https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2025-0104/html Radiofrequency radiation-induced gene expression Genes are differentially expressed in cells in response to changes in the internal or external environment. The response is generally an adaptive mechanism to the environmental challenge to restore cell functions to homeostasis. There are numerous studies reporting changes in gene expression in …

Channel
Quantum Life 🇩🇪🇺🇸
@QuantumLifeGermany
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
206subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001458137834 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QuantumLifeGermany |
| Created | 27 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QuantumLifeGermany |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 206 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 205 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 205 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 9 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.22%
- avg views ÷ 206 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 19.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (9 December 2025 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 19 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Yes, your phone has been tested for safety. On a plastic dummy. We’ll let that sink in. ...it is a fact: The Sam dummy is the only test for mobile device radiation in the world. https://www.wearenotsam.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs94KBeIiAo
New Paper: Published 8 April 2026 Human Bioelectromagnetism and the Environment: Introduction to the Problem ABSTRACT "(4) Conclusions: There is a proven interaction between the human body and external electromagnetic fields, as the body is part of the Earth’s electromagnetic landscape and has biophysical mechanisms for coupling with it. The increase in anthropogenic electromagnetic radiation is an electromagnetic …
Experten warnen vor Gefahren durch strahlendes Spielzeug Berlin. Rasseln und Puppen mit Wlan-Verbindung sind ein Milliardenmarkt. Umweltschützer warnen jetzt vor Gefahren durch strahlendes Spielzeug. "Der Schnuller wird schlau, hat einen Sensor. Nimmt das Kind ihn in den Mund, funkt er die Körpertemperatur an das Handy der Eltern. Die Windel, in der ein kleiner Minirechner eingelegt wird, misst Feuchtigkeit und Met…
Gefährlicher Trend: Interaktives Spielzeug mit Funkverbindung Der Markt für IoToys ist in den letzten Jahren rasant gewachsen. [...] Das bedeutet, dass es in naher Zukunft wahrscheinlich kein Kinderzimmer mehr geben wird, in dem es kein intelligentes Spielzeug gibt. https://www.elektrosensibel-ehs.de/strahlendes-emf-spielzeug/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKYN3-GB7y0 https://www.emfdata.org/en
Is there a very direct link between RF / EMF from cell phones and dementia? It seems very much possible, according to the research. Effects of 900-MHz radiation on the hippocampus and cerebellum of adult rats and attenuation of such effects by folic acid and Boswellia sacra "The results showed that EMF caused a significant decrease in total pyramidal and granular cell numbers in the hippocampus, and DG and in Purki…
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
🇺🇸 The World Health Organization (WHO) has been trying to manipulate its long-running assessment of RF–cancer risks, according to a prominent Swiss toxicologist
Hat die WHO über Jahrzehnte die Effekte von Mobilfunkstrahlung klein geredet? Hat die WHO Einfluss auf Forschung genommen? "Keine negativen Auswirkungen!?" - die unabhängige Forschung sieht das anders. „Die Forschung ist sehr politisch“, sagte sie [Meike Mevissen, Professorin an der Universität Bern] Pascal Sigg, einem freiberuflichen Reporter, der für Infosperber arbeitet. „Wir sind immer wieder mit der Haltung kon…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @QuantumLifeGermany. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,184,545 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quantum Life 🇩🇪🇺🇸” (@QuantumLifeGermany), 206 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QuantumLifeGermany.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.