Spike Both ways but Our Direction Win⚜️ All TP Achieved ! +512pips locked in! secure your profits, set breakeven, and let the rest run risk-free 💎
❤7👍2🥰2💋1🤩1

Channel
@QuartzAcademyIntl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,884subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001780474473 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QuartzAcademyIntl |
| Description | Welcome to Quartz Academy 📊 Your cozy guide to trading with patience, purpose & peace. Learn smarter, trade calmer, shine brighter ✨ 📲 @QuartzAssistant |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QuartzAcademyIntl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 19,884 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 19,903 | -25 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 19,928 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (10 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,208 |
| Reactions total | 426 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
426 reactions across 49 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 202 | 47.4% | |
| 🔥 | 113 | 26.5% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 5.16% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 4.46% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 4.23% | |
| 😎 | 18 | 4.23% | |
| 🤗 | 12 | 2.82% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.704% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.469% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.469% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.469% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.235% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.235% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.235% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 426reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Spike Both ways but Our Direction Win⚜️ All TP Achieved ! +512pips locked in! secure your profits, set breakeven, and let the rest run risk-free 💎
❤7👍2🥰2💋1🤩1
GOLD SELL NOW ! 👩🏻💻✨ Entry Point : 4415 - 4420 TP 1 : 4410 TP 2 : 4405 Stoploss : 4425 Trade calm & use proper risk! 💋
❤4💯4🥰3🏆1
Ready CPI🫶🏻
🔥9❤5💯3🤝1😎1
CPI’s Direction! What are your thoughts?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4
CPI EXPECTED IN LESS THAN AN HOUR! 🔴 ⏳ CPI @ 7:30pm GMT+7 Gold is gonna shake the market tonight and I want you all to pay attention. Make sure 2 war accounts are created for fast execution of trades because we know how the spike is like. ✉️ @QuartzAssistant Are you guys ready for CPI?! 🚀
❤7🔥3
Quality Wins ! 💎 TP1 Achieved ! +94pips locked in! secure your profits, set breakeven, and let the rest run risk-free 💎
❤3🔥2😎1
Let's Go Gold ! 💎💎 Running Blues ! +57pips locked in! secure your profits, set breakeven, and let the rest run risk-free 💎
❤3🔥3💯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤3🔥3💯1
GOLD BUY NOW ! 👩🏻💻✨ Entry Point : 4414 - 4409 TP 1 : 4419 TP 2 : 4424 Stoploss : 4404 Trade calm & use proper risk! 💋
❤7🤗2
Ready Guys🫶🏻
❤6🔥2
📈 XAUUSD – M30 Mapping Key Zones: • M30 Resistance: 4428 – 4437 • M30 RBS (Flip Zone): 4384 – 4393 • M30 Support: 4357 – 4366 Market Structure: • Higher TF (M30): bullish → pullback phase • Strong impulsive move up from M30 Support • Current move = retracement back into RBS • Structure remains bullish as long as price holds above 4384 Scenarios: 1. Rejection at RBS → Buy (Primary)📈 → Price reacts around 4384 – 43…
🔥3❤1🎉1
Today’s mapping only with the Elites? Or you guys want it too?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @QuartzAcademyIntl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
CPI’s Direction! What are your thoughts?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Today’s mapping only with the Elites? Or you guys want it too?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What’s your aim for this week?
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quartz Academy 💠” (@QuartzAcademyIntl), 19,884 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QuartzAcademyIntl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.