Channel
@RDsPlaybook
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001495361468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RDsPlaybook |
| Description | 免責聲明 : 本貼圖文純屬網上資源分享，以作為個人學習用途之用。如因相關言論或文章招致任何損失，概與本人無關；如有版權衝突問題請聯絡並作出跟進。 坐直早瞓做運動 飲水睇書鬥長命 Esse non vidare #信仰充值 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RDsPlaybook |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 121 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 121 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 272 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
🔍 链上侦探 | 做空1.02亿美元比特币的巨鲸遭部分清算，剩余仓位清算价约6.53万美元 BlockBeats 消息，8 月 8 日，据 TheDataNerd 监测，近日 40 倍杠杆大手笔做空 1.02 亿美元比特币的巨鲸遭遇部分清算，近一周亏损 146 万美元。目前补充保证金将做空仓位降至约 6000 万美元，开仓价 64,212.5 美元，清单价 65,310.2 美元。 原文链接 https://m.theblockbeats.info/flash/360558
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bu0xNDLNORU https://www.panewslab.com/zh-hant/articles/019fcb44-defd-7207-9793-32b747af75eb Ray Dalio談泡沫、現金與AI：熊市可能再跌六成，但沒人能精準擇時 整理 & 編譯：深潮TechFlow 2026/08/04 下午03:31 #信仰充值 #Ray_Dalio
DB: *US JULY NONFARM PAYROLLS FALL -23K M/M; EST. +80K *US JULY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE 4.1%; EST. 4.2% *US JULY AVERAGE HOURLY EARNINGS RISE 0.1% M/M; EST. +0.3% *US JULY AVERAGE HOURLY EARNINGS RISE 3.2% Y/Y; EST. +3.5% DB: *美国7月非农就业人数环比减少2.3万人；预期增加8万人 *美国7月失业率4.1%；预期4.2% *美国7月平均时薪环比增长0.1%；预期增长0.3% *美国7月平均时薪同比增长3.2%；预期增长3.5% ———————————— 2026-08-07 20:30:14
DDOG -19% (收市價) NET +16% (盤後) FROG +16% (盤後) AKAM +12% (盤後) TEAM +32% (盤後) 暫時睇到有部分公司管理層實際睇到既野同市場之前以為既野有好大分別，有mis-pricing的嫌疑，值得深入研究 簡單一句總結係，今季可能開始出現的 hidden theme，唔係就咁一句「AI software」咁簡單，而係「AI令 machine-generated work / software / traffic 爆炸，令負責管理、觀察、保護、傳輸及協調呢啲 machine activity 的平台出現需求加速」
Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do. - J.P. Morgan #Quote
唔知唔係少睇新文章，點都好似同之前有啲唔同咁
見到好多人將上一篇理解成： 「半導體已經玩完，要轉炒AI應用/安全/管理。」 其實完全唔係我寫呢篇野既意思。 我真正想講嘅係： 長線資金似乎由Build AI，慢慢轉去 Use AI / Secure AI / Manage AI / Monetise AI，而市場仲未有太多人討論，大家仲係日日係度講AI基建股。呢個觀察如果係真，可能仲會有半年到一年左右玩，但而家仲未可以確定（因為呢種升法可以單純因為呢d股之前一年跌得太多，而家只係暫時性既rotation，業績趨勢一唔對路d錢就會走），所以仲要觀察基本因素同埋對應市場態度既變化。 一陣間既DDOG、NET 業績，因為佢地之前已經升得多，而家個價代表緊市場對佢地既 expectations 極之高，除非Forward guidance有超意外驚喜，否則都係跌既機會比較多。但我講既觀察，並唔係觀察業績後單日升定跌，而係要睇下會唔會：1. 眾多公司都出現基本因素既根本性改變，管理層…
https://www.books.com.tw/products/0011057581 花錢的藝術：打造富足人生的金錢心理學 《致富心態》作者 Morgan Housel 新書 #Books #相信閱讀 #信仰充值
係過去一個多月，睇到好多人講AI 牛市已死：對沖基金撤離 AI 股，韓國個個輸身家，仲邊有得玩。 但我睇到既 picture，就好似唔係咁。的確，如果你只係識睇個個都講既 MU、LRCX、BE、NBIS、CRWV 呢堆，你一定會覺得：AI trade 已經爆咗。 但如果你同一時間去睇 NET、SNOW、ESTC、NTNX、DDOG，你會見到完全另一個世界。 但唔知點解，好似冇乜傳媒/財演有特別講呢d股票，我暫時認為呢次其實係一次非常猛烈既AI股自己內部既Sub-sector Rotation。 由 6 月 25 日計，QQQ 期間 peak-to-trough 最大 drawdown 大約 10%，SOXX 更加接近 27%。上一輪最 crowded 既 high beta AI names，全部被大幅拋售。但有另一批 AI 股，幾乎係完全冇參與過呢次跌市，有好多其實正正就係6月25日左右見最近低位然後展開升浪。例如：SN…
Photo, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/f8FrvkJt4nk BlackRock Larry Fink
我覺得最近個市易左, 耐性市
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RDsPlaybook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Playbook ©️ C for Chocolate” (@RDsPlaybook), 121 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RDsPlaybook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.