Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фанаты Сварога, Сэма, Скрюллума, Цыца и Ликурга (Honkai Star Rail)

Channel

Фанаты Сварога, Сэма, Скрюллума, Цыца и Ликурга (Honkai Star Rail)

@ROBOTSKINN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

258subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882399557
TypeChannel
Username@ROBOTSKINN
DescriptionОбожаем, крутим и ни только наших роботов из HSR 🤖🩶 🤖Чат общения: https://t.me/+FD5eFwfYUWg5M2Qy 🤖Бот тейк: @FavoriteRobotsBot 🤖Все вопросы по рекламе и т.д: @BretaneWork13
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ROBOTSKINN

Growth

25815 Aug 2026, 10:47 — 258 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 11:00 — 258 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 10:4715 Aug 2026, 11:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 257–259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 11:00258no change
15 Aug 2026, 10:47258first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.4%
avg views ÷ 258 subscribers
Avg views / post
115
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held18 (15 April 202614 August 2026)
Views total458
Reactions total116
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
612
Videos
59
Links
222

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 34s
Average length
2m 31s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

541 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20537.9%
🔥9116.8%
💘7513.9%
custom 5379649316530975859529.61%
💋336.10%
❤‍🔥274.99%
😭274.99%
custom 5380038891539558242122.22%
💔101.85%
🙏40.739%
💯30.555%
custom 537975794484382760720.37%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 541reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC64 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Арита и симпатичный робот на стриме, что думаете? #щп

20🔥6🙏4💋1custom 53796493165309758591

13 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC90 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026

У наших коллег появился лорный канал посвященный Скрюллуму, залетайте 🌟:: https://t.me/Screwllum_76 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⚙️: #Скрюллум ; #ВсяИнформацияОПерсонажах

11custom 53796493165309758594💋1

12 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC117 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Скрюллум не станет игровым в ближайшее время ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⚙️: #Скрюллум ; #Новости Cr слив: hxg ; картинка: @ materpssss (Pint)

😭27💔102💋1

21 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC187 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Что думаем? 🌟 Спасибо за предложку🤍 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⚙️: #Скрюллум ; #Мем Неанон: Янчик

💋158🔥4custom 53796493165309758591

10 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC290 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Прошло больше года с первого появления Ликурга 🌟 Выскажите мнение о нём спустя столько времени ! ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⚙️: #Ликург ; #Арт Cr: @rakuychi ( 𝕏 )

24💘11🔥2custom 53800388915395582421

6 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC319 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Что говоришь? #Скрюллум

💘92custom 53796493165309758591

3 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC303 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Шлем Ликурга добавят в магазин Арбитра 🌟 Покупаем? ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤖 : #Ликург

❤‍🔥18🔥9custom 538003889153955824243💯2💘1custom 53796493165309758591

1 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC249 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @hsrredditPhoto

🎵 «Вариации на тему первого гения» | Зандар: Яснопея «Давно не виделись. Погода на Амфореусе просто чудесная, влажный бриз пропитан ароматом солнца... А я как раз вышел поискать вдохновения для нового эксперимента. Может, прогуляемся вместе по пляжу, послушаем эхо морских раковин?» 🇨🇳 Китайский CV: 赵君毅 🇯🇵 Японский CV: 唐戸俊太郎 🇰🇷 Корейский CV: 박기욱 Reddit | HSR

14❤‍🔥4💘1custom 53796493165309758591

1 Jun 2026, 07:27 UTC266 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Всех с первым днем лета и сразу: сдающим удачи, школьникам отдохнуть, студентам сочувствую, рабочим сил Нагружены админы очень сильно эти два месяца, просим прощение за отсутствие контента 🌟

21custom 53796493165309758591

15 May 2026, 06:05 UTC354 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Определено да ! Спасибо за предложку 💕 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤖 : #Ликург ; #Мем

24🔥5💯1custom 53796493165309758591

9 May 2026, 07:27 UTC314 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

С 9 мая дорогие 🌟

💘13custom 53796493165309758593custom 53800388915395582421

1 May 2026, 08:13 UTC391 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026

С первым мая трудяги 🌟

17custom 53796493165309758596custom 53800388915395582424custom 53797579448438276072

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ROBOTSKINN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,142,887 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фанаты Сварога, Сэма, Скрюллума, Цыца и Ликурга (Honkai Star Rail)” (@ROBOTSKINN), 258 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ROBOTSKINN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.