Channel
@QoraRitsar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
185subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001480189249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QoraRitsar |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QoraRitsar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 185 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 187 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 187 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,091 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 37 | 78.7% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 21.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bu ovozni avval ham eshitganman) Oxirgi kadrdagi mem bilan mening reaksiyam tom ma'noda bir xil boʻldi. Gidoraning ovozi kelishi va Godzilla osmondan yerga qulashi — bu men uchun juda kutilmagan kadr boʻldi.
👍3
Severus Snape — oʻta rangpar (oq) terisi, qop-qora sochlari, sovuq qarashlari va burgutsimon burni bilan ajralib turadigan, qora libos kiygan baland boʻyli, ozgʻin inson edi. "Garri Potter" filmlari asar mazmunini toʻliq ochib bera olmagan edi, biroq yangi serial kitobni har bir detaligacha yoritib berishiga meni hech qanday shubham yo'q. Bu men soʻnggi yillarda koʻrgan eng mukammal kitob adaptatsiyalaridan biri boʻ…
👍4
Balki, Germiyonani og‘zi qiyshiqdir?) Har bir sehr qilish uchun shunaqa qo‘l harakatlarini qilish shartmi? Eng oddiy afsunlarga ham shuncha harakat… Avada Kedavrani tasavvur qildim)
👍3
Shuning uchun “Odissey” filmidagi Dengiz xalqlari haqidagi gap oddiy ogohlantirish emas — u insoniyat tarixidagi eng katta sirli burilishlardan biriga ishora qiladi. Itaka ham, Mikenna ham asfala-yu sofillariga ravona bo‘ladi)
👍3
“Odissey” filmini ko‘pchilik ko‘rdi. Film oxiri aslida hamma o‘ylagandek tinchlik bilan tugamaydi. Bu kattaroq urush boshlanishidan oldingi qisqa bir nafas rostlash davri edi, xolos. Eslasangiz, filmda bir muhim gap bor — u shunchaki dialog emas, balki tarixdagi eng sirli davrlardan biriga ishora qiladi. Filmning ikkinchi yarmidan boshlab Dengiz xalqlari haqida so‘z yuritiladi. Ular haqida deyarli hech kim hech nars…
👍3
Yaxshi chiqqan har bir narsaning albatta davomi bo‘lishi shart emas. “Garri Potter” franshizasiga oid bu filmlar va seriallar ham umuman kerak bo‘lmagan loyihalar edi. Serial juda zamonaviy ko‘rinadi. Eng yomoni esa — undagi sehr, umuman, sehrga o‘xshamaydi. Ranglarning haddan tashqari yorqinligi ham o‘sha sehrli va sirli muhitni butunlay yo‘q qilib yuborgan. E’tiborni tortadigan, hayratga soladigan yoki esda qoladi…
👍4❤2
Beyonder aynan shu filmda kelishi kerak. Agar "Yashirin Urushlar" filmida ham uni ko‘rmasak, bo‘ldi — katta ehtimol bilan Beyonderni hech qachon filmlarda ko‘rmaymiz.
👍2
1996-yil: Hal Jordan Yashil Fonusga aylandi. 2006-yil: Hal Jordan Yerning birinchi Yashil Fonusi. 2026-yil: Hal Jordan vafot etdi. Yashil Fonus serialining birinchi qismining o‘zidayoq eng mashhur Yashil Fonus — Hal Jordan vafot etdi. Ammo bu, albatta, bejizga emas... Hal Jordan yana qaytadi. Faqat bu safar u avvalgidek Yashil Fonus sifatida emas, balki Parallax sifatida qaytadi. 2011-yilda chiqqan Yashil Fonus fil…
Vaqt bilan o‘ynasang, vaqt ham senga qarshi o‘ynaydi. Tony Starkning “Qasoskorlar: Yakun” filmida aytgan bu so‘zlari juda ahamiyatsiz oddiy dialogdek tuyulishi mumkin. Ammo aslida bu so'zlar hozir o‘zini faol ravishda qayta yozamoqda. Qasoskorlar vaqt sayohatiga chiqib, Cheksizlik Toshlarini o‘tmishdan olib ketishdi. Bundan tashqari, Stiv Rojersning Peggi bilan birga o‘tmishda qolishi ham haqiqat oqimiga ta’sir ko‘…
👍3
Wandaning “No More Mutants” (“Endi mutantlar yo‘q”) degan mashhur iborasiga qarshi Mister Sinister “No More Wanda” (“Endi Wanda yo‘q”) deb javob qaytargani va Wandani bug‘lantirib o‘ldirib yuborgani yoki Jean Grey Feniks kuchi yordamida “More Mutants” (“Ko‘proq mutantlar”) deb, mutantlar sonini keskin oshirib yuborgani (10x) haqida esa ko‘pchilik umuman gapirmaydi. Hamma faqat Wandaning “No More Mutants” degan ibora…
👍1
Wanda “Endi mutantlar yo‘q” degan iborani qo‘llaganidan so‘ng, mutantlarning qariyb 90 foizi o‘z kuchlaridan ayrilib, oddiy odamlarga aylanib qoladi. Oradan ancha vaqt o‘tib esa Mister Sinister ham unga qarata “Endi Wanda yo‘q” deydi va Wandani voqelikni o‘zgartiruvchi ulkan portlash orqali butunlay yo‘q qiladi. Mister Sinisterning eng asosiy va xavfli qobiliyatlaridan biri — har qanday mutantning kuchlarini klonlas…
👍2
Normal holatda Qizil Hulk kuchliroq. ✅
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @QoraRitsar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Брюс, No Wayne.” (@QoraRitsar), 185 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QoraRitsar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.