Channel
@ProtezioneCivile
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
62subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001088023152 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProtezioneCivile |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProtezioneCivile |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 62 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 63 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 63 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2022 to 10 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Infowar 🔞 Il segno della croce prima della morire… Nemmeno mi importa veramente da che parte arrivi quella bomba a mano e per chi combattesse questo ragazzo. Quello che conta è opporsi con ogni forza a chi finanzia, perpetua e vorrebbe ampliare questa guerra. #enemedia
Cosa pensi del sistema delle autonomie italiano basato sulle Regioni?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Invitiamo tutto il canale a sostenere il libro del Generale Vannacci con recensioni positive si sta scatenando una corsa a sostenerlo ed è primo in classifica tra i libri venduti in Italia. Non facciamo promozione per l'acquisto, ma chi è interessato lo acquisti per sostenere questa battaglia anche economicamente e fattualmente!
OGNUNO TRAGGA LE PROPRIE CONCLUSIONI. DA FEBBRAIO INVASO AL 100% DELLA CAPIENZA E POI C'ERA SICCITÀ???!!! https://www.ridracoli.it/
ASCOLTATE ATTENTAMENTE!!!
Voice message, posted without a caption
🔥1
CLIMATOLOGI IMBARAZZATI: AUMENTO DEL LIVELLO GLOBALE DI CO2 ACCOMPAGNA LA CRESCITA DEL GHIACCIO MARINO ARTICO Oggi osserviamo le calotte polari per il quale i catastrofisti del riscaldamento globale avevano previsto la fusione, quindi il collasso. Ad esempio, Al Gore aveva previsto la sparizione estiva dell’Artico entro il 2014. Mentre la CO2 ha avuto un incremento, il ghiaccio marino artico è AUMENTATO negli ultimi …
Circola, anche tra persone di cui ho stima, l’idea che la strategia da adottare in queste elezioni sia quella del non-voto. Una delle argomentazioni più elaborate che ho trovato a proposito sostiene che quando raggiungeremo una massa critica di astensionismo il “potere istituzionale” sarà costretto a venire a patti e ad accettare le richieste del popolo, richieste che riapriranno i giochi ed elimineranno l’attuale fo…
Ecco la grande siccità di cui ci hanno disfatto gli zebedei. Sta piovendo in tutta EUROPA ED ANCHE PARTE DELLA RUSSIA IN MODO COPIOSO...ABBONDANTE. PURE IL NORD ITALIA INIZIA AD ESSERE INTERESSATO DA FENOMENI TEMPORALESCHI. Non cadete nella favola della siccità!!!
Esattamente 2 anni fa, i giornali che ora declamano il caldo, la siccità ed il cambiamento climatico. non sapevano come fare a giustificare un'estate dal clima mite se non quasi fresco, e con i ghiacci dell'Antartico che erano aumentati di un milione di kilometri cubi.
Photo, posted without a caption
⚠️ DRAGHI HA DECISO: SI DIMETTE ⚠️ È ufficiale, Draghi si dimette. Fonti interne ci comunicano che Draghi salirà questa sera stessa a presentare le dimissioni. 🔵 UNISCITI: https://t.me/truthsocialitalia
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ProtezioneCivile. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Cosa pensi del sistema delle autonomie italiano basato sulle Regioni?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2022 to 10 September 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ProtezioneCivile named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PROTEZIONE CIVILE EMERGENZA ITALIANA” (@ProtezioneCivile), 62 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProtezioneCivile.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.