https://taplink.cc/dilshod.burkhonov

Channel
βπ£π π‘ππ£ πΈππ€ πΊπΈ
@ProperAds
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Cite this entry
179subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001410793006 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProperAds |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProperAds |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 09:20 | 179 | -2 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 05:14 | 181 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 180 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 181 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 182 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 182 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 January 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 10 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2023 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/HalalBazaarUS
https://t.me/HalalBazaarUS
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Do you know any independent candidates?
- Yes72%
- No28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
π1
Donald or Kamala?
- Harris57%
- Trump43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following concerns are most important to you?
- Economic Issues75%
- Healthcare38%
- Crime and Public Safety13%
- Political Polarization13%
- Climate Change50%
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
https://youtu.be/_p0gO0TFw6k
Photo, posted without a caption
If you want such a professional financial analysis, go ahead and use www.batob.ru
Do you think that the division and hatred of Sunnis and Shiites towards each other is harmful to both sides and generally it has a negative impact on the interests of Muslims in international politics, thus serving the interests of Islamophobes?
- Yes, I think so87%
- No, I don't think so0%
- I have no idea13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
π3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ProperAds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you know any independent candidates?
- Yes72%
- No28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Donald or Kamala?
- Harris57%
- Trump43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following concerns are most important to you?
- Economic Issues75%
- Healthcare38%
- Crime and Public Safety13%
- Political Polarization13%
- Climate Change50%
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Do you think that the division and hatred of Sunnis and Shiites towards each other is harmful to both sides and generally it has a negative impact on the interests of Muslims in international politics, thus serving the interests of Islamophobes?
- Yes, I think so87%
- No, I don't think so0%
- I have no idea13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who do you think is going to win in the upcoming fight between Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk?
- Mark59%
- Elon41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
With the entry into the era of automation and robotization, do you think artificial intelligence is a threat to humanity in the future?
- Yes77%
- No23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2023 to 4 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββπ£π π‘ππ£ πΈππ€ πΊπΈβ (@ProperAds), 179 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProperAds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.