Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

انجمن علمي روانپزشكي

@PsychiatryAssociation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003314233460
TypeChannel
Username@PsychiatryAssociation
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PsychiatryAssociation

Growth

384139.56 August 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:3441+3
10 Aug 2026, 20:3138no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:1938first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
343.9%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
141
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.557%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held11 (11 July 202623 July 2026)
Views total564
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC359 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📸 گزارش تصویری سمینار «دوره مقدماتی زوج‌درمانگری (اختلالات سایکوسکشوال) | از تعارض تا ترمیم» 🧠✨ سمینار «از تعارض تا ترمیم» به همت انجمن‌های علمی روان‌پزشکی و روان‌شناسی شبکه نخبگان ایران با همکاری سینماژ، روز یک‌شنبه ۲۸ تیرماه در سالن دانشجو دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران با حضور پرشور دانشجویان، متخصصان و علاقه‌مندان برگزار شد. 👨‍🏫 در این برنامه، شرکت‌کنندگان از مباحث ارزشمند ارائه‌شده توسط دکتر حمیدرضا نمازی، دکتر محمد

2

17 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC57 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

کتاب: محکم در آغوشم بگیر (Hold Me Tight) ✍️ اثر: دکتر سو جانسون (Sue Johnson) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ با ما در کانال انجمن روانپزشکی همراه باشید... 👇🏻 | @PsychiatryAssociation |

17 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC47 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

☕️ کافه روان‌پزشکی | علمِ عشق و در آغوش گرفتن 📖 📚 معرفی کتاب: محکم در آغوشم بگیر (Hold Me Tight) ✍️ اثر: دکتر سو جانسون (Sue Johnson) دکتر جانسون، بنیان‌گذار روش "درمان متمرکز بر هیجان" (EFT)، در این کتاب فوق‌العاده علمی و در عین حال روان، توضیح می‌دهد که روابط زناشویی یک پیوند بیولوژیک برای بقا است، درست مثل نیاز نوزاد به مادر. 💡 نکته کتاب: دعواهای زن و شوهر بر سر پول، خانواده یا کارهای خانه، در واقع پوششی برای

16 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC101 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🧠❤️ دوره مقدماتی زوج‌درمانگری (اختلالات سایکوسکشوال) از تعارض تا ترمیم 📅 زمان: یکشنبه ۱۴۰۵/۰۴/۲۸ ⏰ ساعت: ۱۵ الی ۱۹ 📍 مکان: سالن دانشجو | دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران 🎓 مزایا: ✅ دو گواهی معتبر (شبکه نخبگان ایران + جهاد دانشگاهی) ✅ فایل PDF آموزشی ✅ دسترسی به ویدئوی کامل سمینار ✅ پذیرایی برای شرکت‌کنندگان حضوری 👨‍🏫 مدرسین: 🔹 دکتر حمیدرضا نمازی عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران دکترای تخصصی اخلاق پزشکی بی‌قراری،

15 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC25 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🛠 زنگ مهارت | مهارت ACR در واکنش به خبرهای خوب همدلی در شادی؛ راز پنهان روابط پایدار 🥂 همه می‌دانیم که در روزهای سخت باید کنار همسرمان باشیم. اما دکتر شلی گیبل (Shelly Gable) در مقاله‌ای معروف نشان داد که واکنش ما به "خبرهای خوبِ" شریک عاطفی، پیش‌بینی‌کننده بسیار قوی‌تری برای طول عمر رابطه است! 🟢 واکنش سازنده و فعال (ACR): همسر: "پروژه‌ام امروز تایید شد!" واکنش درست: توقف کار، ارتباط چشمی مستقیم، نشان دادن هیجان

14 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC22 viewsread 10 August 2026

💡پاسخ تشریحی: گزینه ۲ (دیوارکشی یا Stonewalling) این سکوت معمولاً نشانه بی‌تفاوتی یا میل به آزار دادن نیست! در اوج تعارض، وقتی ضربان قلب بالا می‌رود، فرد دچار «طغیان فیزیولوژیک» (Flooding) می‌شود. در این حالت، قشر منطقی مغز خاموش شده و فرد برای محافظت از خودش در برابر این اضافه‌بار هیجانی، ارتباط را کاملاً قطع (دیوارکشی) می‌کند. ✅ نحوه مداخله دقیق در این لحظات بحرانی و ترمیم این چرخه معیوب را در سمینار بزرگ سه‌شنبه

14 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC23 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

این ترم اولین مقاله‌ت رو مینویسی... 👨🏻‍🎓👩🏻‍🎓 استاد تمام مقاله نویسی شو! هفت دوره جامع + هفت سرتیفیکیت انگلیسی به قیمت یک دوره... 💯 آموزش صفر تا صد هرچیزی که برای نوشتن انواع مقالات isi لازم دارید، شامل: ✅نوشتن مقالات اصیل ✅نوشتن مقالات کیس ریپورت ✅نوشتن مقالات مرور سیستماتیک ✅آمار در مقاله نویسی ✅انتخاب مجله و سابمیت مقاله ✅سرچ در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی ✅رفرنس نویسی با اندنوت ⏰ بیش از 35 ساعت آموزش تخصصی، همراه با

13 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

❓ به عنوان درمانگر، واکنش مرد (سکوت و خیرگی) به احتمال زیاد نشان‌دهنده چیست؟

  1. 1️⃣ بی‌تفاوتی و ویژگی‌های شخصیت خودشیفته (Narcissism)0%
  2. 2️⃣ تکنیک دیوارکشی (Stonewalling) به دلیل اضافه‌بار هیجانی0%
  3. 3️⃣ پرخاشگری منفعلانه (Passive-Aggressive) برای کنترل زن80%
  4. 4️⃣ گزلایتینگ (Gaslighting) برای مقصر جلوه دادن همسر20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

13 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC22 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @medicalwebinarrPhoto

🛑🛑 آخرین مهلت ثبت نام 🟠نوشتن پروپوزال همواره از مهمترین دغدغه‌های دانشجویان بوده است. ✅ در این کارگاه ویژه، تمام جزئیات لازم جهت نگارش پروپوزال بیان خواهد‌ شد. به‌گونه‌ای که با گذراندن این کارگاه، شما از گذراندن هر کارگاه آموزشی دیگر بی‌نیاز می شوید. 📝کارگاه پروپوزال نویسی با کمک هوش مصنوعی 💎 این کارگاه ویژه به شما کمک می‌کند نگارش پروپوزال را در کوتاهترین زمان ممکن انجام دهید. 🟢 مخاطبین کارگاه: تمامی رشته ها

12 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @wiroidPhoto

🐍💻 کدنویسی رو شروع کن، آینده‌ات رو بساز! 🚀 🔥 آموزش ساده و پروژه‌محور برنامه نویسی پایتون ⚡ یادگیری مهارت‌های کاربردی برای ورود به دنیای برنامه‌نویسی 🧠 ساختن ذهنیت یک برنامه‌نویس حرفه‌ای ✅ارائه گواهی معتبر دوزبانه 👨‍🏫 مدرس: مهندس سید محمدحسین بهادر 📌 فقط یک قدم تا شروع مسیر حرفه‌ای فاصله داری 💚 ⭐️شروع‌دوره: یکشنبه ۱۴ تیر ۱۴۰۵ 📞 ثبت‌نام و کسب اطلاعات بیشتر: 09221327874 @hadaf7478 (روبیکا)

11 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC26 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📚 ایستگاه شواهد | تله اضطرابی-اجتنابی در تئوری دلبستگی 🧲 چرا جذب آدم‌های اشتباه می‌شویم؟ (تله دلبستگی) بر اساس تئوری دلبستگی بالبی (John Bowlby)، سبک ارتباطی ما در کودکی شکل می‌گیرد. یکی از مخرب‌ترین چرخه‌های زناشویی، ترکیب "فرد مضطرب" و "فرد اجتنابی" است. 📌 چرخه معیوب: فرد مضطرب برای احساس امنیت، مدام به دنبال تایید و نزدیک شدن است (تماس‌های مکرر، چک کردن). این رفتار باعث فعال شدن سیستم خطر در فرد اجتنابی می‌شود

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @PsychiatryAssociation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

❓ به عنوان درمانگر، واکنش مرد (سکوت و خیرگی) به احتمال زیاد نشان‌دهنده چیست؟

  1. 1️⃣ بی‌تفاوتی و ویژگی‌های شخصیت خودشیفته (Narcissism)0%
  2. 2️⃣ تکنیک دیوارکشی (Stonewalling) به دلیل اضافه‌بار هیجانی0%
  3. 3️⃣ پرخاشگری منفعلانه (Passive-Aggressive) برای کنترل زن80%
  4. 4️⃣ گزلایتینگ (Gaslighting) برای مقصر جلوه دادن همسر20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 469,772 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“انجمن علمي روانپزشكي” (@PsychiatryAssociation), 41 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PsychiatryAssociation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.