Channel
@RUAtheist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
383subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001041342352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RUAtheist |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RUAtheist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 383 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 382 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 382 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
165 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 95 | 57.6% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 29.7% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 4.24% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 3.03% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.82% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.82% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.21% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.606% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2024 to 12 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
___________________________________________________________ Совсем не нахожу сил писать, но нужно, а то мозги завянут. И так как я в Израиле, будет, наверное, много постов про здешние порядки или навеянные ими темы. Вот, например, я считаю что большинство священников из разных религий скорее мошенники, чем искренне верующие. А вы представляете их искренне несущими свои убеждения в массы?
👍13👎1
Signed Nizlomolog
В сети новый скандал. Netflix снял фильм про Марию мать Иисуса и попал под раздачу буквально всех. Христиане обвиняют производителей фильма в ереси за то, что они показывают Марию слишком обычной женщиной, рожающей Иисуса в муках, пропалестинские движения возмущены тем, что Netflix посмел снять еврейскую актрису в роли Марии. В исламистских криках для меня показательны 2 момента: 1. Они на полном серьёзе ретроспектив…
🔥21👍3
Signed Nizlomolog
Atheist. Humanist. Freethinker pinned «Дорогие читатели! Посмотрев на результаты прошлого опроса, а также на идею всего канала, я поняла, что размышлениям об основаниях религии и свободомыслия нужно своё пространство. Теория религиоведения и практика современного свободомыслия - сферы слишком большие…»
Дорогие читатели! Посмотрев на результаты прошлого опроса, а также на идею всего канала, я поняла, что размышлениям об основаниях религии и свободомыслия нужно своё пространство. Теория религиоведения и практика современного свободомыслия - сферы слишком большие и различные, чтобы органично следовать в одном потоке. Я начинаю совершенно новый канал "Верю и не верю", в котором сосредоточусь на академическом рассмотрен…
👍15
Signed Екатерина Коростиченко
Atheist. Humanist. Freethinker pinned «Нас перевалило за 400, с чем всех и поздравляю! Чтобы сделать наш канал ещё лучше, проводим небольшой опрос. Какая информация вам наиболее интересна? Выберите один или несколько вариантов:»
Нас перевалило за 400, с чем всех и поздравляю! Чтобы сделать наш канал ещё лучше, проводим небольшой опрос. Какая информация вам наиболее интересна? Выберите один или несколько вариантов:
The shares total 288%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍7🔥5
Signed Екатерина Коростиченко
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Екатерина Коростиченко
Читая автобиографию Льва Николаевича Толстого, уже в первой главе сталкиваешься с его откровенным признанием в свободомыслии. "Отпадение мое от веры произошло во мне так же, как оно происходило и происходит теперь в людях нашего склада образования. Оно, как мне кажется, происходит в большинстве случаев так: люди живут так, как все живут, а живут все на основании начал, не только не имеющих ничего общего с веро…
👍20
Signed Екатерина Коростиченко
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Екатерина Коростиченко
Вокизм и культура отмены в США - видимо, норма, а сопротивление этим явлениям карается. На этот раз Facebook, без судебных решений, как и раньше, заблокировал аккаунт Ричарда Докинза - вроде бы за критику золотого призера олимпийских игр по боксу Имана Хелифа. Оригинальное сообщение найти не удалось. Даже непонятно, в твиттере (который Х) оно было или в фейсбук. Но Докинз, по его словам, лишь выразил свое мнение, чт…
👍6😡5😭3🤡2
Signed Екатерина Коростиченко
Приятно была удивлена, что в Дананге работает "философская лаборатория", и ведёт её мой бывший коллега из Института философии. Говорили вчера про то, как культура влияет на язык, а язык - на мировоззрение его носителей. Конечно же, коснулись концепции лингвистической относительности (гипотеза Сепира—Уорфа). В её сильном варианте утверждается, что язык определяет мышление, а в слабом - что влияет на него. Вот известны…
🔥12👍2
Signed Екатерина Коростиченко
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Екатерина Коростиченко
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @RUAtheist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нас перевалило за 400, с чем всех и поздравляю! Чтобы сделать наш канал ещё лучше, проводим небольшой опрос. Какая информация вам наиболее интересна? Выберите один или несколько вариантов:
The shares total 288%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2024 to 12 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,121,700 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Atheist. Humanist. Freethinker” (@RUAtheist), 383 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RUAtheist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.