Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

桜 * 𝓟etalie 𐙚

@Ptalies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

87subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004361340559
TypeChannel
Username@Ptalies
DescriptionThe Place with a 𝔍apanese Soul ౨ৎ Owner * 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗮 𐙚 𝓐non : @EveliSR_bot 𝓘nformation ⌗. @InfoPetalie “ Goal 100
Created28 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/Ptalies

Growth

808783.56 August 2026 — 80 subscribers7 August 2026 — 87 subscribers9 August 2026 — 87 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–88 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:4787no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:2587+7
6 Aug 2026, 08:3280first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1264.1%
avg views ÷ 87 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held9 (28 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total8,798
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Videos
1
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ptalies. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC16 viewsread 9 August 2026

ставьте ++ если понравился мт или взяли что-то, также буду рада звездам 🤍🤍

9 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC17 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Nᴇw Ꮲᴏsᴛ 🎬 𝓘nfo Design Ideas ×10 🎬🌟 « 𝔐aterial In Ꮯhᴀnnᴇl » 🌟🤩 ⌞ If you took «+» in the comments ⌝

4 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈3,200 views0 reactions7 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Nᴇw Ꮲᴏst 🩷 𝓥ideo Avatars Design ×50 🤩🤍 « 𝔐aterial In Ꮯhᴀnnᴇl » 🐇🐇 ⌞ If you took «+» in the comments ⌝

31 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC≈4,300 views0 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Nᴇw Ꮲᴏsᴛ🐚𝓐vatars Design ×100 🌟🤩« 𝔐aterial In Ꮯhᴀnᴇl » 🟨🤩 ⌞ If you took «+» in the comments ⌝

31 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC421 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

🤩 Written By t.me/Ptalies @.OfficialRami 🦋 info anon Even The Moon Waits The Spring 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Ptalies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 299,624 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“桜 * 𝓟etalie 𐙚” (@Ptalies), 87 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ptalies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.