Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[Ушла за руку с Измаэль. Архив.] ⚰ 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐠 | #𝐌𝐲 𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥... 🌅

@Queequeg_LimComNet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003422848924
TypeChannel
Username@Queequeg_LimComNet
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 1 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Queequeg_LimComNet

Growth

2211 Aug 2026, 20:46 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:00 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 20:4611 Aug 2026, 21:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:0022no change
11 Aug 2026, 20:4622first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Videos
5
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

110 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54427680743086101812623.6%
custom 54720740792782162142220.0%
custom 53215141682206822621513.6%
😢1513.6%
custom 53191152013525718161311.8%
custom 5321547024720499297109.09%
custom 532128263941864722643.64%
custom 532108976961726443632.73%
custom 543388606046563344410.909%
👀10.909%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2026, 19:39 UTC75 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А ведь же Рикардо и Квиг не смогли помириться.

😢4

5 Apr 2026, 19:22 UTC76 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

простите пожалуйста, мне очень грустно уходить и т.д, но в личной жизни проблемы, может быть вернусь, а может быть и нет. мне канал жалко удалять и все эти старания. еще раз, всем спасибо. все плохо у меня.. все осень плохо.. возможно, что-то сделаю с этим каналом.

😢11

5 Apr 2026, 19:19 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «[Ушла за руку с Измаэль. Архив.] ⚰ 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐠 | #𝐌𝐲 𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥... 🌅»

20 Mar 2026, 15:12 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «[Rest.] ⚰ 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐠 | #𝐌𝐲 𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥... 🌅»

20 Mar 2026, 15:12 UTC91 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @LimbusComNet

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😻😻😻 ➖ашей Квикег понадобился небольшой отдых ! Просьба не беспокоить еë . . ( 20.03 — 03.04 ) ♡゙ ➖➖😻➖#rest➖😻➖

15 Mar 2026, 18:50 UTC107 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔠𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍 №8️⃣🔠 ⠀⠀⠀ ──────────── 🙂дравствуйте, интересный однако вопрос, но я к сожалению.. Не читала толком книги, ну или же изредка их как-то читала. Чтение это не мой конек... Ну могу что-то почитать, а могу и нет естественно. Все же, чтение не так привлекает меня как другие дела, которые люблю делать. ──────────── ⠀⠀ . . . ⚰️

custom 54427680743086101815custom 54720740792782162143custom 53191152013525718162

15 Mar 2026, 16:42 UTC88 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔠𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍 №8️⃣3️⃣ ⠀⠀⠀ ──────────── 🙂дравствуйте, можете так ко мне не обращаться? Мне лучше просто Квиквег, никак иначе. И порода собак любимая.. Любите мне такие однотипные вопросы задавать, да? Люблю всей душой Хаски.. Не раз об этом писала на самом деле. Хотела бы ее, но у меня толком таково нету возможностей каких либо, да и желания нету. Собак люблю, но беспонятия, почему не могу завести до сих пор, я бы так давн

custom 53191152013525718163custom 54720740792782162143custom 53210897696172644362

15 Mar 2026, 16:28 UTC66 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔠𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍 №8️⃣1️⃣ ⠀⠀⠀ ──────────── 🙂ечера. Состояние у меня не из лучших сейчас, но я стараюсь оставаться все так же в том, чем надо.. Рада, что мы с Измаэль завели отношения.. И я думала, что будет все иначе и меня моя подруга же начнет ненавидеть.. В итоге мы стали чем-то большим. И меня это радует крайне. Возможно тут некоторые рады к этому? Так ведь? Я тоже рада на самом деле.. Не думала, что так получится у меня

custom 54720740792782162144custom 53191152013525718163custom 54427680743086101812

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Queequeg_LimComNet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,280,388 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[Ушла за руку с Измаэль. Архив.] ⚰ 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐠 | #𝐌𝐲 𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥... 🌅” (@Queequeg_LimComNet), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Queequeg_LimComNet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.