mat…
⚡3
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Raceandphilosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 789,419 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑮𝒆𝒏𝒖𝒔 𝒆𝒕 𝒑𝒉𝒊𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒐𝒑𝒉𝒊𝒂” (@Raceandphilosophy), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Raceandphilosophy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.