Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

YO vs Smash

@Pudrich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

388subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002220295277
TypeChannel
Username@Pudrich
DescriptionСотрудничество - @walor1337 По всем вопросам - @walor1337
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Pudrich

Growth

3887 Aug 2026, 12:55 — 388 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:03 — 388 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:558 Aug 2026, 06:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387–389 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:03388no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:55388first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
346
Videos
18
Links
237

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡1742.5%
👎1230.0%
615.0%
custom 5415694013518867831410.0%
💩12.50%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2026, 18:06 UTC≈2,100 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну всего 9 месяцев они искали пост в канале пудры 🚽

🤡7

31 Dec 2025, 21:00 UTC≈2,440 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐎 Всех с 2026 годом! У кого то он уже наступил, а у кого то нет, но желаю всем в новом году достичь своих целей. Пудре уже похуй, тут текст удалил. Главное не потеряйте себя в этом году подписчики и не важно, будете вы за мной следить или нет. Ведь как минимум я у вас всегда останусь в памяти 2026 будет более чем 2025 в чем чем!)

👎31💩1

31 Dec 2025, 16:43 UTC≈1,270 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎄 Этот год был непростым! Новый год уже наступил в много где странах, поэтому с наступающим или уже с Новым годом вас 🎅 Во второй половине этого года я стал меньше активничать в целом как пудра. Но год вышел не плохим Словил лфг на гифтах, рагал всякую хуйню на газе, токены от президентов и тд., приобрел новые знакомства и самое главное аудиторию! Спасибо что были в этом году со мной. Писать дохуя не хочу, ведь не

👎2🤡1

31 Dec 2025, 16:37 UTC818 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо что следили за мной в 2025 году, год вышел для меня в медиа плохим. Ведь я почти ничего не писал и обитал в @WalorNonBan)

👎1

19 Dec 2025, 21:44 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пошли иксы 🙂 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😺 Пудра. Подписаться. | Чат | Трейд-бот

1👎1

8 Dec 2025, 14:41 UTC858 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кстати UFC боксы торгуются в плюс. Себестоимость 2700*0.015=40.5$ Продажа: 32*1.66=53.12$ Ну и вот собственно вопрос, фаддеры что с лицом 🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😺 Пудра. Подписаться. | Чат | Трейд-бот

🤡4👎1

5 Dec 2025, 20:06 UTC663 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На самом деле конвейер как многие просили и прекратился. И теперь просто будут коллабы с селебрити 😂

👎1

5 Dec 2025, 19:43 UTC592 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я просто не понимаю людей, которые не хотят брать гифты, ведь не смогут потом в иксы слить. Я блять после нового года думал, что гифты больше не будут иксовать. Ведь все про них знают и какого хуя флор должен быть больше потом. Я даже не допускал толком, что гифты будут почти весь 2025 кормить если ты с ретейла их взял и потом слил после улучшений 🚀🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😺 Пудра. Подписаться. | Чат | Трейд-бот

👎1

5 Dec 2025, 19:36 UTC527 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А почему каждый долбоеб ноет про новые гифты? Ну если вам не нравится, что конвейер продолжается. То это было понятно еще после Хэллоуина. И ныть по 105 кругу нет смысла А если вы всё таки смирились со станком, то крутая коллаба все таки с UFC. Тут не с каждым же бойцом отдельные гифты сделали, а всё в одном) 🐈 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😺 Пудра. Подписаться. | Чат | Трейд-бот

1👎1

1 Dec 2025, 21:51 UTC791 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Они о чём то начинают подозревать ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😺 Пудра. Подписаться. | Чат | Трейд-бот

1👎1

26 Nov 2025, 11:55 UTC646 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У меня ощущение, что Дурову просто нравится наёбывать лохов всяких. Что в ВК с голосами, рейтингом и тд. Что тут с гифтами и тд. Ну ему прям наверное доставляет удовольствие, что всякие дурочки в него верят, а ему просто похуй и он сидит самолетики запускает с крыши или подарочек самолетика 😂 Он не ради денег, а за идею наеба гоев! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😺 Пудра. Подписаться. | Чат | Трейд-бот

2

26 Nov 2025, 11:50 UTC514 viewsread 8 August 2026

🤔 Павел Дуров же вроде умный чел, ну и Николай тоже. Ну почему блять они не могут догадаться откупать этот маленький рынок на пару миллион $ Чтобы потом заключать партнерства с медийками, на миллионы $ Ну вот почему так? Может быть я конечно не понимаю, а может Дуров верит в силу коммьюнити и смотрит что оно будет делать… ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😺 Пудра. Подписаться. | Чат | Трейд-бот

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Pudrich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 620,909 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YO vs Smash” (@Pudrich), 388 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pudrich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.