Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝕯𝐈𝐀𝗥𝐘 𝕽𝐈𝕿𝐀 𝐒𝐊`𝕰𝕰𝐓𝐄𝐑.

@RITAFORTUN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003441534496
TypeChannel
Username@RITAFORTUN
Description𝘹𝘰𝘹𝘰, 𝘨𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘱 𝘨𝘪𝘳𝘭. || 18+ ◯ 𝐎𝐖𝗡𝐄𝐑 : @SKEETERRRQWBOT ● 𝐌𝐘 𝐋𝕺𝐕𝐄 :
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 28 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/RITAFORTUN

Growth

2110 Aug 2026, 14:01 — 21 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 15:02 — 21 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:0111 Aug 2026, 15:02
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:0221no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:0121first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53145911662708352482019.2%
custom 53436997616586232502019.2%
custom 53978828786316370331716.3%
custom 53957030281100927411514.4%
custom 5395841055474072263109.62%
custom 546327636705335310698.65%
custom 533685726028080093287.69%
custom 519981337078559035732.88%
custom 540236222887365083221.92%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RITAFORTUN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 December 2025 to 31 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jan 2026, 12:37 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «𝕯𝐈𝐀𝗥𝐘 𝕽𝐈𝕿𝐀 𝐒𝐊`𝕰𝕰𝐓𝐄𝐑.»

24 Jan 2026, 11:32 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «frozen..? 𝕯𝐈𝐀𝗥𝐘 𝕽𝐈𝕿𝐀 𝐒𝐊`𝕰𝕰𝐓𝐄𝐑.»

8 Jan 2026, 09:10 UTC300 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⭐⭐📁 🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷 🦷 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷 . 👍 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🎤 😻😻💌 Прежде , чем заключить коннект, ознакомтесь с некоторыми условиями. 📁📁📁📁😻 Я единственная Рита Скитер в Вашем коннекте. И Вы в свою очередь - единственный персонаж в моём списке. 💀💀💀💀😻 Принимаю только фд *️⃣Гарри Поттер*️⃣. 💀💀💀💀😻 Активность друг у друга в дневниках — главное условие заключения ко

custom 53958410554740722636custom 54632763670533531066custom 53368572602808009325custom 53957030281100927413custom 51998133707855903572custom 53978828786316370332custom 54023622288736508322custom 53145911662708352481

1 Jan 2026, 12:29 UTC341 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

❗️ 🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 𝐆𝕺 𝐆𝐎𝕾𝕾𝐈𝐏🎤 💎 𝐁𝐎𝕺𝐒𝐓 🐶 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

custom 53978828786316370337custom 53145911662708352486custom 53436997616586232506custom 53957030281100927413custom 53958410554740722632custom 51998133707855903571custom 53368572602808009321custom 54632763670533531061

29 Dec 2025, 18:45 UTC525 views29 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🔢🌟🌟🌟🧛 🖤🖤😀😀🫙🫙 ☝️🅰️лондинка рассмеялась ➿ и указала на пару: ➿ пожилой мужчина и ➿ женщина, ➿ помоложе лет на двадцать. ⭐⭐⭐ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ — Милая, видишь ту пару? С первого взгляда самая обычная, верно? Только вот жена гуляет с другом той, с кем изменяет муж. Ну и смех! Брюнетка, слушавшая Риту, усмехнулась. — Ну и откуда же ты это знаешь? 🦷🦷китер улыбнулась, взяла бока

custom 53436997616586232509custom 53145911662708352488custom 53957030281100927417custom 53978828786316370332custom 53368572602808009321custom 53958410554740722631custom 54632763670533531061

29 Dec 2025, 13:40 UTC224 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🖤🖤🖤🖤 ➿➿➿➿➿➿ • 🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷 🤍🤍🦷🦷🤍🤍🤍.🤩 ⭐⭐➿⭐ ⭐⭐➿𝗦𝗁𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗅𝗅 𝗳𝖺𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻 ⭐⭐➿ ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐➿⭐⭐⭐𝗮𝗇𝗱 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻. 😀😀 😀😀 ⭐️ 😀😀😀😀 #𝗣𝖠𝕾𝖳 😀😀😀😀 #𝖯𝖱𝕰𝖲𝗘𝖭𝖳 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ❤️#𝘴𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘤𝘩 — #𝘱𝘰𝘷 — #𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘵 #𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘤 — #𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰 — #𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩⭐

custom 53978828786316370336custom 53145911662708352485custom 53436997616586232505custom 53957030281100927412custom 53368572602808009321custom 53958410554740722631custom 54632763670533531061

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @RITAFORTUN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 914,785 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕯𝐈𝐀𝗥𝐘 𝕽𝐈𝕿𝐀 𝐒𝐊`𝕰𝕰𝐓𝐄𝐑.” (@RITAFORTUN), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RITAFORTUN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.