Channel
@Psy_doc_sokolov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
840subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001159886507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Psy_doc_sokolov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Psy_doc_sokolov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 840 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 831 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 831 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,623 |
| Reactions total | 126 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
552 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 232 | 42.0% | |
| 🔥 | 176 | 31.9% | |
| 💯 | 110 | 19.9% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 2.54% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 1.27% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 0.906% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.362% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 552reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💬 Приходят за рецептом, а уходят с планом Сегодня совместный пост, и сначала знакомство. Юлия Пучкова психолог, ведёт канал «Кабинет Пучковой» (@yuliyapuchkovaa). Мы часто пишем об одном и том же с разных сторон, поэтому сделали пару текстов: у неё сегодня о том, когда человеку с психотерапии пора к психиатру. У меня - о том, что бывает, когда он до психиатра дошёл. 🩺 «Доктор, выпишите что-нибудь, чтобы отпустило».…
🔥17👍2🆒2
«Как вам на этой схеме?» — что вы обычно отвечаете?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
«Мне доктор назначил». Так отвечают, когда спрашиваю, почему человек третий год пьёт одно и то же. Не «мне помогает», не «мне подошло». Назначил. Как будто на этом разговор и заканчивается. Спрашиваю: а как вам на этой схеме? Отвечают «нормально». Ещё через пару минут выясняется, что тревога тлеет фоном, радости нет, побочки надоели, но всё это идёт в графу «нормально», потому что жаловаться вроде не на что. Докт…
👍17
🩺 «У меня выгорание». Самый популярный самодиагноз последних лет. Слово удобное: в нём слышится уважительная причина (много работал), в нём нет стигмы, и к нему как будто приложен рецепт (отдохнуть). Депрессия звучит страшнее. Поэтому её всё чаще называют выгоранием. Иногда это правда выгорание. А иногда, под удобным словом месяцами прячется депрессия, и человек лечит её отпуском, который не работает. Разберем раз…
👍15
Проведя сотни приёмов я обратил внимание: тревожные извиняются. Извиняются, что «занимают время с ерундой». Что «опять накрутили». Что «другим хуже, а я тут». Человек приходит с тем, что месяцами не спит и не живёт, и первым делом просит прощения за то, что пришёл. Я не тороплю этот момент. За «извините» обычно стоит вся жизнь, прожитая с ощущением, что ты помеха. Однако, тревога не делает человека обузой. Хотя е…
💯34👍12🔥8🫡7👏5
Спрашивайте.
👍7
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥19👍1
🩺 Про алкоголь с антидепрессантами меня спрашивают каждую неделю. Про кофе тоже. А вот про жару за все годы не спросил ни один человек. И зря: у лета с психотропными препаратами есть свои отношения, и знать о них лучше до отпуска, а не после. Когда во Франции разбирали последствия высокой смертности в жару 2003 года, обнаружилась закономерность: пожилые люди, принимавшие психотропные препараты, гибли значительно ча…
🔥22👍6
Контроль — любимая анестезия тревоги. Пока всё расписано, перепроверено и под рукой, беспокойство тише. Поэтому самые тревожные часто выглядят самыми собранными: -списки, -запасные планы, -«я сам прослежу». Устают они не от дел. А от круглосуточного дежурства при мире, который и не думал застать их врасплох.
💯28👍6🔥5👏2🤪2
🩺 «Доктор, а тревога не сажает сердце? Оно колотится, иногда замирает, ноет в груди. Кажется, я так до инфаркта себя доведу». Один из самых частых страхов на приёме. И в нём спрятаны сразу два: сама тревога и страх, что она добьёт сердце. Начну с хорошей новости. Потом факт. ❤️🔥 Приступ тревоги сердце не сломает Когда тревога зашкаливает, тело жмёт на газ: выброс адреналина, пульс до 120–150, толчки в груди, нехва…
👍9💘5🔥1
🩺 «Доктор, а почему с антидепрессантами нельзя алкоголь? За всё время приёма выпил дважды по 0,3 пива, и оба раза на следующий день тревога сильнее обычного. Это реальная реакция или я себе внушил? И как быть, если корпоратив?» Вопрос пришёл в личку, но касается почти каждого, кто лечится. Скорее всего, вы это не выдумали. 🌅 Почему утро тревожнее У мозга есть педаль тормоза (система ГАМК) и педаль газа (глутамат)…
🔥24👍11✍2
💬 «Возьми себя в руки» — самая бесполезная фраза, которую слышит тревожный человек. Её говорят с лучшими намерениями. И каждый раз она делает хуже, потому что тревожный и так держит себя в руках. Изо всех сил, круглосуточно. Он только этим и занят. Сказать ему «соберись», всё равно что сказать утопающему «просто не тони». За этой фразой стоит ошибка. Мы привыкли считать любую тревогу чертой характера, которую можн…
👍30🔥7💯5👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Psy_doc_sokolov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
«Как вам на этой схеме?» — что вы обычно отвечаете?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 59,101 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Михаил Соколов|ПсиДок🩺” (@Psy_doc_sokolov), 840 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psy_doc_sokolov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.