Channel
@Qudrat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
175subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001687145386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Qudrat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Qudrat |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 175 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 173 | -19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 192 | +18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 174 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 174 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Talqinlarning obyektivligi 2/2 Lekin bu yerda yana bir muammo bor. Inson faqat talqin qilmaydi, u o'z talqinini haqiqat deb ham qabul qiladi. Biz deyarli hech qachon o'zimizga: "Bu mening talqinim", demaymiz. Aksincha: "Haqiqat shunday", deymiz. Aslida esa ongimiz juda kam hollarda obyektiv ishlaydi. U dalillarni yig'ishdan ko'ra, oldindan ishongan narsamizni tasdiqlaydigan dalillarni izlashni yaxshi ko'radi. Agar …
Hodisa - Talqin - Javob Bu 3 ta narsani koʻp holatlarga tadbiq qilsa boʻladi. Qulayroq misol bilan tushuntirishga harakat qilaman. 1/2 Internet g'alati joy. Bir kuni 50 ming dollarini qimorda yutqazib, hayotiga nuqta qo'ygan odam haqidagi xabarni o'qiysan. Oradan ko'p o'tmay esa 300 ming dollar qarzga botgan, hamma narsasidan ayrilgan, lekin bir necha yildan keyin yana oyoqqa turib, biznesini tiklagan boshqa bir i…
"Ben sana bu çiçekleri mezarlıktan çaldım." "Men senga bu gullarni qabristondan uzib keldim." Juda kuchli metafora. Go‘zallik ham ba'zan og‘riq va yo‘qotish ichidan tug‘iladi. Qoʻshiq mazmuni qabriston gullaridek chiroyli va chuqur ekan. Gazapizm
Insonning eng katta illyuziyalaridan biri - hayotni, yoki istalgan bir narsani tushunganiga ishonish. Bir nechta kitob. Bir nechta nazariya. Biroz tajriba. Shu kifoya. Odam hayotning algoritmini topgandek boshqalarga uni tushuntira boshlaydi. Algoritm qisman bordirkuya. Hamma narsada qonuniyatlar bordir. Ammo xaosning o'rni kattaroq. Hayotni bir necha formulaga, psixologik modelga yoki falsafiy qarashga sig'diris…
Bu fikrlarni hissiyot bilan emas, ta'lim sohasidagi uzoq kuzatishlarim va tajribam asosida yozyapman. Hozircha quyidagi xulosalarga kelganman: - Ta'lim bozorida narxlarda spekulyatsiya bor. Ta'limga bevosita aloqasi bo'lmagan omillar ham mahsulot qiymati sifatida sotilyapti. - Konvertda oylik beradigan ta'lim muassasasi qadriyatlar haqida gapirishdan oldin o'ziga qarashi kerak. Gap faqat soliqqa borib taqalmaydi. …
#5/44 HAMMADAN AJRALIB QOLASIZ | Eshitishni o'rgansangiz
Texnologiya faqat ishni tezlashtirish uchun emas, balki butun jarayonni tartibga solish uchun ham xizmat qilishi kerak. Shu gʻoya bilan bir muddat oldin Negiz Testolog platformasini ishga tushirgandik. Uning vazifasi taʼlim muassasalarida offline imtihonlarni roʻyxatdan oʻtkazishdan boshlab natijalarni eʼlon qilishgacha boʻlgan jarayonni avtomatlashtirish edi. testolog.negiz.uz Endi esa shu yondashuvni tibbiyot soh…
https://youtu.be/VgBa_2VtdJU?si=IYYRTmRrb5oiRuq6
#4/44 Siz haqingizdagi eng katta sir
#3/44 | Ta'limning mohiyati nima?
#2/44 | Qizil ip: Nega ba'zi odamlar boshqalar ko'rmaydigan bog'liqliklarni ko'radi?
#1/44 | Perfeksionizm sizni mukammal emas, harakatsiz qiladi
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Qudrat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Qudrat” (@Qudrat), 175 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Qudrat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.