Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RP-PRIVATE

Channel

RP-PRIVATE

@RPprivate

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

168subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001929685883
TypeChannel
Username@RPprivate
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RPprivate

Growth

168169168.57 August 2026 — 169 subscribers8 August 2026 — 169 subscribers14 August 2026 — 168 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:14168-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:15169no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:46169first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 168 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 December 20256 August 2026)
Views total102
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
550.0%
👍550.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC13 viewsread 8 August 2026

💢انواع خندیدن به انگلیسی 🔸Smile لبخند زدن 🔸Laugh معمول ترین لغت در مورد خنده 🔸Giggle با خنده چیزی را گفتن 🔸Chuckle با دهان بسته و آرام خندیدن 🔸Smirk لبخند مغرورانه زدن، پوزخند زدن 🔸Snicker خندیدن به چیزیه که شاید اصلا خنده دار نباشه 🔸Cackle با صدای بلند خندیدن ، قاه قاه خندیدن در واقع 🔸Chortle خنده به خاطر اینکه چیز خوب و لذت بخشی اتفاق افتاده 🔸Titter پوزخند زدن 🔸Snigger خنده تمسخر آمیز 💢Point 🔶be not that + ad

31 Jul 2026, 06:10 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026

✅ بعد از افعال زیر، فعل بعدی بایستی بصورت ing دار (اسم مصدر) باشد : avoid, enjoy, involve, look forward to, imagine, deny, mind, suggest, be worth, finish, delay, try, resist, keep, mention, practice, postpone 🔸کاربرد stop: پایان یافتن عملی است که در حال انجام می‌باشد. در این حالت هیچ رابطۀ علت و معلولی بین دو فعل وجود ندارد. I stopped working for them last year. (من سال گذشته کار کردن برای آنها را متوقف کردم)

24 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026

Grammatical 👨‍🏫👩‍🏫: 🏨 At the hospital VS in the hospital حالا فرق اینا چیه !!؟ زمانی که به عنوان بیمار به بیمارستان مراجعه کرده باشیم از in the hospital استفاده میکنیم . و زمانی که برای ملاقات و یا هر علت دیگه ای ( بجز به عنوان بیمار )به بیمارستان مراجعه کرده باشیم از at the hospital استفاده میکنیم 👈حالا به مثال های زیر توجه کنید : John was hospitalized after the accident and is still in the hospital. Don'

17 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

‍‍ ♻️فرق arrive at و arrive in ❇️ اگر مقصد را به شکل یک نقطه (یا مکان) در نظر بگیرید، باید از حرف اضافه at استفاده کنید . ❇️اگر مقصد را به شکل یک ناحیه ببینید، باید از حرف اضافه in استفاده کنید. ✅- اگر مقصد یک شهر کوچک، یک ساختمان و یا بخشی از یک ساختمان است، از حرف اضافه at استفاده کنید. مثلاً: 1️⃣چه زمانی به اداره پست می رسی. 1️⃣When do you arrive at the post office. 2️⃣I had already gone before he arrived

10 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC43 viewsread 8 August 2026

📣 صدای اشیای مختلف 🔑The keys are jingling. کلیدها دارن جیرینگ جیرینگ می کنن. 💰The coins are rattling. سکه ها دارن جرینگ جرینگ صدا میدن. 👠The heels are clacking. پاشنه های کفش دارن تق تق صدا میدهند. 🪭The fan is whirring. پنکه داره وز وز میکنه.(صدای چرخیدن) 💨The wind is howling. باد داره هوهو میکنه. 🕰 The clock is ticking. ساعت داره تیک تیک میکنه. 🥄The spoon is clinking. قاشق داره جرینگ جرینگ صدا میده. ⛲️The

10 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026

اشتباه رایج 👨‍🏫 برای صحبت از فردی با قد متوسط، از اصطلاح of medium/average height استفاده‌ می‌شود. مثال: The escaped prisoner is of medium-height and was last seen wearing a green tracksuit. زندانی فراری قد متوسط دارد و.... ◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆ ✍ با توجه با توضیحات، جملات زیر اشتباه هستند: ❌ She is a medium-height smartly-dressed woman. ❌ The police wish to interview an average height man with long black hair. شکل صحیح

26 Jun 2026, 09:05 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026

Grammatical 👨‍🏫👩‍🏫: 🌟تفاوت if و whether if و whether از کلمات ربط دهنده در زبان انگلیسی هستند که برای اتصال دو یا چند جمله واره یا جمله بکار می‌روند. اگرچه در محاوره و نوشتار غیررسمی این دو کلمه اغلب به جای هم استفاده می‌شوند اما در نوشتار رسمی بهتر است بین این دو تمایز قائل شوید زیرا هر یک از آنها می‌تواند معنای جمله را تغییر دهد. 🌟قاعده کلی این است که if را در جملات شرطی استفاده کنیم و whether را زمانی بکار ببریم

19 Jun 2026, 16:26 UTC174 viewsread 8 August 2026

2️⃣ جمله‌ی غلط: ❌ After reading the original study, the article remains unconvincing. فاعل the article است. معنی: پس از اینکه مقاله مطالعه‌ی اولیه را خواند (!).... 🖋 جمله‌ی اصلاح‌شده 👇 ✅ After reading the original study, I find the article unconvincing. فاعل جمله‌ی بالا باید یک انسان باشد. معنی: من، پس از اینکه مطالعات اولیه را خواندم، ... 3️⃣ یک مثال اشتباه دیگر: ❌ Having bitten the postman, the farmer decided to

19 Jun 2026, 16:23 UTC39 viewsread 8 August 2026

💢درخواست مودبانه: 🟠Would you mind + فعل + ing میشه کمکم کنید؟ 🔸Would you mind helping me? میشه در رو ببندید؟ 🔹Would you mind closing the door? میشه اون رو تکرار کنید؟ 🔸Would you mind repeating that? میشه بیرون سیگار بکشید؟ 🔹Would you mind smoking outside? میشه بعدا زنگ بزنید؟ 🔸Would you mind calling back later? میشه آروم صحبت کنید؟ 🔹Would you mind speaking slowly? @RPprivate

12 Jun 2026, 10:48 UTC57 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔶به جای very tired بگو : 🔷Exhausted "خسته" 🔶به جای very beautiful بگو : 🔷Gorgeous "باشکوه" 🔶به جای very sad بگو : 🔷Heart broken "دل شکسته" 🔶 جای very happy بگو : 🔷Thrilled "هیجان زده" 🔶به جای very surprised بگو : 🔷Amazed "حیرت زده" 🔶به جای very bad بگو : 🔷Terrible "وحشتناک" 🔶به جای very small بگو : 🔷Tiny "کوچیک" 🟠روش های مختلف گفتن: من گشنمه 🔸I'm hungry من گشنمه 🔹I'm starving خیلی گشنمه 🔸I'm famished

27 Feb 2026, 13:31 UTC100 viewsread 8 August 2026

🧶 این پست قصد داریم کاربرد و تفاوت as و like در زبان انگلیسی که باعث اشتباه خیلی از زبان آموزها میشه رو یاد بگیریم. کلمات as و like میتونن نقش حرف اضافه یا حرف ربط رو تو جمله بازی کنن. این دو کلمه به عنوان حرف اضافه معنی متفاوتی دارن. ⚜تفاوت as و like 📌1. زمانی که حرف اضافه as همراه با اسم میاد معنای “در نقش” یا “به عنوان” میگیره. حرف اضافه like هم همراه با اسم معنای “مثل” یا “همانند” میگیره. برای درک بهتر این موض

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RPprivate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 471,259 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RP-PRIVATE” (@RPprivate), 168 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RPprivate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.