Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‌‌ ‌‌‌‌𝗤&𝗔 ⦙ ѕυρρσят

@RPSUPPORTSQA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

180subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002199499998
TypeChannel
Username@RPSUPPORTSQA
Description𓄹 𝖠𝗅𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝖽. 𝖯𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗄
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/RPSUPPORTSQA

Growth

1809 Aug 2026, 18:49 — 180 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:00 — 180 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:499 Aug 2026, 19:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 179–181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 19:00180no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:49180first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.1%
avg views ÷ 180 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.1
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (28 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total1,622
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
26
Videos
9
Links
386

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭927.3%
618.2%
🤡515.2%
🦄412.1%
🫡39.09%
🐳26.06%
👍26.06%
🔥26.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC85 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @XBCHATBOT

https://t.me/RPSUPPORTSQA/1852 ببین دوست عزیز تو میتونی برای پلیر هات جایزه بزار کسی که پلیر میاره فلان ایتم یا اینقدر پول بازی میدم بهش بری توی گپ پلیر گو چیه اسمش یادم نیست مال همین نکسوس فورج همیشه یکی پیدا میشه میگه اقا یه گیم با فلان مشخصات می‌خوام تو بهش گیم خودت معرفی بهش و معمولا قبول میکنند یه مدت تست میکنند اگر خوب بهشون حال داده باشه میمونند حالت بعدی اینه که سعی کنید توی گپ ها و نیوز ها فعال باشی ک

3

30 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC82 viewsread 9 August 2026

شرمسارم الان مغزم کار نمیده فکر کنم فعلا اگه دوستان پیشنهادی دارن بدن

30 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC79 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @XBCHATBOT

برای جذب پلیر برای آرپی چه راهکارهایی پیشنهاد می‌کنید؟ تب و نیوز رو امتحان کردم ولی فعلا نتیجه‌ای نگرفتم دوست دارم تجربه‌هاتون رو بدونم

28 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

جدا از اینکه کلا آدمیزاد دنبال راه های آسونتره، اصولا آینده نامعلوم توی ایران نمی‌ارزه که حتی اگ میتونی و تمرکزشو داری، مثل گذشته بشینی و سر کد ها زجه بزنی

🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

نه ببین اینی که میگی نهایتا برای من و تو و کسایی که امتحانامون تشریحی و کپی پیست جوابه صدق کنه این بندگان خدا برای کامپیوتر و کدنویسی و هزار جور چیزای پیچیده‌ای ai استفاده میکنن که قبل از ai، مردم با زجه مینشستن پاش

🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @XBCHATBOT

https://t.me/RPSUPPORTSQA/1847 می‌دونم احتمالا خیلیا دوست ندارن متن طولانی بخونن attention span مردم امروزی خیلی اومده پایین، پس میذارم اینو تو quotes. عوامل پشت صحنه تا قبلش چیکار میکردن؟ من خودم از ai برای امتحاناتم استفاده کردم، اینو میتونم اعتراف کنم ولی گوگل هم وجود داره. سایت های مختلف وجود دارن که میتونین یه سوال درست شبیه سوال امتحانتون پیدا کنین و فقط جای‌گذاری کنین. تحصیلتون به ai بند نیست. به خودتون بنده.

🤡5

28 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC92 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

دوستان از پشت صحنه گفتند گوه نخور کل وضعیت تحصیل ما به ai وابسته‌ست

🫡3🐳2😭1

28 Jul 2026, 08:08 UTC92 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

حس میکنم هممون دیگه انسان های خسته تری هستیم نسبت به قبل آدم گاهی آرزو میکنه کاش هیچکس ai نداشت

😭6

28 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC93 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @XBCHATBOT

https://t.me/RPSUPPORTSQA/1842 نه نه منظورم اون قضایا و جمع اوری اطلاعات نبود خودم هم وقتی چیزی با سرچ کردن پیدا نمیشه میرم سراغش. ببین منظورم یسری چیز ها توی رول پلی که تا الان با ذهن خود ادمین راوی و اونر ها ساخته می شده و مخصوصا کارای هنری مثل نقاشی اوسی و ساختش و اینها...سیستم و اینا، حتی گاهی دیدم توی رول معمایی یا ماجرایی وقتی کوچکترین جایی گیر میکنن و سریع میرن پیش هوش مصنوعی، اینا...

👍2

28 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC73 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

اینام بنده های خدا هستند خدا اینا رو هم شفا میده

😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RPSUPPORTSQA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌‌ ‌‌‌‌𝗤&𝗔 ⦙ ѕυρρσят” (@RPSUPPORTSQA), 180 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RPSUPPORTSQA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.