The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 7 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.

Channel
Airdrop sharks 🦈 3
@REAL_AIRDROP_PROVIDER
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
92subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001662840943 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @REAL_AIRDROP_PROVIDER |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 3 February 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/REAL_AIRDROP_PROVIDER |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 92 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 94 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 94 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
⚡️ *SPECIAL STELLAR XLM* Airdrop Announcement 📢 📢 📢 If you have a LOBSTR XLM Wallet or any other xlm wallet that has a min of 5xlm , DM me the Email 📧 address you used to register the Wallet... Offer is open 🔓 to 5 people only. $500 airdrop is waiting for you ✍️ ✍️ ✍️
https://t.me/LittleBillionaires_AirdropBot?start=r01664331111
https://airdrop.squadx.club/airdrop/556279
https://waitlist.aspenft.io?referral=o38z09r&refSource=copy Nft white list join now and receive aspenft
Airdrop sharks 🦈 3 pinned a photo
Shaping value and creating the future, others will never understand you now. You are only one 🚀 Spiderman Metaverse away from financial freedom. Click the link https://t.me/METASPIDERMAN_bot?start=1805717478 to receive the airdrop for free. Invite friends to win tens of millions of prizes, and you can also get tickets for the moon landing plan. Airdrop ending soon Hurry up now 💥💥💥💥
Video, posted without a caption
Legit airdrop i have received mine already check proof in the video
🏆 Pre-sale Live: https://terkehh.com • Time: 20 Feb 2022 – 22 Mar 2022 • Amount:42,000,000,000 • ICO Price: $0.0016 • CMC Price: $0.035 👉 Open website get contract: https://terkehh.com 💲 Your Balance: 10000 $Terk (~ $250) 🕛 Already withdrawn: 10000 $Terk 👨💼 1 Referral = 3000 $Terk 💰 1 $Terk = $0.025 BUSD 📑 Your address: 0xC56d79392D1F27918005f4788B1b55972655EEae 🔗 Referral Link: https://t.me/terkehh_bot?star…
💲 Your RGEN balance: 100 RGEN. You have invited 0 user(s). Referral link is: https://t.me/ParagenSecondRoundAirdropBot?start=1805717478 🔖 150,000 RGEN (~$15,000) will be shared amongst the top 100 referrers: 🔶 1st place : 40,000 RGEN 🔶 2nd place : 30,000 RGEN 🔶 3rd place : 20,000 RGEN 🔶 4th place : 7,500 RGEN 🔶 5th place …
https://t.me/bnbbep20_airdropbot?start=1805717478 Do this airdrop free 0.01 bnb withdraw today
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @REAL_AIRDROP_PROVIDER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 298,492 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@REAL_AIRDROP_PROVIDER named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop sharks 🦈 3” (@REAL_AIRDROP_PROVIDER), 92 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/REAL_AIRDROP_PROVIDER.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.