So, after a long silence, we decided to finally break it and share the latest news: 1️⃣ Our holders community, although still small, but very active. The holder-chat regularly hosts reviews and discussions of various projects, including NFT, we share our trades there, arrange votes on various important decisions, have fun with checks and mini-contests. 😁 And, of course, we help inexperienced guys figure out some poi…

Channel
Realm of Digital Lucre
@RDLfund
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002093489240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RDLfund |
| Description | Accessible and transparent fund on the NFT-collection format on TON. You buy our NFT, we trade this money and pay a percentage of this trading as long as you have the NFT. Simple and profitable as possible. CEO — @Yablochkinn |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 2 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RDLfund |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 7 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 2 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 12
- Links
- 13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2024 to 18 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Yesterday's sale went much better than we expected, considering all the circumstances before it started. 😨 For which we thank, first of all, our community. RDL appreciates each of you! 🖤 Today we will begin the active phase of our work. You may notice how the collected money moves to the stock exchanges (remember that one of us is a crypto-trader? 😉 ), other wallets, are invested in interesting projects of the TON e…
⚡️💸 Sale begins 💸 ⚡️ And it`s started! We are glad to welcome everyone who has waited, we declare the first sale of the NFT collection Realm of Digital Lucre open! 💥💥💥 🔩 You need to do the following: Here is the wallet: UQBCJciIhZLUUxDOEjKrJAIJeok6Q6TYufo8c2uOw-7rbfJ6 You need to send a transaction to it with a comment on how much NFT you want and what kind of rarity. For example: 5 common 3 legend 1 rare And the …
⚡️ Sale today at 20:00! ⚡️ It seems that the blockchain has calmed down, and we are already impatient (and you, judging by the comments, too😁), so we will try today. 🕒 20:00 by Moscow time. Get ready, read the previous post, if you forgot something. The rest of the details will be closer in time. And special thanks to everyone who understood and supported yesterday's delay of the sale, you are the best. 🔥
Sale is temporarily cancelled 😢 It turns out that we lied to you in the previous post and we deeply apologize for it. 😶 The TON network is now half-dead due to today's listing of notcoin, conducting a sale in its current state is not an option. We want everything to go as smoothly as possible and, frankly, we thought that the network problems would not start so early. But were wrong. 🟢 We want to reschedule the sa…
♾ Prepare for the sale tomorrow! Sale-bot (reason of why we delayed the start of sales so much) has been tested, we are ready both mentally and physically, so everything will definitely happens tomorow! 💥 We remind you about the prices: 💎 Common — 5 TON, there will be 100 of them on the first sale 💎 Uncommon — 13 TON, there will be 50 of them in total on the first sale 💎 Rare — 21 TON, there will be 50 of them on t…
♾ Prices and all else We are sincerely pleased that the comments are so often interested in prices of our NFT. 🖤 We are responding: 💎 Common — 5 TON, there will be 100 of them on the first sale 💎 Uncommon — 13 TON, there will be 50 of them in total on the first sale 💎 Rare: — 21 TON, there will be 50 of them on the first sale 💎 Epic: — 33 TON, there will be 20 of them on the first sale 💎 Legendary — 51 TONS, there …
🟢 Mint is completed 🟢 So, this day has finally come. All our crypto-cards are minted, which means that tomorrow we will announce the terms and the start date of sale. 💥 In about a day at minting of 1000 NFT, 3 scam tokens (the ones with the QR-code) came to the collection wallet and about 70 TON were spent to the mint (the decrease of transaction fees, promised by TF was not noticed🤔). The mint went fine, there we…
🎧 Mint has started! 🎧 As we promised, mint started today, just a minute ago. 💥 Approximately tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, we will be fully ready for the start of the first sale. Thanks to everyone who supported us, even though we started only 10 days ago.😁 And thanks in advance to everyone who will participate in the upcoming sale and stay with us for a long time. RDL is breaking into the market! 🚀
When are the sale finally there? 😡 ♾ So, after a short break yesterday, we returned with the news. All NFT are rendered, metadata is registered, everything works fine. The mint will start tomorrow, at last the day after tomorrow, we will manage just for the holidays. 😉 🔩 We will announce the sale mechanic, the exact date of its start and the prices for the cards after the mint, it's not long to wait. 🟢In the meant…
👁 Who`s are behind this project? 👁 RDL has only 2 founders. Many people already know them, but for the new ones: @Yablochkinn — the face of the project that you will see most often in the comments. 😁 Specialist in token trading and the TON blockchain in general. In crypto for 5 years, 3 of which he spent on TON. He have his own blog, where he shares the expert opinios about what is happening in the ecosystem. 💎 @H…
🔩 As promised yesterday, we will tell you more about the collection 🔩 Supply: there will be only 1000 NFT. Such a small supply is needed, first of all, in order to assemble a small, strong community with which will be easy to interact. And this way will be easier for us to distribute dividends among you and everyone will have a good amounts, rather than 10k NFT per cent of income for each. 😁 We will think about furt…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @RDLfund. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 527,027 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@RDLfund named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Realm of Digital Lucre” (@RDLfund), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RDLfund.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.