Channel
@Psy_Seizure
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
38subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003555289151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Psy_Seizure |
| Description | Иногда у меня бывает такое, что я хочу сказать правду..😮💨 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 25 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Psy_Seizure |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 38 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 38 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 April 2026 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 63 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
27 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 74.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем охае даттебае, как долго в этом фд будут высасывать конфликты? В тейки тупо невозможно зайти, всегда кто-то пытается найти во что ввязаться, давайте я сделаю программу по типу пусть говорят?? Нет мне реально интересно собрать этих типов и чисто за ними наблюдать, борьба у кого тупее аргументы 🥰 #𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒀𝒗𝒆
❤1👍1💘1
Signed 𝒀𝒗𝒆ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
Короче, вот этих двух я пропускаю, к ним вопросы не пишу. У первых ссылка поменялась (если админ тот же, скиньте в бота пжшк🙏). Ну а вторые закрылись. Так что буду вопросы на интервью ксаве из новостей писать
❤2
Signed 𝑽𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒂ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
Сорян, ребятки, что пропадаем. Сами понимаете, конец года, сессии, экзамены. После 15-20 июня работу возобновим полным ходом, дождитесь, пупсики🥺🫰
❤1👍1
Signed 𝑽𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒂ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
🩸🏐😀🏐🏐🎾🏐🥎🎾🏐😀 😀😀😀😀😀🥎😀🩸🩸🩸🩸 [🪄] — [Wesh! Salut tout le monde!] 🌫️Вечер к вам в хаты, дорогие мои вампирчики) Рубрика «Осторожно, Краски!» 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 Летна горячих срачей от меня любимого, для вас любимых мною)) Под постом всеми нами известного новостного канала Новости земель рассвета) 🌫️Вспыхнула волна негодования со стороны флуда «Адам и Эва», спор возник на основе того, что кто-то обвиняет кого-то в накрутке и не то…
❤2
https://t.me/mlbbfloodsgossip/3524 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 [🪄] — Bonjour, Madame ou Monsieur? Я совершенно свободен)
🩸🏐😀🏐🏐🎾🏐🥎🎾🏐😀 😀😀😀😀😀🥎😀🩸🩸🩸🩸 [🪄] — [Wesh! Salut tout le monde!] 🌫️Рад буду с вами познакомиться, я Сиселион, новый администратор данного канала. Моей основной рубрикой будет «Осторожно, Краски!» 🌫️Помимо обычных новостей, тут будет прямая жёлтая пресса комьюнити МЛББ — всеми нами любимые скандалы, сплетни, слухи и много другое. 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 🌫️Ну так вот, я решил, что начну со вторника вносить новости с флудов, а сегодня мо…
❤3❤🔥2
Моё первое интервью, немного волнительно. Если есть какие-то недочёты, прошу сообщить. Для меня это был очень интересный опыт, хотелось бы повторить... Записывайтесь. ☝️ #𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒀𝒗𝒆
❤1👍1💘1
Signed 𝒀𝒗𝒆ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
ᘛ⁐ᕐᐷ 🅟🅐🅡🅣 𝟯 :: ну да ладно, у меня много сплетников, так что кто-то когда-то мне сказал, что ты являешься одним из админов в обществе актёров. опровергнешь этот слух или промолчишь? Ну блять я даже не знаю, что на это ответить. Мне ведь нужно быть честным. Уверен после моих слов, это все обернётся скандалом. Но я не удовлетворю желание всех. Я не был там админом. :: заинтриговал прям. Конечно. В этом и суть интер…
❤2
Signed 𝒀𝒗𝒆ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
ᘛ⁐ᕐᐷ 🅟🅐🅡🅣 𝟰 :: чтобы ты хотел сказать напоследок? или есть какие то вопросы ко мне? Конечно. Вопросы есть всегда. Да и рассказать я не все могу. Потому что я все рассчитал и наверное ещё годик буду ебать всем мозги. А как вы решили открыть свой проект? :: проект мы открывали с подругой по причине того, что нам хотелось излагать наши мысли и догадки на публику, а не в комментариях под чужими постами... анонимность…
❤4
Signed 𝒀𝒗𝒆ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ 🅘🅝🅣🅔🅡🅥🅘🅔🅦 у Ив. ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ 🅟🅐🅡🅣 𝟭 всем привет, сегодня у меня в гостях немало известная личность: ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ •𝙁𝘼𝙐𝙎𝙏•ᴮᴿᴬᵁᴺ•ᴬᵒᶠᴵ• :: привет, ты готов? Здравствуйте - здравствуйте. Не заставил долго ждать? :: нет, что вы! как к вам лучше обращаться? Просто Фауст. :: хорошо, для начала хотела бы узнать, как вы всё-таки обрели свою первую узнаваемость? Хмм. Это случилось довольно спонтанно. Я ходил по флудам и встречал в…
❤2
Signed 𝒀𝒗𝒆ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
ᘛ⁐ᕐᐷ 🅟🅐🅡🅣 𝟮 :: ни для кого не секрет, что ты администратор в тейках. Как ты попал туда и какие у тебя отношения с другими админами? Сплоченный ли там коллектив или все действуют по отдельности? Попал я туда совершенно спонтанно. Точнее я просто хотел приключений на пятую точку. Пришел с твина, но потом раскрыл себя Кей. Там уже пошло поехало, мне было сложно общаться сдержанно и не в своем стиле, когда я был Арло…
❤2
Signed 𝒀𝒗𝒆ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
Конечно
Signed 𝑽𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒂ᵖˢʸᶜʰᵒ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Psy_Seizure. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 388,802 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Psy_Seizure named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙋𝙨𝙮𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙞𝙘 𝙨𝙚𝙞𝙯𝙪𝙧𝙚” (@Psy_Seizure), 38 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psy_Seizure.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.