8 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Posted without readable text
Channel
|Proxy |Music | پروکسی
@ProxyDS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
593subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001722660764 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProxyDS |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProxyDS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 593 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 598 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 598 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.48%
- avg views ÷ 593 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8.8
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 44 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
7 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Posted without readable text
7 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Posted without readable text
30 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Setting up a proxy server may seem like a hassle, but it doesn’t have to be. Just follow these simple steps to get connected: 1. **Find Your Proxy Details**: You’ll need the server address and port number. Get these from a trusted source. 2. **Open Your Settings**: Go to your device’s network settings. Look for the section that handles proxy configurations. 3. **Input the Details**: Enter the server address and port…
21 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Let’s get real about proxy connections. Sometimes they fail, and that’s annoying. Here’s what to check if things go south: - Double-check the IP address and port you entered. A minor typo can cut off your access. - Is your proxy dying? Open your browser and see if it’s responding. If not, try another server. It happens. - Your internet could be causing issues too. Make sure your connection is stable before blaming t…
12 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Let’s talk about proxies and your online privacy. I remember when I first tried to use a proxy to access content that was otherwise blocked. The experience was frustrating. It was like a dance of trying various servers, some went down, others were as slow as molasses. You might think that every proxy is good for your privacy, but that's far from reality. Just because it hides your IP doesn’t mean it’s safe. You need …
3 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
If you're seeking new proxy options, you're not alone. Many users are on the hunt for reliable connections that won't slow them down. Here are a couple of fresh proxies you might want to check out: 1. Server: 176.65.131.45, Port: 25565 2. Server: 87.248.129.205, Port: 25565 3. Server: 178.105.239.80, Port: 7443 It's essential to test these out yourself. Feedback from other users can be mixed, and it's best to find …
25 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC26 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Having trouble with your proxy connection? Here are some straightforward tips to help you troubleshoot common issues: 1. **Check Your Details**: Ensure you’ve entered the correct IP address and port number. A simple typo can set you back. 2. **Test the Proxy**: Use a browser to see if the proxy is responding. If it’s not working, try a different one. Sometimes, proxies fail for reasons beyond your control. 3. **In…
25 Jun 2026, 05:41 UTC9 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
You ever try using a proxy, thinking it’s all smooth sailing for your online privacy? I did. I was just looking for a way to access some blocked content without a hitch. What I found was a rollercoaster ride of slow connections and constant disconnections. It was frustrating, and I realized that not all proxies are created equal. Some are just glorified speedbumps in your browsing. They can promise security, but if t…
24 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
People often think that using a proxy automatically guarantees security. This couldn't be further from the truth. Not all proxies encrypt your data, and many could be logging your activities instead. You might also believe that geographical restrictions will vanish just by switching to a proxy. But that’s not always the case; some services can recognize and block proxy traffic. And then there’s the speed issue. A lo…
24 Jun 2026, 05:42 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
You want to stream music without hiccups, right? Proxies can help with that. They mask your IP, letting you access content that might be locked in your region. But let’s not pretend it's all sunshine and rainbows. Using a proxy might slow down your connection or expose you to dodgy services that compromise your privacy. Not every proxy is good for streaming; some might just make things worse. Choose wisely based on …
23 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC13 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Think you know proxies? They aren’t just buzzwords tossed around in tech circles. I remember the first time I decided to give one a shot, frustrated by region-blocked content. I was skeptical, but honestly, it changed the game for me. Suddenly, I could access so much more without my ISP tracking my every move. But here’s the catch: not all proxies are reliable. I wasted a bunch of time on slow ones that were basical…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ProxyDS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 333,504 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“|Proxy |Music | پروکسی” (@ProxyDS), 593 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProxyDS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.