Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ❯❯̸⃟ 𝐑̷𝐎̷𝐒̷𝐄̷𝐒̷ 𝐎̷𝐅̷ 𝐋̷𝐎̷𝐕̷𝐄̷̷̚.🔒

Channel

❯❯̸⃟ 𝐑̷𝐎̷𝐒̷𝐄̷𝐒̷ 𝐎̷𝐅̷ 𝐋̷𝐎̷𝐕̷𝐄̷̷̚.🔒

@R0S3SofL0V7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

251subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004431684305
TypeChannel
Username@R0S3SofL0V7
Created28 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/R0S3SofL0V7

Growth

251252251.513 Aug 2026, 21:31 — 252 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 03:17 — 251 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 21:3115 Aug 2026, 03:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 251–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:17251-1
13 Aug 2026, 21:31252first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.7%
avg views ÷ 251 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.1
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held13 (28 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total737
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52765270787395660452428.6%
custom 51727384424124262821821.4%
custom 50036039660307758011011.9%
custom 517253306566626600178.33%
custom 494052906416419742067.14%
custom 494307019444977799355.95%
custom 517044434576081013744.76%
custom 517270830462691083444.76%
custom 536156140106626643633.57%
custom 536411525733996542233.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @R0S3SofL0V7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

даун

custom 49405290641641974201

Signed БЕSАЙОV БYDDА يهرب

2 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC90 viewsread 13 August 2026

кто тебе админку дал

Signed бродяга.

2 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC92 viewsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed БЕSАЙОV БYDDА يهرب

2 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC96 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ура бтс

custom 49405290641641974201custom 51727083046269108341

Signed БЕSАЙОV БYDDА يهرب

2 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «❯❯̸⃟ 𝐑̷𝐎̷𝐒̷𝐄̷𝐒̷ 𝐎̷𝐅̷ 𝐋̷𝐎̷𝐕̷𝐄̷̷̚.🔒»

2 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC98 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Вот и подошла к завершению история конференции «Roses of Love», эти насыщенные дни, наполненные новыми идеями, глубокими или глупыми разговорами, и ценными знакомствами. От имени всей администрации мы хотим выразить искреннюю благодарность каждому из вас, кто был с нами. Ваше активное участие, энтузиазм, и открытость к обмену опытом сделали эту конференцию по-настоящему успешной и незабываемой. Мы надеемся, что вам

custom 52765270787395660455custom 51727083046269108343custom 49405290641641974202

Signed бродяга.

30 Jun 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,080 views33 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🩸 𝐎𝟏. Подпишитесь на канал. 𝐎𝟐. Ознакомьтесь с правилами и поставьте инициал. 𝐎𝟑. Подайте заявку на вступление. Заявки рассматриваются выборочно! Пустые профили и нотвирт аккаунты будут отклонены!

custom 517273844241242628211custom 51725330656662660017custom 52765270787395660456custom 51704443457608101374custom 53641152573399654223custom 49430701944497779932

29 Jun 2026, 20:20 UTC689 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 49405290641641974202

29 Jun 2026, 20:20 UTC750 views36 reactions16 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Roses of love — это место, где даже в тени можно найти красоту. Здесь холодный шёпот косы становится мелодией для самых честных разговоров, а лепестки роз распускаются на фоне пустоты. Той самой, ради которой мы остались после захода солнца, чтобы собрать воспоминания и подарить им вторую жизнь. 𝑊𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑎𝑦 🌹 𝐏Ä𝐓Ē𝐍𝐓 𝑂𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑠 🌟 Û𝐍𝐈Ø𝐍𝐒 𝑂𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑠 𝐂𝐇Ã𝐓 𝐑Ü𝐋𝐄𝐒 𝑟𝑢𝑠ℎ 𝑖𝑛 𝐀𝐃𝐌Ï𝐍𝐒 𝐑𝐔𝐋Ē𝐒 🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝑂ℎ, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝐼 𝐀𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐒 𝑏𝑢𝑡

custom 527652707873956604513custom 500360396603077580110custom 51727384424124262827custom 49430701944497779933custom 53615614010662664363

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @R0S3SofL0V7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 700,511 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❯❯̸⃟ 𝐑̷𝐎̷𝐒̷𝐄̷𝐒̷ 𝐎̷𝐅̷ 𝐋̷𝐎̷𝐕̷𝐄̷̷̚.🔒” (@R0S3SofL0V7), 251 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/R0S3SofL0V7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.