2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 523–525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 04:01
524
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:13
524
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
12
Videos
2
Links
12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 03s
Average length
1m 32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
814 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
332
40.8%
👍
119
14.6%
🔥
91
11.2%
custom 5357482599474296564
67
8.23%
custom 5465129615376789984
44
5.41%
custom 5357584342954574062
41
5.04%
custom 5359403274489328078
33
4.05%
custom 5467864349903170820
28
3.44%
❤🔥
15
1.84%
👏
15
1.84%
🎄
7
0.86%
custom 5359491046440989898
5
0.614%
😁
5
0.614%
🤓
5
0.614%
custom 5465408625042273445
2
0.246%
✍
2
0.246%
🤝
2
0.246%
🥰
1
0.123%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 814reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @REJR_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 December 2024 to 17 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дорогие авторы!
От лица редакционной коллегии хочу поблагодарить вас за активное сотрудничество с нашим журналом, ваше неравнодушное отношение, обратную связь, которая помогает нам постоянно улучшать качество Российского Электронного Журнала Лучевой Диагностики.
🔤Уже более 15 лет мы издаем журнал, который на сегодняшний день стоит в рейтинге самых знаковых и признанных научных изданий России. На протяжении этого вре…
Дорогие друзья!🔔
В канун Нового года мы рады представить вам 4-й номер Российского
Электронного Журнала Лучевой Диагностики
(Том 15. Nº4. 2025)!
🍭Уходящий год был полон интеллектуального напряжения, моментов озарения и кропотливого труда. Страницы нашего журнала увидели свет благодаря вашим прорывным исследованиям, смелым гипотезам и экспериментам.
🍭Каждая опубликованная статья - это новый виток в спирали знаний, то…
🖤😊😊😊😊 - издание, где публикуются не только результаты передовых научных разработок, но и обучающие статьи, лекции, а также интересные случаи из практики специалистов лучевой диагностики, которые интересны нашим читателям. Среди них не только опытные специалисты, врачи, но и студенты, даже школьники! Будем и дальше стараться быть полезными для широкого круга подписчиков и авторов.
К 130-летию открытия рентгеновских лу…
🟢Когда невидимое стало видимым: в День рентгенолога специалисты рассказали о методах лучевой диагностики
8 ноября отмечается 130 лет с момента открытия Х-лучей. Именно так немецкий физик Вильгельм Конрад Рентген назвал свое открытие.
Несколько интересных фактов об этом революционном открытии:
🟢Известно точное время открытия рентгеновских лучей — 20:00.
🟢На первом рентгеновском снимке изображена кисть руки жены Рен…
Российский Электронный Журнал Лучевой Диагностики - партнер Волонтерского Центра Сеченовского Университета.
Интервью Главного редактора REJR ко Дню Рентгенолога.
Посмотреть
🔤Телеграм канал Волонтёрского Центра
🔤Дизайн канала REJR
#ВЦ_интервью: Всемирный День рентгенолога
🟢8 ноября – чудесный ноябрьский день, когда всё мировое медицинское сообщество отмечало Всемирный день рентгенолога, команда Волонтёрского Центра Сеченовского Университета из первых уст узнала о профессии, которая сделала видимым невидимое.
🩻На этот раз героем нашей постоянной рубрики стала Наталья Сергеевна Серова — академик РАН, профессор, доктор медицинских наук, главный…
Дорогие коллеги!
В этот важный для нашей специальности день, 8 ноября, мы рады представить вам 3-й номер Российского Электронного Журнала Лучевой Диагностики
Том 15. №3. 2025
Как всегда, мы старались подготовить выпуск, в котором каждый читатель сможет найти для себя интересные и полезные материалы – оригинальные статьи, научные обзоры и случаи из клинической практики.
Приятно отметить, что в этом номере представлен…
Уважаемые коллеги,
дорогие друзья!
Редакция Российского Электронного Журнала Лучевой Диагностики от всей души поздравляет вас со
🙄😉😊😁😉😝😛😐😁
😄😛☺️😁
😝😊😛😁😙😊😛😜😐😜😙☺️
👐 8 ноября – это знаковая дата для всех нас, день, когда 130 лет назад, в 1895 году, Вильгельм Конрад Рентген открыл лучи, названные его именем, и навсегда изменил мир медицины. Это не просто профессиональный праздник, а символ нашего единства, непрерывного с…
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дорогие коллеги!
Благодарим вас за обратную связь, мы внимательно относимся к вашим отзывам и пожеланиям.
Хотим узнать о вас больше и просим пройти небольшой опрос для понимания нашей целевой аудитории (отметьте один или несколько вариантов ответов, после которых не забудьте нажать кнопку «Проголосовать»).
Благодарим наших подписчиков и авторов за поддержку журнала.
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ для оптимизации нашей работы.
Какие виды статей для вас наиболее интересны? (Выберете один или несколько ответов)
Результаты оригинальных научных исследований62%
Интересные случаи из клинической практики77%
Обзоры литературы46%
История специальности и памятные даты17%
Клинические рекомендации49%
Другое (напишите в комментариях)2%
The shares total 253%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @REJR_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Благодарим наших подписчиков и авторов за поддержку журнала.
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ для оптимизации нашей работы.
Какие виды статей для вас наиболее интересны? (Выберете один или несколько ответов)
Результаты оригинальных научных исследований62%
Интересные случаи из клинической практики77%
Обзоры литературы46%
История специальности и памятные даты17%
Клинические рекомендации49%
Другое (напишите в комментариях)2%
The shares total 253%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вы принимаете участие в Форуме и Конгрессе "Радиология" ?
Ежегодно81%
Иногда5%
В этом году первый раз9%
Пока не решил5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 17 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REJR | Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology” (@REJR_channel), 524 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/REJR_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
