Channel
@Q_DruidLittleBitOfEverything
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001987773414 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Q_DruidLittleBitOfEverything |
| Description | Сюда я буду скидывать всякое своё творчество: доделки и не доделки, и поделки и т.п. Ну все ж понасоздавали свои ТГ каналы, вот и я тоже. А что, может что и выйдет любопытное :3 Чат-группа канала: https://t.me/+RRI09lvfyxYwNTgy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Q_DruidLittleBitOfEverything |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 22 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 22 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 16 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
114 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 56 | 49.1% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 9.65% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.65% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 8.77% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 5.26% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2025 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Шош, если творить то в ночь с башкой полной тараканов. Эти скетчи мне не нравятся, но сам перс вроде интересный получился. Такая асоциальная девушка увлекающаяся природой в поисках себя (хах, с самой себя рисовала наверное😂). Может я когда-нибудь разовью эту идею, но щас лень вообще даже править то что мне не нравится в картинке. Просто отмечусь что всё ещё существую, а дальше всё. 🧗♀️🎭👁🗨
😍5❤4❤🔥1🤔1🥰1
Порисовала лапки лисы и стилизованный простой мшистый куб (чисто для отработки цветовой гаммы леса). Думаю в UE5 сделать какую-нибудь стилизованную лесную локацию для того чтоб поучиться навыкам тех-художника, но пока в голове сложно представить как именно это сделать лучше в деталях. Ну и на 3 картинке можете заценить мой нынешний фон рабочего стола, по сути это текстура которую я хочу использовать в локации UE5 но …
❤🔥5❤1💘1🤔1🆒1
Злой волчок укусил солнце за бочок :D Пора спать... 🌙🐺🕳
❤🔥8❤1🥰1
Пробило на рисование, порисовала набросочки-скетчики 🌿🐻🦖
❤🔥6🌚2👏2🤗1🥰1
Чтош, я очень мало стало рисовать. Кое-что нашлось у меня для поста: Скальные пещеры на границе прослойки вод. Я ещё не до конца продумала это за прослойки такие, но есть идея отделять такими "каньонами" некоторые зоны русалочьего мира. Думаю если расстояние от одного края воды до другого будит не слишком велико русалка спокойно сможет перепрыгнуть, а в самой прослойке могут обитать адаптировавшиеся к необычным услов…
❤🔥5❤3🤔2🤩1😍1
Хочу попробовать необычный формат размышлений для постов. И так, в размышлениях о создании воображаемых миров пришла к выводу что в начале должно быть действие/желание/потребность потом уже сама реальность. Это для меня странно, это как в начале человек должен сорвать цветок потом этот цветок должен материализоваться в виде одуванчика. И всё ж таки именно так видимо и должно происходить создание различных вещей и фл…
❤🔥3❤2
Грибочек с ножками. Почему бы и нет) 🍄🟫🦵🏻🫴
❤🔥9🔥3
Сделала грибочки из полимерной глины. В первый раз работала с полимерной глиной и в первый раз работала со светящейся в темноте краской. 🍄🟫♟✨
🔥6❤🔥3🍓1
Сделала в Krita кисточку для лишайника. Пока это самая лучшая кисточка из тех что я эксперементировала. Как разберусь как скидывать кисточки скину её в комментах к посту. 🖌👩🎨🪸
❤🔥6🤯3👍2
Video, posted without a caption
🥰3🤯2
Ну и также сбрасываю весь коллаб в виде изображения без потери качества!
❤🔥3🥰2
Доброго времени суток, Уважаемые Хвоиночки! Однажды, я увидел такой художественный челлендж, как "Цветовой круг", где имеется круг с разбивкой на 8 секторов с цветами радуги и розовым. В секторах рисуются персонажи с соответствующей палитрой. Меня это крайне заинтересовало и хотелось сделать CWC(Color Wheel Challenge). Поэтому, вначале лета я привлек к этой идее своих друзей-художников, дабы было интереснее и куриро…
❤🔥5🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Q_DruidLittleBitOfEverything. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,189,762 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Q_Druid: little bit of everything” (@Q_DruidLittleBitOfEverything), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Q_DruidLittleBitOfEverything.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.