Channel
RANGER VPN
@RANGERVPNir
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,487subscribers
-834 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002136212043 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RANGERVPNir |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RANGERVPNir |
Previous handles
@RANGERVPNir was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 59,487 | -338 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 59,825 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 59,825 | -57 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 59,882 | -292 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 60,174 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:19 | 60,174 | -147 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 60,321 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 13 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tunesgraphy · 139,577
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@dopmaine10k · 218,123
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
@deldarofficial · 130,067
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@text_rph3 · 131,228
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
@clipdidani5 · 146,354
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
@aryanerg · 353,924
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
@fazamusic_tel · 142,306
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@musicpiin · 225,734
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@imgfli · 246,013
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RANGER VPN” (@RANGERVPNir), 59,487 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RANGERVPNir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.