Channel
@RLISTF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001320087656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RLISTF |
| Description | Schizoid ramblings & random reads |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RLISTF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 14 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 14 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
My interview on the Jerm Warfare Podcast is out! Understanding ECDO Theory and how The Giza Pyramids play into its tenets. https://youtu.be/h8t4di3UgrU?si=79XM2jfV6jt7Kfb3 @EthicalSkeptic
Signed Sean
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTBSt67y6/
Signed Sean
Each picture is worth a thousand words. World data reveals the lies. Covid wasn't a major killer; but the so-called covid "vaccines" definitely are. @EthicalSkeptic
Signed Sean
Most of you already saw Angela's post. Here's the full story, in my own words: Most of you know me as the face behind Dot Connecting Anons — the breaking news, the daily roundups, the information war I've been fighting in the trenches alongside you for so many years. I gave that freely, because I believed it mattered. I still do. What most of you don't know is what's been happening behind the scenes. My husband a…
Signed Sean
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYNnxkISlJd/?igsh=NjAzN3BjdzdyNmx4
Signed Sean
https://open.substack.com/pub/cognitivecarbon/p/area-51-s4-and-bob-lazar-the-new
Signed Sean
https://open.substack.com/pub/cognitivecarbon/p/the-earths-north-pole-is-shiftingand?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=bgo58
Signed Sean
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTkHhMEEg/
Signed Sean
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZThE4QTWe/
Signed Sean
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Sean
https://www.mensjournal.com/news/william-mccasland-missing-retired-general-some-draw-parallels-to-nancy-guthrie
Signed Sean
The latest ECDO confirmations: 86 of 108 ancient monuments = 79.6% exhibit obsequience. The probability against random alignment now exceeds the numerical range my HP-15C can represent in scientific notation. …along with the most widely recognized composite of ancient cartography. The case continues to strengthen. 😎 @EthicalSkeptic
Signed Sean
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RLISTF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A Plague of Autie Frogs” (@RLISTF), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RLISTF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.