وصية بليغة
👍4
Signed Mubarak Hasan

Channel
@RIIHIULMISK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
893subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001790719195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RIIHIULMISK |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RIIHIULMISK |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 893 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 895 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 895 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,714 |
| Reactions total | 81 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
81 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 73 | 90.1% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 7.41% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وصية بليغة
👍4
Signed Mubarak Hasan
✨اللهم لا تحرم أجسادنا من دخول الجنة يا رب.....
👍4
Signed Mubarak Hasan
اللهم حرم أجسادنا على النار..
👍8
Signed Mubarak Hasan
اللهم ارزقنا خير ما فيه يا رب......
👍7
Signed Mubarak Hasan
اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على نبيك وحبيبك وخليلك محمد وعلى آله وأصحابه أجمعين.
Signed Mubarak Hasan
اللهم ارزقنا حسن الخاتمة...
👍5🥰1
Signed Mubarak Hasan
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
Signed Mubarak Hasan
✨Baroota Hedduu Qaxxaamurte,Jabeenya Kee Laaffisuuf Ciminna Kee Dadhabsiisuuf Isaannan Ifaajan Baayyatanis Moo'annaa Jabaadhaan Bira Dabarte,Meeqa Kan Dukkana Wollaalaatiin Dhama'e Hayyuu Taasiftee Addunyaaf Ifaa Gootee Kennite,Meeqa Kan Kararraa Maqe Daandii Sirrii Itti Garsiiste. ✨Biyyi Kufte Siin Kaate,Kan Nagaha Dhabe Siin Tasgabbaa'e,Gandoonni Dukkanaa Hedduun Ifaa Keetiin Mullatte,Kan Adlii Dhabe Siin Argate,K…
👍5
Signed Mubarak Hasan
*الرمية التي أقرَّت أَعيُنَ المؤمنين ..!!* يقول "يعقوب بن جعفر": غزونا (عمورية) مع الخليفة" المعتصم" ، فما رأيت قوماً يحبون محمداً ﷺ كما رأيت المسلمين في تلك الغزوة!!. لما وصلنا أسوار (عمورية) ، أطل علينا عِلجٌ (أي محارب رومي) من أعلى السور قد وضع الصـليب في صدره وتكلم بلسان عربي فصيح وذكر أهل النبي ونسبه بسوء ، فامتلأت صدور المسلمين غيظاً وجعلو يسبونه ويرمونه بالنشاب فلا تصله السهام ، وهو يضحك ويشتم نبينا ويذكر أهل…
👍2
Signed Mubarak Hasan
✨اللهم ارحمنا يا رب واغفر لنا برحمتك يا أرحم الراحمين.
👍3
Signed Mubarak Hasan
قال الحافظ ابن رجب رحمہ اللہ تعالىٰ : المؤمن يأتيهِ عملهُ الصالح في قبرہ في أحسن صورة ، فيُبشّرہ بالسعادة من اللہ ، والكافر بعكس ذلك . 📕【 مجموع الرسائل (٤٣٣/٢) 】 https://t.me/RIIHIULMISK
👍1🥰1
Signed Mubarak Hasan
🌱MAAL YAADDA? ✨Diin Kun Dhuguma Tumsamee Eddoo Hundaa Jechi Rabbii Akka Lallabamuudhaa? ✨Ibaadaa Bareedduu Rabbiif Gootee Dhuguma Rabbiin Si Jaallachuudhaa? ✨Jaalalli Ilmiidhaa Si Seenee Lafee Fi Foon Kee Ilmii Qur'aanaa fi Hadiisaatiin Guutameeti Barsiisuudhaa? ✨Karaa Rabbii Keessatti Osoo Qabsoo Gosoota Gara Garaa Gootu Wereegamuudhaa? ✨Waan Garaa Kee Guutu Yeroo Takkaaf Qullaa Akka Hin Taane Addunyaa Kanarra…
👏2
Signed Mubarak Hasan
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RIIHIULMISK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐑𝐈𝐈𝐇𝐔𝐋 𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐊𝐈” (@RIIHIULMISK), 893 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RIIHIULMISK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.