🔵آژانس بینالمللی انرژی اتمی: از وضعیت تأسیسات و مواد هستهای ایران اطلاعی نداریم 💢آژانس بینالمللی انرژی اتمی در اظهاراتی که رویترز منتشر کرده، ادعا کرد: 🔸«هیچ اطلاعاتی از ایران درباره وضعیت تأسیسات و مواد هستهای این کشور دریافت نکردهایم.» 🔸«بهجز نیروگاه برق بوشهر، امکان دسترسی به هیچیک از تأسیسات هستهای ایران برای ما فراهم نشده است.» 🔸«نگرانیهای ما به دلیل اجازه ندادن ایران برای دسترسی به اطلاعات طراحی یا…

Channel
اخبار دلی بازارها
@miixdeli
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,070subscribers
-7,496 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002089483740 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miixdeli |
| Description | اخبار دلی بازارها خبرهای مهم، قبل از همه! از اقتصاد تا بازارهای مالی، سرعت در اطلاعرسانی، دقت در انتشار همراه ما، همیشه بهروز باش♥️ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miixdeli |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 00:20 | 63,070 | -142 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 00:07 | 63,212 | -144 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:44 | 63,356 | -115 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:16 | 63,471 | -92 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 63,563 | -104 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:07 | 63,667 | -69 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 63,736 | -88 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 63,824 | -78 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:58 | 63,902 | -94 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:59 | 63,996 | -104 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 64,100 | -157 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 64,257 | -138 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 64,395 | -98 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 64,493 | -55 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:41 | 64,548 | -45 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:44 | 64,593 | -60 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:51 | 64,653 | -45 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 64,698 | -55 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:44 | 64,753 | -85 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 64,838 | first reading |
Engagement
244 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.122%
- avg views ÷ 63,070 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 76.8
- 223 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.84%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 223
- of 244 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 223 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 244 (29 December 2025 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,120 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 91
- Videos
- 25
- Links
- 205
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 24m 10s
- Average length
- 58s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
361 reactions across 34 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 163 | 45.2% | |
| ❤ | 118 | 32.7% | |
| 💔 | 34 | 9.42% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 5.82% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.66% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.39% | |
| 😐 | 5 | 1.39% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.831% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.554% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.554% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.277% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.277% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 244 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 223 posts held from the last 30 days (1.79%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📌 حذف کالابرگ خانوارها غیرقانونی است 🔹متفکرآزاد عضو هیئت رئیسه مجلس در نامه ای رسمی خطاب به وزیر تعاون، حذف تعدادی از خانوارها از طرح کالابرگ الکترونیکی را فاقد مجوز قانونی دانست و خواستار توقف فوری این رویه شد. خانه ملت @AKHBAR BAZARHA
تسنیم تصاویر ماهوارهای از رادار آمریکایی در بحرین که سپاه آن را منهدم کرد، منتشر کرده است @AKHBAR BAZARHA
🔹 ادعای ترامپ درباره ایران: 🔹 تمرکز و رویکرد من بر توافقکردن است؛ تمام زندگی من با معاملات و توافقهای بزرگ گره خورده 🔹 عربستان از من خواسته است که لطفاً فعلاً اوضاع را برای مدتی به همین شکل حفظ کنم؛ قطر، کویت، امارات و بحرین هم همینطور 🔹آنها در «کوه کلنگ» فعالیت چندانی نداشتهاند اما اگر فعالیتی داشته باشند، آنجا را هم بمباران خواهیم کرد / انتخاب @AKHBAR BAZARHA
ریزش 7 درصدی بیتکوین! بیتکوین 68500 دلار @AKHBAR BAZARHA
#تکمیلی با تأیید خبرگزاریهای داخلی، امشب پایگاه سپاه توی سیریک در استان هرمزگان، به طور کامل بمبارون شد. @AKHBAR BAZARHA
♨️ در کمتر از ۱ ساعت سنتکام پاسخ موشک های سپاه به سمت ناوش رو با حمله به لانچرهای موشکی سپاه در سیریک هرمزگان داد @AKHBAR BAZARHA
گزارشهای تاییدنشدهای مبنی بر پرتاب موشک از منطقه سربندر، خوزستان منتشر شده است. @AKHBAR BAZARHA
‼️🇮🇱 شبکه ۱۵ عبری: اسرائیل درباره تداوم توسعه زرادخانه موشکهای بالستیک و تلاش جمهوری اسلامی برای احیای برنامه هستهای خود هشدار داده و تأکید کرده است که در صورت لزوم، چه با حمایت آمریکا و چه بدون آن، برای مقابله نظامی با جمهوری اسلامی اقدام خواهد کرد. @AKHBAR BAZARHA
⭕️ فوری/ تایید حمله آمریکا به سیریک هرمزگان 🔸به گزارش ایرنا، منابع رسمی اعلام کردند دقایقی قبل سیریک در استان هرمزگان مورد اصابت آمریکا قرار گرفت. 🔸بر اساس این گزارش اصابت صورت گرفته ماهیت نظامی دارد. @AKHBAR BAZARHA
🇺🇸🇮🇷 کانال ۱۴ اسرائیل: ایران مذاکرات هستهای را رد کرد 🟢ایران طی ۲۴ ساعت اخیر به قطر اطلاع داده که حاضر به مذاکره هستهای نیست. قطر این پیام را به آمریکا منتقل کرد و ترامپ نوشت: نیازی به توافق با ایران نیست. @AKHBAR BAZARHA
فوووووری ترامپ در مورد توافق دبه کرده با همین مسخره بازی هاش تونسته نفت رو پایین ۱۰۰دلار برسونه @akbar bazareha
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 244 posts we hold for @miixdeli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@miixdeli edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 5 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ترجیح میدی کدوم باشی؟
- عاشق یکی باشی ولی اون اصلا تو رو نخواد😔7%
- یکی عاشقت باشه ولی تو اصلا اونو نخوای🥲28%
- خار هرچی عشقه رو گاییدم🫤😂83%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iman_hajinezhad · 180,263#1
@dark_videv · 238,737#2
@RmxTor · 175,803#3
@remix_senatoor · 1,261#4
@RiMixeYou · 1,005,245#5
@dj_dark_remix · 156,398#6
@ReMiXeRapY · 2,322,895#7
@Daarkk_Remix · 33,387#8
@mhiedit · 119,467#9
@kinghr_beat · 551 (as read 20 August 2026)#10
@moowdmixm · 112,147#11
@RoseRemixe · 179,308#12
@sayehbakhtak1 · 113,284#13
@urap_ufarsi · 55,267#14
@salib_remix · 90,599#15
@musicpiin · 230,597#16
@imgfli · 302,144#17
@RiMixaM · 454,949#18
@nevaremix · 4,271#19
@iamir_yal · 94,586#20
@NAJI_REMIX · 14,714#21
@Remix_Mahdyar · 46,451#22
@amir_sowlo1 · 231,758#23
@SAEIDREMIX · 71,375#24
@Arthur_remix · 26,236#25
@rapvidev · 108,890#26
@AliMix0 · 13,042#27
@remixosta · 10,725#28
@Dream_rap · 58,901#29
@bet303bet404 · 38,832#30
@Mahdyarofficial · 84,212#31
@ZedRemix · 19,416#32
@aryanerg · 436,082#33
@Goldsscalp · 72,096#34
@text_rph3 · 119,368#35
@CafeSas · 27,140#36
@dj_taha1 · 56,442#37
@Alone_remix1 · 45,787#38
@Ahaang_lati · 166,703#39
@moOdeditr · 9,783#40
@dancebet_sait · 43,909#41
@nayabrapi · 29,738#42
@icRemix · 76,878#43
@me_t_a_f · 10,550#44
@pxremix1 · 3,194#45
@cli_azox · 2,440#46
@javanan_mamlekat · 31,898#47
@HK_Remix · 33,316#48
@Dotabet_vip · 11,167 (as read 20 August 2026)#49
@djsajjad1 · 89,534#50
@RaviRemix · 4,329#51
@sadremix · 66,621#52
@me_qen · 47,370#53
@zerroremix · 23,990#54
@amfedit · 90,449#55
@Texturk · 28,047#56
@emi6x · 23,442#57
@arasedit · 18,449#58
@Muokaft · 13,809#59
@sammetremix · 106,438#60
@CafeTextTurk · 17,428#61
@BB30REMIX · 59,612#62
@aisobeatz · 141,885#63
@DJKINGABAS · 202,758#64
@rapfarsipsw · 99,530#65
@Nicoutineman · 37,464#66
@muziicterapy · 30,433#67
@PLAYVIBES · 127,286#68
@rap_offlcialll · 34,466#69
@fati_wmx · 121,657#70
@edit_tanafor · 28,579#71
@DJALIPADASHI · 224,647#72
@deej_nobix · 92,401#73
@jimi_beatz1 · 53,186#74
@remixdepH · 278,915#75
@nimiekip · 24,108 (as read 20 August 2026)#76
@RemixRaseb · 13,126#77
@text_officail · 97,897#78
@zakiwmusic · 6#79
@beat_remix1 · 2,257#80
@cloudmoonww · 1,478#81
@modepvideo1 · 99,628#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Goldsscalp · 72,096
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
@moowdmixm · 112,147
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@arasedit · 18,449
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 October 2026
@dancebet_sait · 43,909
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
@iman_hajinezhad · 180,263
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@muziicterapy · 30,433
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
@CafeSas · 27,140
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
@rapfarsipsw · 99,530
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
@newremiix · 26,689
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
@imgfli · 302,144
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@Texturk · 28,047
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
@PLAYVIBES · 127,286
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@Ahaang_lati · 166,703
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@onismix · 23,046
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
@edit_tanafor · 28,579
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
@bet303bet404 · 38,832
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
@MUSIC_DOZHAM · 44,716
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
@qofIimu · 28,342
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
@rapvidev · 108,890
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@Nicoutineman · 37,464
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@clipdidani5 · 141,084
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
@DEEJMOMIX · 62,288
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
@remixmoon · 138,234
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
@text_rph3 · 119,368
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 75 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار دلی بازارها” (@miixdeli), 63,070 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miixdeli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.