➡️⭐️🥹НАБОР В КОЛЛАБ🥹📍 1. Путешественник / Путешественница @blllodi 2. Джинн @Guar0nTine 3. Эмбер @designisaaq 4. Лиза 5. Кэйа @Ne2Daport 6. Барбара 7. Дилюк @ANPU7480 8. Рэйзор 9. Венти @altrssm 10. Кли @BLDRUNN 11. Беннет @DTYIZ 12. Ноэлль @H1S3O 13. Фишль @asteriskqww 14. Сахароза 15. Мона @Gypsy_PORT 16. Сяо @hoshino_PORT 17. Бэй Доу 18. Нин Гуан @nodrugsprt 19. Сян Лин 20. Син Цю @SatiraPJ 21. Чун Юнь @kisli8n 22…

Channel
. ℛitsu : ✸ !!
@RITSUXP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
134subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002268217430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RITSUXP |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RITSUXP |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 134 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 136 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 136 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.4%
- avg views ÷ 134 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 26.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 16.7%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2025 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 52 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
650 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 237 | 36.5% | |
| 🔥 | 156 | 24.0% | |
| 🆒 | 154 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5429180713339483891 | 52 | 8.00% | |
| custom 5429243106329389164 | 48 | 7.38% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.462% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 650 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2025 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 23
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
- Most on one post
- 18
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RITSUXP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2025 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Тут скоро три подписчика останется Ждите новый альбом чапелл роан через три года и тогда может быть я сделаю работу
💘5🆒1
ᅠᅠ﹫ — OLIVIA RODRIGO ! ᡣ𐭩 You seem pretty sad for a girl so in love ᅠᅠᅠ#BANNER REPOST/REACTION ⇶
🔥21🆒15💘14
ᅠᅠᅠᅠ﹫ — CIPHER ! ᡣ𐭩 Оно живое лайкните в тиктоке рібята ᅠᅠᅠ #EDIT REPOST/REACTION ⇶
🆒9🔥7💘6
Мои итоги года.✌️✌️ Таблицу взяла у https://t.me/anx03port БЫЛО очень много хороших работ которые я сюда хотела вставить, мб как-то попозже переделаю в свою личную табличку. У меня определенно лютый прогресс под конец мая двинул 😭 его реально видно это супер круто Какая у вас моя любимая работа за год?
💘10🆒5🔥1
ᅠᅠᅠ﹫ — DED BLONDE ! ᡣ𐭩 Суженный ряженый #BANNER REPOST/REACTION ⇶
🆒19🔥16💘14
ᅠᅠᅠ ﹫ — CYRENE ! ᡣ𐭩 #BANNER First day we met? ОНО ЖИВОЕ. Около баннер спустя три месяца!!! REPOST/REACTION ⇶
💘24🆒9🔥6
ᅠᅠᅠ﹫ — BLACK SWAN ! ᡣ𐭩 Тун тун сагур впервые такое делаю мне нравится #BANNER REPOST/REACTION ⇶
💘30custom 542924310632938916426custom 542918071333948389125
ᅠᅠᅠ﹫ — MY KINK IS KARMA ! ᡣ𐭩 People say I'm jealous, but my kink is watching . . . You ruin your life, you losing your mind. You thinking I care People say I'm jealous, but my kink is karma #BANNER REPOST/REACTION
custom 542918071333948389127custom 542924310632938916422💘19🕊3
ㅤㅤ ㅤ ﹫. ℛ𝗶𝘁𝘀𝘂. c𝘰m 、 ㅤ price anon me tags crush list cr png ㅤㅤSweet religion, Blood is spilling, blood is spilling. ㅤSweet religion, Prosecute the weak and willing. ㅤㅤI've been here so long . . . For the love of God
💘32🔥26🆒26
0:28
💘5🆒5🔥4
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RITSUXP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@alletportfolio · 501 post᯽ 𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝒉𝒚𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒂
@arctichysteria · 261 post꒰ ͜︵ ׄ arumi design ִ ︵͜ ꒱
@arumiportfolio · 151 postЧИСТКА 𝒫𝖠𝖱𝖠𝖣𝖨𝖲 ℛ𝖮𝖲𝖤
@asteriskqww · 1171 postМЕГА РЕСТ# .OHH DAMN*ᅠ...
@Astrid345678 · 2971 post≡ㅤ᛬𝗮𝘆ֺ𝗮𝘂'𝘀 𓏼ᵖᵒʳᵗᶠ ⁾
@ayauportf · 1441 post〔 愛 〕— 𝖡𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗄.𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅
@blankssin · 1691 postархив Bladǝ runnǝr
@BLDRUNN · 1351 post𐙚 . ℭ𝔞𝔭𝔦𝔱𝔞𝔫𝔬⁶⁷
@capitanoill · 151 post𓏳꯭㜼𝅾▋ ﹩𝗡꯭݈ٜؐ𑪕6𝆀Y3𝆂𝗫ﳴ꫶𝆺 🂡𝅻🁫
@CBRT3RR0R · 2101 post✿𝆬 ִֶָ ‧𝓓𝓲𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓣𝓸𝓻𝓲 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓯𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓸 ̸‹ ャ ִֶָ ‧
@Dising_Tori · 501 postРест Ꮶᴇfiᴇᵈˢᵍᶰ
@dsgnkefie · 531 post.#𝗟𝗘𝗧'𝗦-𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗬(!).
@DTYIZ · 531 post꒰ ׄ ✧ Σ𐌌ρ꤯꤅ꤕ ᨦïᨩ 𑀉ꤌ𐌌𐌌ꤕ꤅𑀱 . ꪆ ꪆ
@Emp1L4mm · 861 postссылка и свалка для ботов
@eS1nfQ · 21 postрест 𓏴 𝕬𝖓𝗫𝖎été | 𝗩𝖎𝖚𝖘𝕳 ۪ 谷
@fateviush · 1351 post₊𖥔 ' Guaran Tine ! . .
@Guar0nTine · 621 post˗ˏˋ Boom! ´ˎ˗
@Gypsy_PORT · 321 postRest # 𝓚𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑦𝑎
@H1S3O · 661 postРест 𑣲⋆ inteautu ⋆. 𐙚 ˚
@inteautu · 851 postЧИСТКА 悪魔⃞ㅤ𝔏IAN ࣳ
@kisli8n · 1381 postРЕСТㅤ┄℘𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝕷iɱo
@Limo_nista · 461 postˎ ⫶ . ៸៸𝕷͠𝖮𝖨𝖲 𝐏𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐓𝕺𝕸 ❯
@loisport · 2041 postrest @ R
@mirayvingmkm · 1421 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“. ℛitsu : ✸ !!” (@RITSUXP), 134 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RITSUXP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.