а вообще ждем всех:)
custom 53506162309631978466custom 52018927405472247904custom 52021109721305013544

Channel
@RAVENSI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
74subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001944882161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RAVENSI |
| Description | дата открытия: 11.02.22 |
| Created | 16 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RAVENSI |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 74 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 74 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 16 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
180 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350616230963197846 | 64 | 35.6% | |
| custom 5201892740547224790 | 42 | 23.3% | |
| custom 5202110972130501354 | 37 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5202123637989057558 | 33 | 18.3% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.67% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.556% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2023 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
а вообще ждем всех:)
custom 53506162309631978466custom 52018927405472247904custom 52021109721305013544
мы слушаем и не осуждаем💅
custom 53506162309631978467custom 52021236379890575586custom 52018927405472247905custom 52021109721305013544
Signed maledictio rvs
т9 решил, что мы церковные мартышки, но православного в нас нет💀
custom 52018927405472247907custom 52021236379890575583custom 53506162309631978463
Signed maledictio rvs
мы только с виду такие серьёзные дядьки, на самом деле мы цирковые мартышки☺️
custom 53506162309631978469custom 52021236379890575586custom 52018927405472247905custom 52021109721305013542
Signed maledictio rvs
ну я считаю равноценно 😊
custom 53506162309631978466custom 52021236379890575585custom 52021109721305013544custom 52018927405472247903
Signed Ramil' Kamsky
рады сообщить, что набор открыт и мы ждем вас в нашем чате. для вступления писать @hwiilo
custom 52018927405472247902custom 52021236379890575582custom 53506162309631978462
Signed maledictio rvs
мои таланты 👍
custom 53506162309631978469custom 52021109721305013548custom 52018927405472247907custom 52021236379890575584
Signed Ramil' Kamsky
RAVENS pinned «Набор нью закрыт. Если вы хотите попасть в чат, то оставляйте свои юзы под этим постом и как только набор откроется с вамм свяжутся.»
Всем воронятам привет, хорошего вам дня,кушайте хорошо и знайте ,что вы прекрасны🎀 ★админ по нью Хан
custom 53506162309631978466custom 52018927405472247905custom 52021109721305013544
Signed sɴɪᴘᴇʀ
Набор нью закрыт. Если вы хотите попасть в чат, то оставляйте свои юзы под этим постом и как только набор откроется с вамм свяжутся.
custom 53506162309631978468custom 52021236379890575586custom 52021109721305013545
Signed maledictio Lr
вороны вновь открывают свои двери) желающие попасть в чат пишите @hwiilo
custom 53506162309631978464custom 52021109721305013542custom 52021236379890575581
Signed maledictio Lr
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 OWNER: HWI CO-OWNER: RAMIL'
Signed maledictio Lr
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @RAVENSI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 553,788 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RAVENSI named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAVENS” (@RAVENSI), 74 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RAVENSI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.