Channel
@PsyopScout
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002306265209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PsyopScout |
| Created | 14 October 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PsyopScout |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 18 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 18 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3. Exchange Shills & Soft Coordination Stayed tiny/under-radar for weeks post-launch. Then the flood: • HTX: “Still vibing…” posts + orange cat art; reply raids. Notably, HTX has used artwork and images taken directly from the $VIBECOIN Telegram community channel in their promotional posts (e.g., GM vibes and cat memes mirroring TG creations). • Poloniex: Similar subtle nods, including posts with chill/vibe themes …
$VIBECOIN (Vibing Cat Coin) Deep Dive: Lore, Deployer Theories, Shills, Elon/Doge Ties, and the Shadow Play This is the full, polished version—sourced from on-chain data, the official lore on dontdoubturvibe.com, X timelines, community deep dives, and cross-referenced signals. Launched anonymously on Solana, it was engineered with uncanny precision around the Dogecoin/Elon universe. It’s more than a meme coin; it’s a…
https://x.com/imtiazmadmood/status/1885286573190611145?s=46
https://x.com/wordsarewordz/status/1878908240274309273
Hearing things… things that wouldn’t even FAZE you… you’re too used to being lied to… if I told you, you’d just think it was another $PSYOP anyhow.
Video, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Imagine… Caesar thinks I’m Kobe… what am I? Some mastermind or something?
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
🫵🤡
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PsyopScout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PsyopScout named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Psyop Scout” (@PsyopScout), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PsyopScout.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.