Channel
@QAonIslam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
261subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 12 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002458669075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QAonIslam |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QAonIslam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 04:38 | 261 | +9 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 09:22 | 252 | no change |
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:47 | 252 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 October 2026 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 544 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 09:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ramaḍān Fatwa #1 | Q: How authentic are the following two Hadiths? The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: Fast and you will be healthy. And: Sleeping in Ramadan is an act of worship. A: First: The phrase Fast and you will be healthy is a Daif (weak) Hadith. It was related by Al-Tabarany in Al-Awsat, Abu Nuaym on the authority of Abu Hurayrah, and Ibn Ady on the authority of Ibn Abbas. The Sanad (chain of n…
Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh Starting tomorrow, the 1st of Jumādā al-Awwal 1448, we’ll be sharing rulings, reminders, and fatwas about the blessed month of Ramadān, in shā’ Allāh. Let’s start preparing our hearts and minds early — may Allāh bless us to reach Ramadān in the best of health and imān. Telegram: https://t.me/QAonIslam WhatsApp: https://chat.whatsapp.com/Ieqop4oONgwEaC2o5P4i79?s=cl&p=i…
Child Rearing and Some Rulings Regarding New-borns #6 | Celebrating the Naming of a New-born | Permanent Committee Q: Is it permissible to gather loved ones, neighbours, and friends for the naming of a new-born, or is such a celebration an innovation or a disbelief? A: Celebrating the naming of a baby is not from the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, nor did it occur during the time of his Companions. If people d…
Child Rearing and Some Rulings Regarding New-borns #5 | When to Name a Child | Permanent Committee Q: What is the best day to name a new-born: on the day he is born or on the seventh day? A: There is some leeway in the issue of naming new-borns; there is evidence that supports naming the new-born on the day of its birth or on its 7th day. It is recorded by Al-Bukhari and Muslim that Sahl bin Sa‘idi said that Al-Mun…
Child Rearing and Some Rulings Regarding New-borns #4 | If the Baby is Born Early | Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen Q: My child was born in the seventh month in an unnatural delivery. Do all of the rulings of new-borns apply to him? A: Yes, if a baby is born anytime after the fourth month, then he is most definitely alive, because the spirit is blown into fine when four months are completed. So if he is born dead after that f…
Child Rearing and Some Rulings Regarding New-borns #3 | How Long Before the Legitimate Time for 'Aqiqah Expires | Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen Q: If the slaughter for the ‘Aqiqah takes place on the twenty-first, is this permissible? A: Yes, there is no harm in such 'Aqiqah, but it is better to perform it during the fixed period. • [Fataawaa Islamiyah Vol 8, Page no.337] Share the link so others can benefit: https://t.me/…
👍1
Child Rearing and Some Rulings Regarding New-borns #2 | How Long Before the Legitimate Time for 'Aqiqah Expires | Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen Q: Is the period of the ‘Aqiqah one or two weeks, or twenty-one days as some people say? Can we slaughter the animal for the ‘Aqiqah on the ninth or tenth day, for example? A: Based on a Hadith, it is best to perform the ‘Aqiqah on the seventh day. Some scholars have said that if th…
Child Rearing and Some Rulings Regarding New-borns #1 | Is semen alive and does it has a spirit? | Permanent Committee Q: The spirit is blown into the foetus after four months; do we understand from this that the sperm that unites with the ovum, and from which the foetus develops, is not alive? A: Both man’s sperm and a woman’s ovum are Aliste with a life that is unique and suitable to them, as long as Allah wills …
Some False Beliefs #8 | Harun Ar-Rasheed was a Righteous Khalifah | Shaykh Ibn Jibreen Q: Some history books such as “A Thousand and One Nights” claim that the Khalifah Harun Ar-Rashid knew nothing but playing, drinking, and dancing with singers. Is what is written about him true? A: These are blatant lies; he was one of the most righteous of Khalifahs. He used to alternate between Hajj and Jihad each year. Many co…
Some False Beliefs #7 | First-Aid to A Non-Muslim | Shaykh Ibn Baz Q: When a Muslim applies first aid to a non-Muslim, does that make him his brother? A: If a Muslim applies first aid to a non-Muslim, or a disbeliever who is not at war with the Muslims, then that does not make him his brother. This is not unlawful for him, even — if he is treating a woman. But he will be rewarded for the good he did, even if he was…
Some False Beliefs #6 | You Should Praise and Thank Allah Almighty | Shaykh Ibn Baz Q: If things go well for me or if I succeed in some endeavour, I feel that I am distracted by worldly affairs not because I am good, but because I am a sinner and I am being given respite until Judgement will overtake me. Please advise me. A: When you succeed in some endeavour, you should praise and thank Allah Almighty for His favo…
Some False Beliefs #5 | The Rock at Bait Al-Maqdis | Permanent Committee Q: Some people say that the stone that was used on the day the Prophet ﷺ ascended to the heavens floats in the sky. Is this true? A: Everything in creation stays in its place by the will of Allah Almighty. Allah Almighty says: إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُمْسِكُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ أَن تَزُولَا ۚ وَلَئِن زَالَتَا إِنْ أَمْسَكَهُمَا مِنْ أَحَدٍ مِّن …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @QAonIslam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IslamQA” (@QAonIslam), 261 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QAonIslam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.