Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tumatov.Lab

@RUSTumatov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

159subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003399028265
TypeChannel
Username@RUSTumatov
DescriptionУютный канал. Профессия, мнение, бизнес, наука и химия.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/RUSTumatov

Growth

1597 Aug 2026, 17:56 — 159 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:31 — 159 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:568 Aug 2026, 17:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 158–160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:31159no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:56159first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.7%
avg views ÷ 159 subscribers
Avg views / post
95.0
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total950
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
97
Videos
5
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 59s
Average length
3m 59s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2446.2%
🔥1325.0%
😁59.62%
💯47.69%
👍35.77%
👏35.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас слежу за судебным процессом по делу экс-главы «Узбекнефтегаза» Баходиржона Сиддикова. Для многих это очередной громкий заголовок, но для меня - тема, к которой трудно относиться абсолютно отстраненно, так как мы знакомы лично. Знаю Баходиржона как очень осторожного, взвешенного и глубоко информированного человека. В обществе сейчас виден колоссальный запрос на справедливость и прозрачность, особенно на фоне за

🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Эффективный менеджмент эффективен и в 1974 году.

2 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

КРИЗИС - писец смог подобраться заметно) Любой классический учебник говорит: за спадом всегда идет рост. Почистили рынок от слабых игроков, снизили ставки - и пошла аплитуда вверх. Но посмотрите вокруг. Амплитуда падения растянулась на годы, а рост стал похож на короткую погрешность. Кризис сегодня не отраслевой и не страновой. Он мировой. Но самое интересное - как на него реагируют государства. Почти везде мы видим

3

31 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC86 viewsread 8 August 2026

Почему я не верю в скачок углехимии в ближайшие годы. Пока мир пытается снижать углеродный след, масштабный запуск углехимии выглядит как экологический и финансовый нонсенс. Проекты вроде CTL (получение топлива из угля) требуют колоссальных объемов воды - до 5-7 литров на литр топлива, что абсолютно губительно в условиях острого дефицита водных ресурсов. Кроме того, выбросы CO2 и токсичных отходов здесь в разы выше,

28 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC113 viewsread 8 August 2026

Читал про KPI на канале Аскара Исмаилова: https://t.me/pacedot/2686 Долги большие, согласен, реально все так плохо? Не могу согласиться с частью утверждения, но неужели все так как пишет автор? 👇 Завод убивают финансово отрицательной маржой, дорогими долгами, непрозрачным сбытом, зависимостью от стратегического конкурента и постепенным обесцениванием государственной доли.

28 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC92 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ох, и не просто-то нашей малой химии... https://t.me/argus_price_agency/1594

27 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот так, тебе 19 лет, открываешь магазин Евросеть в Ташкенте и думаешь в каком классном месте работаешь, что будет 10 000 магазинов, у тебя будет жёлтый Гелендваген. Кто сказал, что независимый мобильный ритейл нежизнеспособная модель? Собственник уедет в UK? Да кому нужна розница, есть же нефть и газ) Контрабанда телефонов - разве это незаконно?) Всё же так делают, но бирку, что у нас 100% белые телефоны мы повесим

5

26 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC88 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наблюдаю сейчас за рынком Казахстана и собственниками МСБ. Картинка складывается классическая, но от этого не менее маргинальная. Экономику штормит с нескольких сторон сразу: - Новый Налоговый кодекс. - Покупательная способность просела: население закредитовано, базовая ставка сохраняется высокой, чеки падают. - Логистика, импортное сырьё и ФОТ только дорожают. Бизнес оказался в тисках: сверху давят падающие продажи

👏3🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

К 40 годам меняется не только цифра в паспорте, но и оптика. Все, кто со мной давно, знают: я всегда был скептиком и противником иностранных инвестиций. Казалось, что упор нужно делать строго на внутренние ресурсы и максимальную автономию. Но реальная практика - с производством, цепями поставок и реальными издержками - рано или поздно вносит коррективы. Пусть дорого. Пусть дешево. Пусть выгодно или не очень. Экономик

2

14 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC174 viewsread 8 August 2026

Проект RenewChem (Catalyxx + Arkema + Evonik) - Новая точка роста. Буквально на днях консорциум во главе с технологической компанией Catalyxx получил грант ЕС в размере €20 млн. на строительство первого в Европе коммерческого завода по производству био-абсолютированных спиртов высшего порядка. ​Сырье: Био-эталон. ​Продукты: «Drop-in» био-спирта, молекулярно идентичные своим нефтехимическим аналогам. ​В чем фишка: Уча

6 Jul 2026, 21:16 UTC257 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

​Заметил, что при обсуждении ударов по российским НПЗ все упорно считают пробитые колонны, выбитые мощности и кубометры сгоревшего топлива. ​Но мало кто говорит о главном скрытом эффекте, который имеет четкий отложенный характер. Речь о катализаторах и их сроке службы. И если не создавать интригу: эти НПЗ во многом и так должны были остановиться. ​Физический ремонт железа после прилета занимает недели. А вот настоящи

💯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RUSTumatov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tumatov.Lab” (@RUSTumatov), 159 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RUSTumatov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.