Channel
@Psy_RR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
523subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004318537546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Psy_RR |
| Description | مرکز آموزش کاربردی روانشناسی همراه من، عرفان اصلانی Psychology With Me, Erfan Aslani Ψ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Psy_RR |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 523 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 September 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,155 |
| Reactions total | 270 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
270 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 160 | 59.3% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 14.8% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 11.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 5.56% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 4.44% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.85% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 1.11% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.741% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.741% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎞شخصیت شناسی با فیلم 👇👇👇 Https://t.me/PersonaReel 💜مثل بلبل انگلیسی صحبت کن ❍@grobp1 💜ویسهای رایگان کارگاه های روانشناسی ❍@package_psy 💜من یک روان شناس کودک هستم ❍@psy_nadiehzareei 💜جذب جنس مخالف بااسرارروانشناسی ❍@psychology_gazor 💜رویای ناتمام ❍@vaj_hay_eshgh 💜انگلیسی آسان Easy English آموزش رایگان ❍@assimpleasabc 💜کافه موسیقی (تصویر - ترانه) ❍@musiccccafe 💜روانشناسی | راه سبز ❍@ravanshenasi_rahesab…
❤1
اما واقعیت اینه که شرم از پیچیده ترین احساسات انسانیه... و از بین بردنش، یا فرار کردن ازش، به اندازه تخریب یا فرار از غم و شادی غیرممکنه. شرم صرفا یک احساس معمولی نیست، بلکه یک بحران هستی شناسانهست که مستقیما به مرکز وجودی ما حمله میکنه، نه فقط به رفتارمون. زمان احساس گناه میگیم: «کار اشتباهی کردم»، اما در زمان تجربه شرم به این باور میرسیم که «من ذاتا ایراد دارم»؛ و این همون لحظه ایه که میل به «نبودن» در ما شکل…
❤5❤🔥4💯2💊1🔥1
۳. با خودت مثل یه دوست رفتار کن. اگه بهترین رفیقت یه اشتباه کوچیک میکرد، بهش میگفتی تو خیلی بیعرضهای؟ خب واقعا حقته که با خودت این کارو کنی؟ وقتی شرم اومد سراغت، سعی کن دقیقاً همون حرفایی رو به خودت بزنی که به یه دوست صمیمی میزدی. مهربون بودن با خودت، بزرگترین دشمن شرمه. #عرفان @Psy_RR
❤7💯2🔥1🤝1
۲. توی تاریکی نگهش ندار! شرم عاشق اینه که تو تنهایی خودت باهاش کلنجار بری، فرار کنی از بقیه، و قایمش کنی و رنج بکشی. وقتی خجالت میکشی، سعی نکن همه چیز رو بریزی تو خودت. دربارش با یه دوست یا آدم امن حرف بزن. وقتی شرم رو میاری بیرون و با صدای بلند به زبون میاری، اون غول بزرگی که تو ذهنت ساختی، یهو کوچیک میشه و میفهمی اونقدرها هم که فکر میکردی ترسناک نبوده. #عرفان @Psy_RR
❤7💯3🔥1
۱. صدایِ غریبه رو شناسایی کن. وقتی دچار شرمی و حس میکنی خیلی آدم بد یا ناکافی ای هستی، خیلی ضعیفی یا احمقی، بلافاصله مکث کن. این «صدای خودت» نیست. این صدایِ همون کساییه که قبلا قضاوتت کردن. موافقی؟ وقتی اون صدا ناشناس بود، به عنوان حقیقت مطلق قبولش میکردی. اما وقتی اسم میذاری روش (مثلا: صدای تحقیر معلم کلاس سومم، یا عیب جویی های پدربزرگم) یهو میفهمی که این فقط یه نظر شخصی بوده که یه آدم دیگه (که اون هم احتمالا کلی…
❤7💯2🔥2
خب برای امشب... ما فهمیدیم شرم چیه، و احساسش چه کاری باهامون میکنه... حالا وقتی که کسی بهمون حس شرم میده یا تلاش میکنه احساسش رو تجربه کنیم، وقتی خودمون با مقایسه یا مرور یک اتفاق دچار شرم میشیم، چجوری باهاش مقابله کنیم؟ ۳تا پیشنهاد برای پس زدن این انگل روانی!❌ #عرفان @Psy_RR
❤5🔥2❤🔥1💯1
راجع به اینکه چجور به بیرون پسش بزنیم، شبهای آینده حرف میزنم.🌱
❤11🔥2👌1💯1
به شکل خلاصه... اگه شرم داره به «بودن» تو حمله میکنه (که تو کی هستی)، پسش بزن. اما اگه داره به «عمل و رفتار» تو حمله میکنه (که چیکار کردی)، باهاش روبرو شو. ما قرار نیست برای پر کردن حفره ها و عقده های ذهنی بقیه، از اینکه اینجوری هستیم معذرت بخوایم و متاسف باشیم. ولی قرارم نیست با آسیب زدن به بقیه، از وجدان خودمون فرار کنیم. #عرفان @Psy_RR
❤10👏2💯2🔥2👍1
اما کجا نباید پسش زد؟ آیا شرم به شکل سالم هم وجود داره؟ وقتی تو از روی خودخواهی، بی رحمی، یا سنگدلی به دیگری آسیب میزنی، سوء استفاده میکنی، یه حس سنگین و ناخوشایند میاد سراغت! این کار تو نبود... تو با ارزشات یکی نیستی! این همون شرم سالمه... #عرفان @Psy_RR
❤8👍3💯2🔥1
شرمی که تجربه میکنیم، محصول نظرات آدمای دیگه، قضاوت های جامعه، یا اون استانداردهای غیرممکنیه که از بچگی توی گوشمون خوندن. این شرم به تو نمیگه چیکار کردی؛ یعنی راجع به اعمالت نیست. عوضش بهت میفهمونه که چی هستی!💔 یعنی به ماهیت و وجودت، به ذاتت حمله میکنه... به چیزی که خود تویی و خیلی وقتا قابل تغییر هم نیست! تو رو به عنوان یک موجود ناقص و بی ارزش جلوه میده.... وقتی از بیرون بهت میگن: چرا این شکلی هستی؟ چرا اینطوری ل…
❤8💯2🤝2👏1🔥1
اول ببینیم شرم چیه؟ این حس، یکی از سنگین ترین احساسات انسانیه... از اون دسته احساساتی که گاهی انقدر تجربش سخته، که بجاش خشم و غم رو تجربه میکنیم! اون حس که وقتی اشتباهی ازت سر میزنه، یا وقتی کسی نگاهت میکنه، یا موقعی که حس میکنی کافی نیستی، یهو توی وجودت خودشو نشون میده و تو رو از درون میخوره، پوچت میکنه، شرمندت میکنه، و باعث میشه از خودت متنفر بشی! اما سوال اصلی اینجاست: چطوری این شرم که از بیرون به ما تحمیل میشه …
❤11💯1🔥1
سلام چیکار کنیم از درون، شرمی که از بیرون میادو پس بزنیم؟ و اینکه چه موقع نباید پس بزنیم؟
❤9💯1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Psy_RR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسے، ریشه و روایت” (@Psy_RR), 523 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psy_RR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.