Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Pump With Alon

@PumpWithAlon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,914subscribers

-103 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003879395576
TypeChannel
Username@PumpWithAlon
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PumpWithAlon

Growth

1,9142,0171,965.57 August 2026 — 2,017 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,017 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,989 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,914 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -103. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,899–2,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:421,914-75
8 Aug 2026, 18:531,989-28
7 Aug 2026, 20:332,017no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:432,017first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.60%
avg views ÷ 1,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
165
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,292
Reactions total480
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

480 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 632568203174110966510121.0%
custom 63257095195318042986814.2%
custom 63257622402553625365912.3%
custom 63278220893906549335511.5%
custom 52424519077247168935010.4%
custom 6325710477309511186326.67%
🔥193.96%
custom 6325722765210945269132.71%
💯132.71%
122.50%
custom 5197673179992038546112.29%
custom 5237904005509684537102.08%
custom 5427107837568360763102.08%
custom 523789956021853403191.88%
custom 511194041008364117371.46%
custom 523574520462286105140.833%
custom 524902084545560582440.833%
custom 632570017368296836320.417%
custom 632580679624609151210.208%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 480reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PumpWithAlon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC48 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Calledt at 24k mc Got 13x on $BR1

custom 51119404100836411734custom 52490208454556058244custom 63256820317411096652

6 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC93 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‍BR1: INFINITE ($BR1 - Pump) 🪅 CA: 8T6rjb3eFjcj4gpJ2oztFg6fceq YfgrRmifPiBx5pump https://br1game.com/ https://x.com/BR1INFINITE Already call it in a lounge

custom 63256820317411096657custom 63278220893906549334🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC113 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Called at 37K MC 🚀 51x ➜ 258x ➜ 348x 📈 Last post update: 258x → Now 348x 🔥 That’s another +90x since the last update.

custom 63256820317411096658custom 63257622402553625366custom 63278220893906549335🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC110 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Good morning folks

custom 632576224025536253610custom 63257227652109452698🔥6custom 63258067962460915121

5 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC112 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Called at 57k mc Got 13x on $SHUMAI If you printed on it hit me some reaction

custom 632568203174110966510custom 632570951953180429810custom 63257622402553625365custom 63257227652109452691

5 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$Shumai rug so hard guy But those who got it early when I call in a private lounge

5 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC119 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

GM everyone it’s time to hunt and win guys

custom 632568203174110966511custom 632782208939065493310custom 51119404100836411733🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC162 views29 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Called $CATE at $80K MC. First pnl : 121x ➜ 128x Reposted it again at $24M MC and it still climbed to $82.1M MC, a 3.42x move from that update. From the original call, that’s now 1026x. 🚀

custom 632576224025536253610custom 63278220893906549337custom 63257227652109452694custom 63256820317411096653custom 63257095195318042983💯2

3 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC141 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Chonketha [258x] ├ Alon_Alphas └ 43K → 11.07M (15d) HcfnJxLov6tY8i1dq9uYRRZKCvxADPpovcfkyXzdpump

custom 632570951953180429810custom 52379040055096845379custom 63256820317411096656🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC198 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Chart of when I call out $CATE CALLED AT 80k mc A massive win to everyone to printed on it

custom 542710783756836076310custom 52378995602185340319custom 63256820317411096654custom 52379040055096845371

2 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC158 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 524245190772471689311custom 632570951953180429810custom 52357452046228610514

2 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC151 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

­💊 Catecoin ($CATE) 🔥#1 └ #SOL | 7d | 👁️2.8K 📊 Stats ├ USD $0.0255 (+105%) ├ MC $24.55M ├ Vol $8.55M ├ LP $362.4K ├ Sup 964.4M/964.4M ├ 1H +17% 🅑1.8K Ⓢ1.6K └ ATH $26.81M (-8% / 12m) 🔗 Socials [3y] └ 𝕏 [♽] • TG • Web • [about] 🔒 Security ├ Fresh 3% 1D | 34% 7D ├ Top 10 13% | 33.1K (total) ├ TH 3.0|2.2|1.4|1.3|1.1 ├ Insider 861 (12%) ├ Dev Sold 🟢 🅳 └ DEX Paid 🟢 [in

custom 632568203174110966512custom 519767317999203854611custom 63257095195318042984

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PumpWithAlon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pump With Alon” (@PumpWithAlon), 1,914 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PumpWithAlon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.